Comparative evaluation of blood pressure measuring equipment
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Dental Science |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1007 |
Resumo: | Objective: This study evaluated the agreement of blood pressure measurements obtained through different auscultatory and oscillometric automated/semi-automated monitors. Material and Methods: The blood pressure of 30 participants was evaluated by a single calibrated examiner. The measurements were carried out through either auscultatory monitor (mercury column or aneroid) or automated/semiautomated oscillometric pulse monitors. For each participant, 5 min rest was established by sitting on dental chair and the measurements were always carried out on the left arm, at the heart level. Three consecutive measurements were performed with the four monitors in each participant with a minimum time interval of five minutes between each measurement. All monitors were properly calibrated and certified by INMETRO. The results were submitted to intraclass correlation coefficient and Friedman’s analysis of variance. Results: The measurements of systolic blood pressure for both auscultatory and oscillometric methods were similar. The measurements of diastolic blood pressure for auscultatory monitors were similar (p > 0.05); as well as for oscillometric monitors (p > 0.05). However, when auscultatory and oscillometric monitors were compared, there were statistically significant differences in diastolic blood pressure (p < 0.05). Conclusion: It was verified a difference in the results between the auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure monitors. The systolic blood pressure measurements exhibited similar correlations, whilediastolic blood pressure measurements showed different correlations. |
id |
UNESP-20_aa000f92acae3abce8f77e1d6e2c0654 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1007 |
network_acronym_str |
UNESP-20 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Dental Science |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparative evaluation of blood pressure measuring equipmentObjective: This study evaluated the agreement of blood pressure measurements obtained through different auscultatory and oscillometric automated/semi-automated monitors. Material and Methods: The blood pressure of 30 participants was evaluated by a single calibrated examiner. The measurements were carried out through either auscultatory monitor (mercury column or aneroid) or automated/semiautomated oscillometric pulse monitors. For each participant, 5 min rest was established by sitting on dental chair and the measurements were always carried out on the left arm, at the heart level. Three consecutive measurements were performed with the four monitors in each participant with a minimum time interval of five minutes between each measurement. All monitors were properly calibrated and certified by INMETRO. The results were submitted to intraclass correlation coefficient and Friedman’s analysis of variance. Results: The measurements of systolic blood pressure for both auscultatory and oscillometric methods were similar. The measurements of diastolic blood pressure for auscultatory monitors were similar (p > 0.05); as well as for oscillometric monitors (p > 0.05). However, when auscultatory and oscillometric monitors were compared, there were statistically significant differences in diastolic blood pressure (p < 0.05). Conclusion: It was verified a difference in the results between the auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure monitors. The systolic blood pressure measurements exhibited similar correlations, whilediastolic blood pressure measurements showed different correlations. Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos2014-11-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/mswordhttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/100710.14295/bds.2014.v17i4.1007Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 17 No. 4 (2014): Oct. - Dec. / 2014 - Published November 2014; 48-52Brazilian Dental Science; v. 17 n. 4 (2014): Oct. - Dec. / 2014 - Published November 2014; 48-522178-6011reponame:Brazilian Dental Scienceinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)instacron:UNESPenghttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1007/910https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1007/2117Oka, Erika KaoriFleury Curado, Liza TaveiraSantos, Lucio Murilo dosSantamaria, MauroMoraes, Michelle BianchiNascimento, Rodrigo DiasHaldi, Fernando Vagnerinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-01-28T12:30:28Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1007Revistahttp://bds.ict.unesp.br/PUBhttp://ojs.fosjc.unesp.br/index.php/index/oaisergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br2178-60112178-6011opendoar:2022-11-08T16:29:57.727770Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparative evaluation of blood pressure measuring equipment |
title |
Comparative evaluation of blood pressure measuring equipment |
spellingShingle |
Comparative evaluation of blood pressure measuring equipment Oka, Erika Kaori |
title_short |
Comparative evaluation of blood pressure measuring equipment |
title_full |
Comparative evaluation of blood pressure measuring equipment |
title_fullStr |
Comparative evaluation of blood pressure measuring equipment |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative evaluation of blood pressure measuring equipment |
title_sort |
Comparative evaluation of blood pressure measuring equipment |
author |
Oka, Erika Kaori |
author_facet |
Oka, Erika Kaori Fleury Curado, Liza Taveira Santos, Lucio Murilo dos Santamaria, Mauro Moraes, Michelle Bianchi Nascimento, Rodrigo Dias Haldi, Fernando Vagner |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Fleury Curado, Liza Taveira Santos, Lucio Murilo dos Santamaria, Mauro Moraes, Michelle Bianchi Nascimento, Rodrigo Dias Haldi, Fernando Vagner |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oka, Erika Kaori Fleury Curado, Liza Taveira Santos, Lucio Murilo dos Santamaria, Mauro Moraes, Michelle Bianchi Nascimento, Rodrigo Dias Haldi, Fernando Vagner |
description |
Objective: This study evaluated the agreement of blood pressure measurements obtained through different auscultatory and oscillometric automated/semi-automated monitors. Material and Methods: The blood pressure of 30 participants was evaluated by a single calibrated examiner. The measurements were carried out through either auscultatory monitor (mercury column or aneroid) or automated/semiautomated oscillometric pulse monitors. For each participant, 5 min rest was established by sitting on dental chair and the measurements were always carried out on the left arm, at the heart level. Three consecutive measurements were performed with the four monitors in each participant with a minimum time interval of five minutes between each measurement. All monitors were properly calibrated and certified by INMETRO. The results were submitted to intraclass correlation coefficient and Friedman’s analysis of variance. Results: The measurements of systolic blood pressure for both auscultatory and oscillometric methods were similar. The measurements of diastolic blood pressure for auscultatory monitors were similar (p > 0.05); as well as for oscillometric monitors (p > 0.05). However, when auscultatory and oscillometric monitors were compared, there were statistically significant differences in diastolic blood pressure (p < 0.05). Conclusion: It was verified a difference in the results between the auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure monitors. The systolic blood pressure measurements exhibited similar correlations, whilediastolic blood pressure measurements showed different correlations. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-11-03 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1007 10.14295/bds.2014.v17i4.1007 |
url |
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1007 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14295/bds.2014.v17i4.1007 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1007/910 https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1007/2117 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/msword |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 17 No. 4 (2014): Oct. - Dec. / 2014 - Published November 2014; 48-52 Brazilian Dental Science; v. 17 n. 4 (2014): Oct. - Dec. / 2014 - Published November 2014; 48-52 2178-6011 reponame:Brazilian Dental Science instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Dental Science |
collection |
Brazilian Dental Science |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
sergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br |
_version_ |
1788346898983157760 |