Clinical assessment of two inlay-retained bridge designs in missing posterior teeth cases: a Randomized Clinical Trial
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Dental Science |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/2725 |
Resumo: | Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of two inlay-retained bridge designs (proximalshaped and inlay shaped) in single missing posterior teeth cases. Material and Methods: A total of 70 caseswith missing single posterior teeth were included in this study and divided into two groups with a 1:1 allocationratio (n = 35 for each group). Group 1 (the control group): this group received an inlay retained bridge withinlay design on both abutments. Group 2 (the intervention group): this group received an inlay retained bridgewith a proximal box on both abutments. PMMA resin (YAMAHACHI PMMA) was used for the try-in stage andmonolithic zirconia (Katana, Kuraray) was used for the final restorations. The restoration surfaces were treatedusing sandblasting and Z-prime S (Bisco) and the cementation was done by using self-adhesive resin cement(Bisco). Fracture, marginal adaptation, postoperative sensitivity, caries, and gingivitis were assessed using themodified United States Public Health Service for restoration clinical assessments (MUSPHS standards) over 12months of follow-up. Results: The results show there was no significant difference between the two groups.Kaplan-Meier survival curve was constructed to calculate the mean survival estimates of the two groups and wefound that the two groups were clinically successful during a one-year follow-up. Conclusion: Both designs ofinlay retained fixed dental prostheses revealed successful clinical performance in terms of Fracture, marginaladaptation, postoperative sensitivity, caries, and gingivitis.KEYWORDSFracture; Inlay-retained fixed dental prosthesis; PMMA; Resin cement; Zirconia. |
id |
UNESP-20_82b9be1e2e33c670ba46d11db08cacf2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2725 |
network_acronym_str |
UNESP-20 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Dental Science |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Clinical assessment of two inlay-retained bridge designs in missing posterior teeth cases: a Randomized Clinical TrialObjective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of two inlay-retained bridge designs (proximalshaped and inlay shaped) in single missing posterior teeth cases. Material and Methods: A total of 70 caseswith missing single posterior teeth were included in this study and divided into two groups with a 1:1 allocationratio (n = 35 for each group). Group 1 (the control group): this group received an inlay retained bridge withinlay design on both abutments. Group 2 (the intervention group): this group received an inlay retained bridgewith a proximal box on both abutments. PMMA resin (YAMAHACHI PMMA) was used for the try-in stage andmonolithic zirconia (Katana, Kuraray) was used for the final restorations. The restoration surfaces were treatedusing sandblasting and Z-prime S (Bisco) and the cementation was done by using self-adhesive resin cement(Bisco). Fracture, marginal adaptation, postoperative sensitivity, caries, and gingivitis were assessed using themodified United States Public Health Service for restoration clinical assessments (MUSPHS standards) over 12months of follow-up. Results: The results show there was no significant difference between the two groups.Kaplan-Meier survival curve was constructed to calculate the mean survival estimates of the two groups and wefound that the two groups were clinically successful during a one-year follow-up. Conclusion: Both designs ofinlay retained fixed dental prostheses revealed successful clinical performance in terms of Fracture, marginaladaptation, postoperative sensitivity, caries, and gingivitis.KEYWORDSFracture; Inlay-retained fixed dental prosthesis; PMMA; Resin cement; Zirconia.Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos2022-04-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/272510.4322/bds.2022.e2725Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 25 No. 2 (2022): Apr - Jun / 2022 - Published Mar 2022Brazilian Dental Science; v. 25 n. 2 (2022): Apr - Jun / 2022 - Published Mar 20222178-6011reponame:Brazilian Dental Scienceinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)instacron:UNESPenghttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/2725/4501Copyright (c) 2022 Brazilian Dental Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSoliman, GomaaMahallawi, OmaimaHamdy, Iman2022-03-31T17:53:34Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2725Revistahttp://bds.ict.unesp.br/PUBhttp://ojs.fosjc.unesp.br/index.php/index/oaisergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br2178-60112178-6011opendoar:2022-11-08T16:30:39.201661Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinical assessment of two inlay-retained bridge designs in missing posterior teeth cases: a Randomized Clinical Trial |
title |
Clinical assessment of two inlay-retained bridge designs in missing posterior teeth cases: a Randomized Clinical Trial |
spellingShingle |
Clinical assessment of two inlay-retained bridge designs in missing posterior teeth cases: a Randomized Clinical Trial Soliman, Gomaa |
title_short |
Clinical assessment of two inlay-retained bridge designs in missing posterior teeth cases: a Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full |
Clinical assessment of two inlay-retained bridge designs in missing posterior teeth cases: a Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_fullStr |
Clinical assessment of two inlay-retained bridge designs in missing posterior teeth cases: a Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Clinical assessment of two inlay-retained bridge designs in missing posterior teeth cases: a Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_sort |
Clinical assessment of two inlay-retained bridge designs in missing posterior teeth cases: a Randomized Clinical Trial |
author |
Soliman, Gomaa |
author_facet |
Soliman, Gomaa Mahallawi, Omaima Hamdy, Iman |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mahallawi, Omaima Hamdy, Iman |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Soliman, Gomaa Mahallawi, Omaima Hamdy, Iman |
description |
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of two inlay-retained bridge designs (proximalshaped and inlay shaped) in single missing posterior teeth cases. Material and Methods: A total of 70 caseswith missing single posterior teeth were included in this study and divided into two groups with a 1:1 allocationratio (n = 35 for each group). Group 1 (the control group): this group received an inlay retained bridge withinlay design on both abutments. Group 2 (the intervention group): this group received an inlay retained bridgewith a proximal box on both abutments. PMMA resin (YAMAHACHI PMMA) was used for the try-in stage andmonolithic zirconia (Katana, Kuraray) was used for the final restorations. The restoration surfaces were treatedusing sandblasting and Z-prime S (Bisco) and the cementation was done by using self-adhesive resin cement(Bisco). Fracture, marginal adaptation, postoperative sensitivity, caries, and gingivitis were assessed using themodified United States Public Health Service for restoration clinical assessments (MUSPHS standards) over 12months of follow-up. Results: The results show there was no significant difference between the two groups.Kaplan-Meier survival curve was constructed to calculate the mean survival estimates of the two groups and wefound that the two groups were clinically successful during a one-year follow-up. Conclusion: Both designs ofinlay retained fixed dental prostheses revealed successful clinical performance in terms of Fracture, marginaladaptation, postoperative sensitivity, caries, and gingivitis.KEYWORDSFracture; Inlay-retained fixed dental prosthesis; PMMA; Resin cement; Zirconia. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-04-13 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/2725 10.4322/bds.2022.e2725 |
url |
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/2725 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4322/bds.2022.e2725 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/2725/4501 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Brazilian Dental Science info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Brazilian Dental Science |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 25 No. 2 (2022): Apr - Jun / 2022 - Published Mar 2022 Brazilian Dental Science; v. 25 n. 2 (2022): Apr - Jun / 2022 - Published Mar 2022 2178-6011 reponame:Brazilian Dental Science instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Dental Science |
collection |
Brazilian Dental Science |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
sergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br |
_version_ |
1788346902252617728 |