Photosensitizers and Exposure Times To Light Showed Tissue Compatibility In Isogenic Mice

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Assed Bezerra da Silva, Raquel
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Silva Barroso de Oliveira, Daniela, Morant Holanda de Oliveira, Katharina, Pucinelli, Carolina Maschietto, Nelson Filho, Paulo, Consolaro, Alberto, Belém Novaes Jr, Arthur, Assed Bezerra da Silva, Lea
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Dental Science
Texto Completo: https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/2340
Resumo: Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the subcutaneous tissue response after different protocols to photodynamic therapy (PDT). In Phase 1, were tested the diode laser (used for 1min) associated to the photosensitizer phenothiazine chloride solution (PCS) in different concentrations. In Phase 2 – the diode laser and LED were tested associated to two different photosensitizers, PCS and Curcumin, in different exposure times of light application. Material and Methods: After 7, 21 and 63-days the animals were euthanized and the subcutaneous tissue processed to histological analysis. Qualitative and semi-quantitative descriptions of the inflammatory process and immunohistochemical technique were performed. The obtained data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post-test (alpha = 0.5). Results: On Phase 1, the tissue response was very similar among the groups. For the inflammatory infiltrate, PCS with concentration of 10mg/mL exhibited the most intense reaction (p > 0.05). On Phase 2, at 7-days period, the analyzed parameters presented small magnitude and after 21 and 63-days, all the parameters demonstrated tissue compatibility. Conclusion: Both photosensitizers presented proper tissue compatibility regardless the different concentrations used on Phase 1 and different durations of light exposure on Phase 2.   Keywords Photodynamic therapy; Phenothiazine chloride solution; Curcumin; Isogenic mice; Subcutaneous tissue.
id UNESP-20_e3ef4a4a46534773d10d78a451a33c0f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2340
network_acronym_str UNESP-20
network_name_str Brazilian Dental Science
repository_id_str
spelling Photosensitizers and Exposure Times To Light Showed Tissue Compatibility In Isogenic MiceObjective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the subcutaneous tissue response after different protocols to photodynamic therapy (PDT). In Phase 1, were tested the diode laser (used for 1min) associated to the photosensitizer phenothiazine chloride solution (PCS) in different concentrations. In Phase 2 – the diode laser and LED were tested associated to two different photosensitizers, PCS and Curcumin, in different exposure times of light application. Material and Methods: After 7, 21 and 63-days the animals were euthanized and the subcutaneous tissue processed to histological analysis. Qualitative and semi-quantitative descriptions of the inflammatory process and immunohistochemical technique were performed. The obtained data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post-test (alpha = 0.5). Results: On Phase 1, the tissue response was very similar among the groups. For the inflammatory infiltrate, PCS with concentration of 10mg/mL exhibited the most intense reaction (p > 0.05). On Phase 2, at 7-days period, the analyzed parameters presented small magnitude and after 21 and 63-days, all the parameters demonstrated tissue compatibility. Conclusion: Both photosensitizers presented proper tissue compatibility regardless the different concentrations used on Phase 1 and different durations of light exposure on Phase 2.   Keywords Photodynamic therapy; Phenothiazine chloride solution; Curcumin; Isogenic mice; Subcutaneous tissue.Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos2021-03-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/234010.14295/bds.2021.v24i2.2340Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 24 No. 2 (2021): Apr - Jun / 2021 - published Mar 2021Brazilian Dental Science; v. 24 n. 2 (2021): Apr - Jun / 2021 - published Mar 20212178-6011reponame:Brazilian Dental Scienceinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPenghttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/2340/4294Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Dental Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAssed Bezerra da Silva, Raquel Silva Barroso de Oliveira, Daniela Morant Holanda de Oliveira, Katharina Pucinelli, Carolina MaschiettoNelson Filho, PauloConsolaro, Alberto Belém Novaes Jr, Arthur Assed Bezerra da Silva, Lea 2021-03-31T19:23:15Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2340Revistahttp://bds.ict.unesp.br/PUBhttp://ojs.fosjc.unesp.br/index.php/index/oaisergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br||bds.ict@unesp.br2178-60112178-6011opendoar:2021-03-31T19:23:15Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Photosensitizers and Exposure Times To Light Showed Tissue Compatibility In Isogenic Mice
title Photosensitizers and Exposure Times To Light Showed Tissue Compatibility In Isogenic Mice
spellingShingle Photosensitizers and Exposure Times To Light Showed Tissue Compatibility In Isogenic Mice
Assed Bezerra da Silva, Raquel
title_short Photosensitizers and Exposure Times To Light Showed Tissue Compatibility In Isogenic Mice
title_full Photosensitizers and Exposure Times To Light Showed Tissue Compatibility In Isogenic Mice
title_fullStr Photosensitizers and Exposure Times To Light Showed Tissue Compatibility In Isogenic Mice
title_full_unstemmed Photosensitizers and Exposure Times To Light Showed Tissue Compatibility In Isogenic Mice
title_sort Photosensitizers and Exposure Times To Light Showed Tissue Compatibility In Isogenic Mice
author Assed Bezerra da Silva, Raquel
author_facet Assed Bezerra da Silva, Raquel
Silva Barroso de Oliveira, Daniela
Morant Holanda de Oliveira, Katharina
Pucinelli, Carolina Maschietto
Nelson Filho, Paulo
Consolaro, Alberto
Belém Novaes Jr, Arthur
Assed Bezerra da Silva, Lea
author_role author
author2 Silva Barroso de Oliveira, Daniela
Morant Holanda de Oliveira, Katharina
Pucinelli, Carolina Maschietto
Nelson Filho, Paulo
Consolaro, Alberto
Belém Novaes Jr, Arthur
Assed Bezerra da Silva, Lea
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Assed Bezerra da Silva, Raquel
Silva Barroso de Oliveira, Daniela
Morant Holanda de Oliveira, Katharina
Pucinelli, Carolina Maschietto
Nelson Filho, Paulo
Consolaro, Alberto
Belém Novaes Jr, Arthur
Assed Bezerra da Silva, Lea
description Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the subcutaneous tissue response after different protocols to photodynamic therapy (PDT). In Phase 1, were tested the diode laser (used for 1min) associated to the photosensitizer phenothiazine chloride solution (PCS) in different concentrations. In Phase 2 – the diode laser and LED were tested associated to two different photosensitizers, PCS and Curcumin, in different exposure times of light application. Material and Methods: After 7, 21 and 63-days the animals were euthanized and the subcutaneous tissue processed to histological analysis. Qualitative and semi-quantitative descriptions of the inflammatory process and immunohistochemical technique were performed. The obtained data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s post-test (alpha = 0.5). Results: On Phase 1, the tissue response was very similar among the groups. For the inflammatory infiltrate, PCS with concentration of 10mg/mL exhibited the most intense reaction (p > 0.05). On Phase 2, at 7-days period, the analyzed parameters presented small magnitude and after 21 and 63-days, all the parameters demonstrated tissue compatibility. Conclusion: Both photosensitizers presented proper tissue compatibility regardless the different concentrations used on Phase 1 and different durations of light exposure on Phase 2.   Keywords Photodynamic therapy; Phenothiazine chloride solution; Curcumin; Isogenic mice; Subcutaneous tissue.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-03-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/2340
10.14295/bds.2021.v24i2.2340
url https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/2340
identifier_str_mv 10.14295/bds.2021.v24i2.2340
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/2340/4294
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Dental Science
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Dental Science
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 24 No. 2 (2021): Apr - Jun / 2021 - published Mar 2021
Brazilian Dental Science; v. 24 n. 2 (2021): Apr - Jun / 2021 - published Mar 2021
2178-6011
reponame:Brazilian Dental Science
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Brazilian Dental Science
collection Brazilian Dental Science
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv sergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br||bds.ict@unesp.br
_version_ 1817990382507524096