A comparative study of biaxial flexural strength and Vickers microhardness of different zirconia materials: Effect of glazing and thermal cycling

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Salihoglu Yener, Esra
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Ozcan, Mutlu, Kazazoglu, Ender
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Dental Science
Texto Completo: https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1109
Resumo: Objective:This study evaluated the effect of glazing and thermal cycling on biaxial flexural strength and Vickers hardness of different zirconia core materials. Material and Methods: Disc shaped zirconia specimens (15 mm x 1.15 mm) were fabricated out of three systems (ZirkonZahn, Cercon, Ceramill) according to each manufacturer`s instructions. The specimens of each system were randomly divided into initially 2 groups. While half of the specimens were glazed, the other half was left unglazed. Each group was further divided into 4 subgroups to be subjected to thermal cycling (0-control, 1000, 3000, 5000 cycles, 5-55 ºC). Biaxial flexural strength was tested in a universal testing machine (1 mm/min). Another set of unglazed zirconia specimens were made and tested for Vickers microhardness with and without thermocycling (0-control, 1000, 3000, 5000 cycles, 5-55 ºC). Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA, two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). Results: In non-aged conditions (11034-1388 MPa), glazing significantly decreased the biaxial flexural strength of all zirconia ceramics (845.65-897.35 MPa) (p = 0.000). While in the non-glazed groups, all thermal cycling regimens significantly decreased the biaxial flexural strength (864-1156 MPa) (p=0.000), in glazed groups thermal cycling did not affect the results (829.4-854.9 MPa) (p = 0.405). Compared to the non-aged group (1414.1 VHN), thermal cycling decreased the Vickers hardness significantly only for Cercon (1365.9 VHN) (p = 0.005). Conclusion: Glazing decreased the biaxial flexural strength of the zirconia ceramics tested. Unglazed zirconia ceramics were weaker against thermal cycling compared to glazed ones. For monolithic zirconia restorations, this information may have clinical importance.Keywords:Biaxial flexural strength; Glazing; Thermal cycling; Vickers microhardness; Zirconia.
id UNESP-20_cf236ca16e11363eff33c088c9875711
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1109
network_acronym_str UNESP-20
network_name_str Brazilian Dental Science
repository_id_str
spelling A comparative study of biaxial flexural strength and Vickers microhardness of different zirconia materials: Effect of glazing and thermal cyclingObjective:This study evaluated the effect of glazing and thermal cycling on biaxial flexural strength and Vickers hardness of different zirconia core materials. Material and Methods: Disc shaped zirconia specimens (15 mm x 1.15 mm) were fabricated out of three systems (ZirkonZahn, Cercon, Ceramill) according to each manufacturer`s instructions. The specimens of each system were randomly divided into initially 2 groups. While half of the specimens were glazed, the other half was left unglazed. Each group was further divided into 4 subgroups to be subjected to thermal cycling (0-control, 1000, 3000, 5000 cycles, 5-55 ºC). Biaxial flexural strength was tested in a universal testing machine (1 mm/min). Another set of unglazed zirconia specimens were made and tested for Vickers microhardness with and without thermocycling (0-control, 1000, 3000, 5000 cycles, 5-55 ºC). Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA, two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). Results: In non-aged conditions (11034-1388 MPa), glazing significantly decreased the biaxial flexural strength of all zirconia ceramics (845.65-897.35 MPa) (p = 0.000). While in the non-glazed groups, all thermal cycling regimens significantly decreased the biaxial flexural strength (864-1156 MPa) (p=0.000), in glazed groups thermal cycling did not affect the results (829.4-854.9 MPa) (p = 0.405). Compared to the non-aged group (1414.1 VHN), thermal cycling decreased the Vickers hardness significantly only for Cercon (1365.9 VHN) (p = 0.005). Conclusion: Glazing decreased the biaxial flexural strength of the zirconia ceramics tested. Unglazed zirconia ceramics were weaker against thermal cycling compared to glazed ones. For monolithic zirconia restorations, this information may have clinical importance.Keywords:Biaxial flexural strength; Glazing; Thermal cycling; Vickers microhardness; Zirconia.Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos2015-06-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/mswordapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/mswordapplication/mswordapplication/mswordapplication/mswordhttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/110910.14295/bds.2015.v18i2.1109Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 18 No. 2 (2015): Apr. - Jun. / 2015 - Published May 2015; 19-30Brazilian Dental Science; v. 18 n. 2 (2015): Apr. - Jun. / 2015 - Published May 2015; 19-302178-6011reponame:Brazilian Dental Scienceinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)instacron:UNESPenghttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1109/945https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1109/2323https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1109/2324https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1109/2325https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1109/2326https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1109/2327https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1109/2336https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1109/2337Salihoglu Yener, EsraOzcan, MutluKazazoglu, Enderinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-01-28T12:27:41Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1109Revistahttp://bds.ict.unesp.br/PUBhttp://ojs.fosjc.unesp.br/index.php/index/oaisergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br2178-60112178-6011opendoar:2022-11-08T16:30:01.057112Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A comparative study of biaxial flexural strength and Vickers microhardness of different zirconia materials: Effect of glazing and thermal cycling
title A comparative study of biaxial flexural strength and Vickers microhardness of different zirconia materials: Effect of glazing and thermal cycling
spellingShingle A comparative study of biaxial flexural strength and Vickers microhardness of different zirconia materials: Effect of glazing and thermal cycling
Salihoglu Yener, Esra
title_short A comparative study of biaxial flexural strength and Vickers microhardness of different zirconia materials: Effect of glazing and thermal cycling
title_full A comparative study of biaxial flexural strength and Vickers microhardness of different zirconia materials: Effect of glazing and thermal cycling
title_fullStr A comparative study of biaxial flexural strength and Vickers microhardness of different zirconia materials: Effect of glazing and thermal cycling
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of biaxial flexural strength and Vickers microhardness of different zirconia materials: Effect of glazing and thermal cycling
title_sort A comparative study of biaxial flexural strength and Vickers microhardness of different zirconia materials: Effect of glazing and thermal cycling
author Salihoglu Yener, Esra
author_facet Salihoglu Yener, Esra
Ozcan, Mutlu
Kazazoglu, Ender
author_role author
author2 Ozcan, Mutlu
Kazazoglu, Ender
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Salihoglu Yener, Esra
Ozcan, Mutlu
Kazazoglu, Ender
description Objective:This study evaluated the effect of glazing and thermal cycling on biaxial flexural strength and Vickers hardness of different zirconia core materials. Material and Methods: Disc shaped zirconia specimens (15 mm x 1.15 mm) were fabricated out of three systems (ZirkonZahn, Cercon, Ceramill) according to each manufacturer`s instructions. The specimens of each system were randomly divided into initially 2 groups. While half of the specimens were glazed, the other half was left unglazed. Each group was further divided into 4 subgroups to be subjected to thermal cycling (0-control, 1000, 3000, 5000 cycles, 5-55 ºC). Biaxial flexural strength was tested in a universal testing machine (1 mm/min). Another set of unglazed zirconia specimens were made and tested for Vickers microhardness with and without thermocycling (0-control, 1000, 3000, 5000 cycles, 5-55 ºC). Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA, two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). Results: In non-aged conditions (11034-1388 MPa), glazing significantly decreased the biaxial flexural strength of all zirconia ceramics (845.65-897.35 MPa) (p = 0.000). While in the non-glazed groups, all thermal cycling regimens significantly decreased the biaxial flexural strength (864-1156 MPa) (p=0.000), in glazed groups thermal cycling did not affect the results (829.4-854.9 MPa) (p = 0.405). Compared to the non-aged group (1414.1 VHN), thermal cycling decreased the Vickers hardness significantly only for Cercon (1365.9 VHN) (p = 0.005). Conclusion: Glazing decreased the biaxial flexural strength of the zirconia ceramics tested. Unglazed zirconia ceramics were weaker against thermal cycling compared to glazed ones. For monolithic zirconia restorations, this information may have clinical importance.Keywords:Biaxial flexural strength; Glazing; Thermal cycling; Vickers microhardness; Zirconia.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-06-12
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1109
10.14295/bds.2015.v18i2.1109
url https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1109
identifier_str_mv 10.14295/bds.2015.v18i2.1109
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1109/945
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1109/2323
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1109/2324
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1109/2325
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1109/2326
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1109/2327
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1109/2336
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/1109/2337
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/msword
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/msword
application/msword
application/msword
application/msword
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 18 No. 2 (2015): Apr. - Jun. / 2015 - Published May 2015; 19-30
Brazilian Dental Science; v. 18 n. 2 (2015): Apr. - Jun. / 2015 - Published May 2015; 19-30
2178-6011
reponame:Brazilian Dental Science
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Brazilian Dental Science
collection Brazilian Dental Science
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv sergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br
_version_ 1788346899319750656