Clinical longevity of metallic versus fiberglass intraradicular posts: a systematic review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Dental Science |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/4114 |
Resumo: | Objective: This systematic review aims to compare the clinical longevity of metallic and fiberglass intraradicular posts in teeth with severely compromised crowns, utilizing randomized clinical trials and case reports published in the last eleven years. Material and Methods: The research was conducted on PubMed, Medline, Lilacs, and BBO databases using the first search strategy with the descriptors ‘dental posts,’ ‘longevity,’ ‘fiberglass-reinforced posts’ or ‘metallic posts.’ The second search strategy involved analyzing the references of articles identified by the first search. Both studies were carried out with stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: No statistically significant and clinically relevant differences in longevity were observed between metallic and fiberglass posts. Conclusion: The clinical success and durability of the restorative procedure using intraradicular posts primarily depend on the remaining amount around the post (ferrule), the type and position of the tooth in the arch (impacting the masticatory forces exerted on the restored tooth), and the correct application of the cementation technique. It is noteworthy that fiberglass posts offer substantial advantages by presenting a modulus of elasticity similar to dental structure, ensuring a more homogeneous distribution of masticatory forces and reducing the risk of fractures. These findings have practical implications for material selection in restorative procedures involving intraradicular posts. KEYWORDS Dental materials; Dental post; Fiberglass posts; Longevity; Post and core technique. |
id |
UNESP-20_f1437ede8c058b93fcc76c4e246120a9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4114 |
network_acronym_str |
UNESP-20 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Dental Science |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Clinical longevity of metallic versus fiberglass intraradicular posts: a systematic reviewObjective: This systematic review aims to compare the clinical longevity of metallic and fiberglass intraradicular posts in teeth with severely compromised crowns, utilizing randomized clinical trials and case reports published in the last eleven years. Material and Methods: The research was conducted on PubMed, Medline, Lilacs, and BBO databases using the first search strategy with the descriptors ‘dental posts,’ ‘longevity,’ ‘fiberglass-reinforced posts’ or ‘metallic posts.’ The second search strategy involved analyzing the references of articles identified by the first search. Both studies were carried out with stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: No statistically significant and clinically relevant differences in longevity were observed between metallic and fiberglass posts. Conclusion: The clinical success and durability of the restorative procedure using intraradicular posts primarily depend on the remaining amount around the post (ferrule), the type and position of the tooth in the arch (impacting the masticatory forces exerted on the restored tooth), and the correct application of the cementation technique. It is noteworthy that fiberglass posts offer substantial advantages by presenting a modulus of elasticity similar to dental structure, ensuring a more homogeneous distribution of masticatory forces and reducing the risk of fractures. These findings have practical implications for material selection in restorative procedures involving intraradicular posts. KEYWORDS Dental materials; Dental post; Fiberglass posts; Longevity; Post and core technique.Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos2024-01-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/411410.4322/bds.2024.e4114Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 27 No. 1 (2024): Jan - Mar / 2024 - Published Jan 2024Brazilian Dental Science; v. 27 n. 1 (2024): Jan - Mar / 2024 - Published Jan 20242178-6011reponame:Brazilian Dental Scienceinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPenghttps://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/4114/4704Copyright (c) 2023 Brazilian Dental Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMaciel, Carolina Menezes Baroudi, KusaiOliveira, Kamilla Carolina Feitosa dos Santos, Cleydiane Lima, Carina Santos Vitti, Rafael Pino 2024-04-01T17:45:19Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4114Revistahttp://bds.ict.unesp.br/PUBhttp://ojs.fosjc.unesp.br/index.php/index/oaisergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br2178-60112178-6011opendoar:2024-04-01T17:45:19Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinical longevity of metallic versus fiberglass intraradicular posts: a systematic review |
title |
Clinical longevity of metallic versus fiberglass intraradicular posts: a systematic review |
spellingShingle |
Clinical longevity of metallic versus fiberglass intraradicular posts: a systematic review Maciel, Carolina Menezes |
title_short |
Clinical longevity of metallic versus fiberglass intraradicular posts: a systematic review |
title_full |
Clinical longevity of metallic versus fiberglass intraradicular posts: a systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Clinical longevity of metallic versus fiberglass intraradicular posts: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Clinical longevity of metallic versus fiberglass intraradicular posts: a systematic review |
title_sort |
Clinical longevity of metallic versus fiberglass intraradicular posts: a systematic review |
author |
Maciel, Carolina Menezes |
author_facet |
Maciel, Carolina Menezes Baroudi, Kusai Oliveira, Kamilla Carolina Feitosa dos Santos, Cleydiane Lima, Carina Santos Vitti, Rafael Pino |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Baroudi, Kusai Oliveira, Kamilla Carolina Feitosa dos Santos, Cleydiane Lima, Carina Santos Vitti, Rafael Pino |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Maciel, Carolina Menezes Baroudi, Kusai Oliveira, Kamilla Carolina Feitosa dos Santos, Cleydiane Lima, Carina Santos Vitti, Rafael Pino |
description |
Objective: This systematic review aims to compare the clinical longevity of metallic and fiberglass intraradicular posts in teeth with severely compromised crowns, utilizing randomized clinical trials and case reports published in the last eleven years. Material and Methods: The research was conducted on PubMed, Medline, Lilacs, and BBO databases using the first search strategy with the descriptors ‘dental posts,’ ‘longevity,’ ‘fiberglass-reinforced posts’ or ‘metallic posts.’ The second search strategy involved analyzing the references of articles identified by the first search. Both studies were carried out with stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: No statistically significant and clinically relevant differences in longevity were observed between metallic and fiberglass posts. Conclusion: The clinical success and durability of the restorative procedure using intraradicular posts primarily depend on the remaining amount around the post (ferrule), the type and position of the tooth in the arch (impacting the masticatory forces exerted on the restored tooth), and the correct application of the cementation technique. It is noteworthy that fiberglass posts offer substantial advantages by presenting a modulus of elasticity similar to dental structure, ensuring a more homogeneous distribution of masticatory forces and reducing the risk of fractures. These findings have practical implications for material selection in restorative procedures involving intraradicular posts. KEYWORDS Dental materials; Dental post; Fiberglass posts; Longevity; Post and core technique. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-01-03 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/4114 10.4322/bds.2024.e4114 |
url |
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/4114 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4322/bds.2024.e4114 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.ict.unesp.br/index.php/cob/article/view/4114/4704 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Brazilian Dental Science info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Brazilian Dental Science |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Dental Science; Vol. 27 No. 1 (2024): Jan - Mar / 2024 - Published Jan 2024 Brazilian Dental Science; v. 27 n. 1 (2024): Jan - Mar / 2024 - Published Jan 2024 2178-6011 reponame:Brazilian Dental Science instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Dental Science |
collection |
Brazilian Dental Science |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Dental Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
sergio@fosjc.unesp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br |
_version_ |
1800214394595966976 |