Clinical assessment of two inlay-retained bridge designs in missing posterior teeth cases: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Soliman, Gomaa
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Mahallawi, Omaima, Hamdy, Iman
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Dental Science
Texto Completo: https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/2725
Resumo: Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of two inlay-retained bridge designs (proximalshaped and inlay shaped) in single missing posterior teeth cases. Material and Methods: A total of 70 caseswith missing single posterior teeth were included in this study and divided into two groups with a 1:1 allocationratio (n = 35 for each group). Group 1 (the control group): this group received an inlay retained bridge withinlay design on both abutments. Group 2 (the intervention group): this group received an inlay retained bridgewith a proximal box on both abutments. PMMA resin (YAMAHACHI PMMA) was used for the try-in stage andmonolithic zirconia (Katana, Kuraray) was used for the final restorations. The restoration surfaces were treatedusing sandblasting and Z-prime S (Bisco) and the cementation was done by using self-adhesive resin cement(Bisco). Fracture, marginal adaptation, postoperative sensitivity, caries, and gingivitis were assessed using themodified United States Public Health Service for restoration clinical assessments (MUSPHS standards) over 12months of follow-up. Results: The results show there was no significant difference between the two groups.Kaplan-Meier survival curve was constructed to calculate the mean survival estimates of the two groups and wefound that the two groups were clinically successful during a one-year follow-up. Conclusion: Both designs ofinlay retained fixed dental prostheses revealed successful clinical performance in terms of Fracture, marginaladaptation, postoperative sensitivity, caries, and gingivitis.KEYWORDSFracture; Inlay-retained fixed dental prosthesis; PMMA; Resin cement; Zirconia.
id UNESP-20_82b9be1e2e33c670ba46d11db08cacf2
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2725
network_acronym_str UNESP-20
network_name_str Brazilian Dental Science
repository_id_str
spelling Clinical assessment of two inlay-retained bridge designs in missing posterior teeth cases: a Randomized Clinical TrialObjective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of two inlay-retained bridge designs (proximalshaped and inlay shaped) in single missing posterior teeth cases. Material and Methods: A total of 70 caseswith missing single posterior teeth were included in this study and divided into two groups with a 1:1 allocationratio (n = 35 for each group). Group 1 (the control group): this group received an inlay retained bridge withinlay design on both abutments. Group 2 (the intervention group): this group received an inlay retained bridgewith a proximal box on both abutments. PMMA resin (YAMAHACHI PMMA) was used for the try-in stage andmonolithic zirconia (Katana, Kuraray) was used for the final restorations. The restoration surfaces were treatedusing sandblasting and Z-prime S (Bisco) and the cementation was done by using self-adhesive resin cement(Bisco). Fracture, marginal adaptation, postoperative sensitivity, caries, and gingivitis were assessed using themodified United States Public Health Service for restoration clinical assessments (MUSPHS standards) over 12months of follow-up. Results: The results show there was no significant difference between the two groups.Kaplan-Meier survival curve was constructed to calculate the mean survival estimates of the two groups and wefound that the two groups were clinically successful during a one-year follow-up. Conclusion: Both designs ofinlay retained fixed dental prostheses revealed successful clinical performance in terms of Fracture, marginaladaptation, postoperative sensitivity, caries, and gingivitis.KEYWORDSFracture; Inlay-retained fixed dental prosthesis; PMMA; Resin cement; Zirconia.Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos2022-04-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/272510.4322/bds.2022.e2725Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 25 No. 2 (2022): Apr - Jun / 2022 - Published Mar 2022Brazilian Dental Science; v. 25 n. 2 (2022): Apr - Jun / 2022 - Published Mar 20222178-6011reponame:Brazilian Dental Scienceinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)instacron:UNESPenghttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/2725/4501Copyright (c) 2022 Brazilian Dental Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSoliman, GomaaMahallawi, OmaimaHamdy, Iman2022-03-31T17:53:34Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2725Revistahttp://bds.ict.unesp.br/PUBhttp://ojs.fosjc.unesp.br/index.php/index/oaisergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br2178-60112178-6011opendoar:2022-11-08T16:30:39.201661Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Clinical assessment of two inlay-retained bridge designs in missing posterior teeth cases: a Randomized Clinical Trial
title Clinical assessment of two inlay-retained bridge designs in missing posterior teeth cases: a Randomized Clinical Trial
spellingShingle Clinical assessment of two inlay-retained bridge designs in missing posterior teeth cases: a Randomized Clinical Trial
Soliman, Gomaa
title_short Clinical assessment of two inlay-retained bridge designs in missing posterior teeth cases: a Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full Clinical assessment of two inlay-retained bridge designs in missing posterior teeth cases: a Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Clinical assessment of two inlay-retained bridge designs in missing posterior teeth cases: a Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Clinical assessment of two inlay-retained bridge designs in missing posterior teeth cases: a Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort Clinical assessment of two inlay-retained bridge designs in missing posterior teeth cases: a Randomized Clinical Trial
author Soliman, Gomaa
author_facet Soliman, Gomaa
Mahallawi, Omaima
Hamdy, Iman
author_role author
author2 Mahallawi, Omaima
Hamdy, Iman
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Soliman, Gomaa
Mahallawi, Omaima
Hamdy, Iman
description Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of two inlay-retained bridge designs (proximalshaped and inlay shaped) in single missing posterior teeth cases. Material and Methods: A total of 70 caseswith missing single posterior teeth were included in this study and divided into two groups with a 1:1 allocationratio (n = 35 for each group). Group 1 (the control group): this group received an inlay retained bridge withinlay design on both abutments. Group 2 (the intervention group): this group received an inlay retained bridgewith a proximal box on both abutments. PMMA resin (YAMAHACHI PMMA) was used for the try-in stage andmonolithic zirconia (Katana, Kuraray) was used for the final restorations. The restoration surfaces were treatedusing sandblasting and Z-prime S (Bisco) and the cementation was done by using self-adhesive resin cement(Bisco). Fracture, marginal adaptation, postoperative sensitivity, caries, and gingivitis were assessed using themodified United States Public Health Service for restoration clinical assessments (MUSPHS standards) over 12months of follow-up. Results: The results show there was no significant difference between the two groups.Kaplan-Meier survival curve was constructed to calculate the mean survival estimates of the two groups and wefound that the two groups were clinically successful during a one-year follow-up. Conclusion: Both designs ofinlay retained fixed dental prostheses revealed successful clinical performance in terms of Fracture, marginaladaptation, postoperative sensitivity, caries, and gingivitis.KEYWORDSFracture; Inlay-retained fixed dental prosthesis; PMMA; Resin cement; Zirconia.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-04-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/2725
10.4322/bds.2022.e2725
url https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/2725
identifier_str_mv 10.4322/bds.2022.e2725
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/2725/4501
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Brazilian Dental Science
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Brazilian Dental Science
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 25 No. 2 (2022): Apr - Jun / 2022 - Published Mar 2022
Brazilian Dental Science; v. 25 n. 2 (2022): Apr - Jun / 2022 - Published Mar 2022
2178-6011
reponame:Brazilian Dental Science
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Brazilian Dental Science
collection Brazilian Dental Science
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv sergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br
_version_ 1788346902252617728