Clinical longevity of metallic versus fiberglass intraradicular posts: a systematic review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Maciel, Carolina Menezes
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: Baroudi, Kusai, Oliveira, Kamilla Carolina Feitosa, dos Santos, Cleydiane, Lima, Carina Santos, Vitti, Rafael Pino
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Dental Science
Texto Completo: https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/4114
Resumo: Objective: This systematic review aims to compare the clinical longevity of metallic and fiberglass intraradicular posts in teeth with severely compromised crowns, utilizing randomized clinical trials and case reports published in the last eleven years. Material and Methods: The research was conducted on PubMed, Medline, Lilacs, and BBO databases using the first search strategy with the descriptors ‘dental posts,’ ‘longevity,’ ‘fiberglass-reinforced posts’ or ‘metallic posts.’ The second search strategy involved analyzing the references of articles identified by the first search. Both studies were carried out with stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: No statistically significant and clinically relevant differences in longevity were observed between metallic and fiberglass posts. Conclusion: The clinical success and durability of the restorative procedure using intraradicular posts primarily depend on the remaining amount around the post (ferrule), the type and position of the tooth in the arch (impacting the masticatory forces exerted on the restored tooth), and the correct application of the cementation technique. It is noteworthy that fiberglass posts offer substantial advantages by presenting a modulus of elasticity similar to dental structure, ensuring a more homogeneous distribution of masticatory forces and reducing the risk of fractures. These findings have practical implications for material selection in restorative procedures involving intraradicular posts. KEYWORDS Dental materials; Dental post; Fiberglass posts; Longevity; Post and core technique.
id UNESP-20_f1437ede8c058b93fcc76c4e246120a9
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4114
network_acronym_str UNESP-20
network_name_str Brazilian Dental Science
repository_id_str
spelling Clinical longevity of metallic versus fiberglass intraradicular posts: a systematic reviewObjective: This systematic review aims to compare the clinical longevity of metallic and fiberglass intraradicular posts in teeth with severely compromised crowns, utilizing randomized clinical trials and case reports published in the last eleven years. Material and Methods: The research was conducted on PubMed, Medline, Lilacs, and BBO databases using the first search strategy with the descriptors ‘dental posts,’ ‘longevity,’ ‘fiberglass-reinforced posts’ or ‘metallic posts.’ The second search strategy involved analyzing the references of articles identified by the first search. Both studies were carried out with stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: No statistically significant and clinically relevant differences in longevity were observed between metallic and fiberglass posts. Conclusion: The clinical success and durability of the restorative procedure using intraradicular posts primarily depend on the remaining amount around the post (ferrule), the type and position of the tooth in the arch (impacting the masticatory forces exerted on the restored tooth), and the correct application of the cementation technique. It is noteworthy that fiberglass posts offer substantial advantages by presenting a modulus of elasticity similar to dental structure, ensuring a more homogeneous distribution of masticatory forces and reducing the risk of fractures. These findings have practical implications for material selection in restorative procedures involving intraradicular posts. KEYWORDS Dental materials; Dental post; Fiberglass posts; Longevity; Post and core technique.Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos2024-01-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/411410.4322/bds.2024.e4114Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 27 No. 1 (2024): Jan - Mar / 2024 - Published Jan 2024Brazilian Dental Science; v. 27 n. 1 (2024): Jan - Mar / 2024 - Published Jan 20242178-6011reponame:Brazilian Dental Scienceinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPenghttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/4114/4704Copyright (c) 2023 Brazilian Dental Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMaciel, Carolina Menezes Baroudi, KusaiOliveira, Kamilla Carolina Feitosa dos Santos, Cleydiane Lima, Carina Santos Vitti, Rafael Pino 2024-04-01T17:45:19Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4114Revistahttp://bds.ict.unesp.br/PUBhttp://ojs.fosjc.unesp.br/index.php/index/oaisergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br2178-60112178-6011opendoar:2024-04-01T17:45:19Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Clinical longevity of metallic versus fiberglass intraradicular posts: a systematic review
title Clinical longevity of metallic versus fiberglass intraradicular posts: a systematic review
spellingShingle Clinical longevity of metallic versus fiberglass intraradicular posts: a systematic review
Maciel, Carolina Menezes
title_short Clinical longevity of metallic versus fiberglass intraradicular posts: a systematic review
title_full Clinical longevity of metallic versus fiberglass intraradicular posts: a systematic review
title_fullStr Clinical longevity of metallic versus fiberglass intraradicular posts: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Clinical longevity of metallic versus fiberglass intraradicular posts: a systematic review
title_sort Clinical longevity of metallic versus fiberglass intraradicular posts: a systematic review
author Maciel, Carolina Menezes
author_facet Maciel, Carolina Menezes
Baroudi, Kusai
Oliveira, Kamilla Carolina Feitosa
dos Santos, Cleydiane
Lima, Carina Santos
Vitti, Rafael Pino
author_role author
author2 Baroudi, Kusai
Oliveira, Kamilla Carolina Feitosa
dos Santos, Cleydiane
Lima, Carina Santos
Vitti, Rafael Pino
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Maciel, Carolina Menezes
Baroudi, Kusai
Oliveira, Kamilla Carolina Feitosa
dos Santos, Cleydiane
Lima, Carina Santos
Vitti, Rafael Pino
description Objective: This systematic review aims to compare the clinical longevity of metallic and fiberglass intraradicular posts in teeth with severely compromised crowns, utilizing randomized clinical trials and case reports published in the last eleven years. Material and Methods: The research was conducted on PubMed, Medline, Lilacs, and BBO databases using the first search strategy with the descriptors ‘dental posts,’ ‘longevity,’ ‘fiberglass-reinforced posts’ or ‘metallic posts.’ The second search strategy involved analyzing the references of articles identified by the first search. Both studies were carried out with stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: No statistically significant and clinically relevant differences in longevity were observed between metallic and fiberglass posts. Conclusion: The clinical success and durability of the restorative procedure using intraradicular posts primarily depend on the remaining amount around the post (ferrule), the type and position of the tooth in the arch (impacting the masticatory forces exerted on the restored tooth), and the correct application of the cementation technique. It is noteworthy that fiberglass posts offer substantial advantages by presenting a modulus of elasticity similar to dental structure, ensuring a more homogeneous distribution of masticatory forces and reducing the risk of fractures. These findings have practical implications for material selection in restorative procedures involving intraradicular posts. KEYWORDS Dental materials; Dental post; Fiberglass posts; Longevity; Post and core technique.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-01-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/4114
10.4322/bds.2024.e4114
url https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/4114
identifier_str_mv 10.4322/bds.2024.e4114
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/4114/4704
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Brazilian Dental Science
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Brazilian Dental Science
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 27 No. 1 (2024): Jan - Mar / 2024 - Published Jan 2024
Brazilian Dental Science; v. 27 n. 1 (2024): Jan - Mar / 2024 - Published Jan 2024
2178-6011
reponame:Brazilian Dental Science
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Brazilian Dental Science
collection Brazilian Dental Science
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv sergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br
_version_ 1800214394595966976