Systematic literature review about knowledge risks

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lima, João Sérgio
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Alvares, Lillian, Leonardi, Rodrigo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Information Science
Texto Completo: https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/13699
Resumo: Knowledge risk management has been developing as a new area of ​​research related to knowledge management and intellectual capital. Although scientific interest in the topic has grown in recent years, it is still necessary to know the informational risks involved in the production processes, in this sense, the objective of this article is to present a Systematic Review of the different types of Knowledge Risks found in the literature. As a methodological procedure to conduct SLR, the guidelines of Xiao & Watson (2017) were followed, which establish eight steps for conducting a literature review. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 24 documents were selected. As a result, it was possible to consolidate the main risks mentioned in the selected documents, namely, Knowledge Loss; Knowledge Leakage; Knowledge Spillover; Knowledge Attrition; Knowledge Hiding; Knowledge Hoarding; Knowledge Outsourcing; and Knowledge Gaps. In conclusion, it is possible to affirm that it is necessary to go deeper into Knowledge Risks, ideally by more researchers who may become interested in the topic.
id UNESP-31_a8abc48c3c70064b7ace92e7da785395
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/13699
network_acronym_str UNESP-31
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Information Science
repository_id_str
spelling Systematic literature review about knowledge risksRevisão Sistemática da Literatura sobre Riscos de ConhecimentoKnowledge RisksKnowledge managementSystematic Literature ReviewRiscos de conhecimentoGestão do conhecimentoRevisão Sistemática de LiteraturaKnowledge risk management has been developing as a new area of ​​research related to knowledge management and intellectual capital. Although scientific interest in the topic has grown in recent years, it is still necessary to know the informational risks involved in the production processes, in this sense, the objective of this article is to present a Systematic Review of the different types of Knowledge Risks found in the literature. As a methodological procedure to conduct SLR, the guidelines of Xiao & Watson (2017) were followed, which establish eight steps for conducting a literature review. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 24 documents were selected. As a result, it was possible to consolidate the main risks mentioned in the selected documents, namely, Knowledge Loss; Knowledge Leakage; Knowledge Spillover; Knowledge Attrition; Knowledge Hiding; Knowledge Hoarding; Knowledge Outsourcing; and Knowledge Gaps. In conclusion, it is possible to affirm that it is necessary to go deeper into Knowledge Risks, ideally by more researchers who may become interested in the topic.A gestão dos riscos de conhecimento vem se desenvolvendo como uma nova área de pesquisa relacionada à gestão do conhecimento e ao capital intelectual. Apesar do interesse científico pelo tema ter crescido nos últimos anos, ainda se faz necessário conhecer os riscos informacionais envolvidos nos processos de produção, de modo que o objetivo deste artigo é apresentar uma Revisão Sistemática dos distintos tipos de riscos de conhecimento encontrados na literatura. Como procedimento metodológico para conduzir a RSL, foram seguidas as diretrizes propostas por Yu Xiao e Maria Watson, que estabelecem oito etapas para a condução de uma revisão de literatura. Após a aplicação dos critérios de inclusão e exclusão, foram selecionados 24 documentos. Como resultado foi possível consolidar os principais riscos mencionados nos documentos selecionados, quais sejam, perda de conhecimento; vazamento de conhecimento; transbordamento de conhecimento; desgaste do conhecimento; ocultação do conhecimento; acúmulo de conhecimento; terceirização do conhecimento e lacunas de conhecimento. Como conclusão é possível afirmar que é necessário maior aprofundamento acerca dos riscos de conhecimento, idealmente por mais pesquisadores que venham a se interessar pelo tema.Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências - UNESP-Marília2023-04-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/1369910.36311/1981-1640.2023.v17.e023022Brazilian Journal of Information Science: research trends; v. 17 (2023): Publicação contínua; e023022Brazilian Journal of Information Science: Research Trends; Vol. 17 (2023): Publicação contínua; e023022Brazilian Journal of Information Science: Research Trends; Vol. 17 (2023): Publicação contínua; e0230221981-16401981-1640reponame:Brazilian Journal of Information Scienceinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/13699/12968https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/13699/12969Copyright (c) 2023 João Sérgio Lima, Lillian Alvares, Rodrigo Leonardihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLima, João SérgioAlvares, LillianLeonardi, Rodrigo2023-08-28T19:58:57Zoai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/13699Revistahttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/indexPUBhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/oaibrajis.marilia@unesp.br||1981-16401981-1640opendoar:2023-08-28T19:58:57Brazilian Journal of Information Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Systematic literature review about knowledge risks
Revisão Sistemática da Literatura sobre Riscos de Conhecimento
title Systematic literature review about knowledge risks
spellingShingle Systematic literature review about knowledge risks
Lima, João Sérgio
Knowledge Risks
Knowledge management
Systematic Literature Review
Riscos de conhecimento
Gestão do conhecimento
Revisão Sistemática de Literatura
title_short Systematic literature review about knowledge risks
title_full Systematic literature review about knowledge risks
title_fullStr Systematic literature review about knowledge risks
title_full_unstemmed Systematic literature review about knowledge risks
title_sort Systematic literature review about knowledge risks
author Lima, João Sérgio
author_facet Lima, João Sérgio
Alvares, Lillian
Leonardi, Rodrigo
author_role author
author2 Alvares, Lillian
Leonardi, Rodrigo
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lima, João Sérgio
Alvares, Lillian
Leonardi, Rodrigo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Knowledge Risks
Knowledge management
Systematic Literature Review
Riscos de conhecimento
Gestão do conhecimento
Revisão Sistemática de Literatura
topic Knowledge Risks
Knowledge management
Systematic Literature Review
Riscos de conhecimento
Gestão do conhecimento
Revisão Sistemática de Literatura
description Knowledge risk management has been developing as a new area of ​​research related to knowledge management and intellectual capital. Although scientific interest in the topic has grown in recent years, it is still necessary to know the informational risks involved in the production processes, in this sense, the objective of this article is to present a Systematic Review of the different types of Knowledge Risks found in the literature. As a methodological procedure to conduct SLR, the guidelines of Xiao & Watson (2017) were followed, which establish eight steps for conducting a literature review. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 24 documents were selected. As a result, it was possible to consolidate the main risks mentioned in the selected documents, namely, Knowledge Loss; Knowledge Leakage; Knowledge Spillover; Knowledge Attrition; Knowledge Hiding; Knowledge Hoarding; Knowledge Outsourcing; and Knowledge Gaps. In conclusion, it is possible to affirm that it is necessary to go deeper into Knowledge Risks, ideally by more researchers who may become interested in the topic.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-04-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/13699
10.36311/1981-1640.2023.v17.e023022
url https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/13699
identifier_str_mv 10.36311/1981-1640.2023.v17.e023022
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/13699/12968
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/13699/12969
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 João Sérgio Lima, Lillian Alvares, Rodrigo Leonardi
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 João Sérgio Lima, Lillian Alvares, Rodrigo Leonardi
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências - UNESP-Marília
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências - UNESP-Marília
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Information Science: research trends; v. 17 (2023): Publicação contínua; e023022
Brazilian Journal of Information Science: Research Trends; Vol. 17 (2023): Publicação contínua; e023022
Brazilian Journal of Information Science: Research Trends; Vol. 17 (2023): Publicação contínua; e023022
1981-1640
1981-1640
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Information Science
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Information Science
collection Brazilian Journal of Information Science
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Information Science - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv brajis.marilia@unesp.br||
_version_ 1797069096998666240