Reflections on biopolytics, violence and terrorism
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Aurora (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/article/view/7652 |
Resumo: | The bipolitics is characterized by the relation of politics to the biological body of the person who is subject to a sovereign power. The increasing delimitation of the territorial State through policies of border control and the extension of its right of surveillance is the immediate consequence of the securitization of international relations, since the discourse against the enemy of the state is also seen as a device of biopower, which inserts lines of action and control into state policies. This security discourse transfers issues from the political plane to the security agenda, which now has the legitimacy to act with prohibitive norms and rules, and the use of force is an ever-present possibility. War power ended up being unequally divided between countries and within countries - and the monopoly of force is no longer only to the state, although only the state can legitimately use it. In this context, the phenomenon of terrorism is characterized by a method of political action because it is based on national and social demands, but can also manifest as a logic of action, since it defines the actor and gives the mobility of the struggle, generating extreme violence and the order of ends and means is reversed. Thus, this essay intends to explore some initial theoretical considerations on the biopolitical theme of violence and the issue of international terrorism. |
id |
UNESP-32_242b2b99c3ed1945b2382395486178cc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/7652 |
network_acronym_str |
UNESP-32 |
network_name_str |
Revista Aurora (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Reflections on biopolytics, violence and terrorismReflexões sobre biopolítica, violência e terrorismoTerrorismoBiopolíticaViolênciaSociedadeTerrorismBiopoliticsViolenceSocietyThe bipolitics is characterized by the relation of politics to the biological body of the person who is subject to a sovereign power. The increasing delimitation of the territorial State through policies of border control and the extension of its right of surveillance is the immediate consequence of the securitization of international relations, since the discourse against the enemy of the state is also seen as a device of biopower, which inserts lines of action and control into state policies. This security discourse transfers issues from the political plane to the security agenda, which now has the legitimacy to act with prohibitive norms and rules, and the use of force is an ever-present possibility. War power ended up being unequally divided between countries and within countries - and the monopoly of force is no longer only to the state, although only the state can legitimately use it. In this context, the phenomenon of terrorism is characterized by a method of political action because it is based on national and social demands, but can also manifest as a logic of action, since it defines the actor and gives the mobility of the struggle, generating extreme violence and the order of ends and means is reversed. Thus, this essay intends to explore some initial theoretical considerations on the biopolitical theme of violence and the issue of international terrorism.A bipolítica do poder caracteriza-se pela relação da política com o corpo biológico da pessoa que está submetida a um poder soberano. A delimitação cada vez maior do Estado territorial através de políticas de controle de fronteiras e da ampliação de seu direito de vigilância é a consequência imediata da securitização das relações internacionais, já que o discurso contra o inimigo estatal também é visto como um dispositivo de biopoder, que insere nas políticas estatais as linhas de ação e controle. Esse discurso da segurança transfere questões do plano político para a agenda de segurança, que agora tem a legitimidade de agir com normas e regras proibitivas e o emprego da força é uma possibilidade sempre presente.Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências2018-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/article/view/765210.36311/1982-8004.2017.v10n2.06.p83Revista Aurora; v. 10 n. 2 (2017); 83-94Revista Aurora; Vol. 10 No. 2 (2017); 83-94Revista Aurora; Vol. 10 Núm. 2 (2017); 83-941982-80042177-0484reponame:Revista Aurora (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/article/view/7652/4859Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Aurorahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessColombo, Letícia dos Santos2024-04-02T20:59:35Zoai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/7652Revistahttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/indexPUBhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/oaiaurora.revista@gmail.com||1982-80041982-8004opendoar:2024-04-02T20:59:35Revista Aurora (Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Reflections on biopolytics, violence and terrorism Reflexões sobre biopolítica, violência e terrorismo |
title |
Reflections on biopolytics, violence and terrorism |
spellingShingle |
Reflections on biopolytics, violence and terrorism Colombo, Letícia dos Santos Terrorismo Biopolítica Violência Sociedade Terrorism Biopolitics Violence Society |
title_short |
Reflections on biopolytics, violence and terrorism |
title_full |
Reflections on biopolytics, violence and terrorism |
title_fullStr |
Reflections on biopolytics, violence and terrorism |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reflections on biopolytics, violence and terrorism |
title_sort |
Reflections on biopolytics, violence and terrorism |
author |
Colombo, Letícia dos Santos |
author_facet |
Colombo, Letícia dos Santos |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Colombo, Letícia dos Santos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Terrorismo Biopolítica Violência Sociedade Terrorism Biopolitics Violence Society |
topic |
Terrorismo Biopolítica Violência Sociedade Terrorism Biopolitics Violence Society |
description |
The bipolitics is characterized by the relation of politics to the biological body of the person who is subject to a sovereign power. The increasing delimitation of the territorial State through policies of border control and the extension of its right of surveillance is the immediate consequence of the securitization of international relations, since the discourse against the enemy of the state is also seen as a device of biopower, which inserts lines of action and control into state policies. This security discourse transfers issues from the political plane to the security agenda, which now has the legitimacy to act with prohibitive norms and rules, and the use of force is an ever-present possibility. War power ended up being unequally divided between countries and within countries - and the monopoly of force is no longer only to the state, although only the state can legitimately use it. In this context, the phenomenon of terrorism is characterized by a method of political action because it is based on national and social demands, but can also manifest as a logic of action, since it defines the actor and gives the mobility of the struggle, generating extreme violence and the order of ends and means is reversed. Thus, this essay intends to explore some initial theoretical considerations on the biopolitical theme of violence and the issue of international terrorism. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-03-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/article/view/7652 10.36311/1982-8004.2017.v10n2.06.p83 |
url |
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/article/view/7652 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.36311/1982-8004.2017.v10n2.06.p83 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/article/view/7652/4859 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Aurora https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Aurora https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Aurora; v. 10 n. 2 (2017); 83-94 Revista Aurora; Vol. 10 No. 2 (2017); 83-94 Revista Aurora; Vol. 10 Núm. 2 (2017); 83-94 1982-8004 2177-0484 reponame:Revista Aurora (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Revista Aurora (Online) |
collection |
Revista Aurora (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Aurora (Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
aurora.revista@gmail.com|| |
_version_ |
1797053557983150080 |