Reflections on biopolytics, violence and terrorism

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Colombo, Letícia dos Santos
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Aurora (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/article/view/7652
Resumo: The bipolitics is characterized by the relation of politics to the biological body of the person who is subject to a sovereign power. The increasing delimitation of the territorial State through policies of border control and the extension of its right of surveillance is the immediate consequence of the securitization of international relations, since the discourse against the enemy of the state is also seen as a device of biopower, which inserts lines of action and control into state policies. This security discourse transfers issues from the political plane to the security agenda, which now has the legitimacy to act with prohibitive norms and rules, and the use of force is an ever-present possibility. War power ended up being unequally divided between countries and within countries - and the monopoly of force is no longer only to the state, although only the state can legitimately use it. In this context, the phenomenon of terrorism is characterized by a method of political action because it is based on national and social demands, but can also manifest as a logic of action, since it defines the actor and gives the mobility of the struggle, generating extreme violence and the order of ends and means is reversed. Thus, this essay intends to explore some initial theoretical considerations on the biopolitical theme of violence and the issue of international terrorism.
id UNESP-32_242b2b99c3ed1945b2382395486178cc
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/7652
network_acronym_str UNESP-32
network_name_str Revista Aurora (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Reflections on biopolytics, violence and terrorismReflexões sobre biopolítica, violência e terrorismoTerrorismoBiopolíticaViolênciaSociedadeTerrorismBiopoliticsViolenceSocietyThe bipolitics is characterized by the relation of politics to the biological body of the person who is subject to a sovereign power. The increasing delimitation of the territorial State through policies of border control and the extension of its right of surveillance is the immediate consequence of the securitization of international relations, since the discourse against the enemy of the state is also seen as a device of biopower, which inserts lines of action and control into state policies. This security discourse transfers issues from the political plane to the security agenda, which now has the legitimacy to act with prohibitive norms and rules, and the use of force is an ever-present possibility. War power ended up being unequally divided between countries and within countries - and the monopoly of force is no longer only to the state, although only the state can legitimately use it. In this context, the phenomenon of terrorism is characterized by a method of political action because it is based on national and social demands, but can also manifest as a logic of action, since it defines the actor and gives the mobility of the struggle, generating extreme violence and the order of ends and means is reversed. Thus, this essay intends to explore some initial theoretical considerations on the biopolitical theme of violence and the issue of international terrorism.A bipolítica do poder caracteriza-se pela relação da política com o corpo biológico da pessoa que está submetida a um poder soberano. A delimitação cada vez maior do Estado territorial através de políticas de controle de fronteiras e da ampliação de seu direito de vigilância é a consequência imediata da securitização das relações internacionais, já que o discurso contra o inimigo estatal também é visto como um dispositivo de biopoder, que insere nas políticas estatais as linhas de ação e controle. Esse discurso da segurança transfere questões do plano político para a agenda de segurança, que agora tem a legitimidade de agir com normas e regras proibitivas e o emprego da força é uma possibilidade sempre presente.Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências2018-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/article/view/765210.36311/1982-8004.2017.v10n2.06.p83Revista Aurora; v. 10 n. 2 (2017); 83-94Revista Aurora; Vol. 10 No. 2 (2017); 83-94Revista Aurora; Vol. 10 Núm. 2 (2017); 83-941982-80042177-0484reponame:Revista Aurora (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/article/view/7652/4859Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Aurorahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessColombo, Letícia dos Santos2024-04-02T20:59:35Zoai:ojs.revistas.marilia.unesp.br:article/7652Revistahttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/indexPUBhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/oaiaurora.revista@gmail.com||1982-80041982-8004opendoar:2024-04-02T20:59:35Revista Aurora (Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reflections on biopolytics, violence and terrorism
Reflexões sobre biopolítica, violência e terrorismo
title Reflections on biopolytics, violence and terrorism
spellingShingle Reflections on biopolytics, violence and terrorism
Colombo, Letícia dos Santos
Terrorismo
Biopolítica
Violência
Sociedade
Terrorism
Biopolitics
Violence
Society
title_short Reflections on biopolytics, violence and terrorism
title_full Reflections on biopolytics, violence and terrorism
title_fullStr Reflections on biopolytics, violence and terrorism
title_full_unstemmed Reflections on biopolytics, violence and terrorism
title_sort Reflections on biopolytics, violence and terrorism
author Colombo, Letícia dos Santos
author_facet Colombo, Letícia dos Santos
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Colombo, Letícia dos Santos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Terrorismo
Biopolítica
Violência
Sociedade
Terrorism
Biopolitics
Violence
Society
topic Terrorismo
Biopolítica
Violência
Sociedade
Terrorism
Biopolitics
Violence
Society
description The bipolitics is characterized by the relation of politics to the biological body of the person who is subject to a sovereign power. The increasing delimitation of the territorial State through policies of border control and the extension of its right of surveillance is the immediate consequence of the securitization of international relations, since the discourse against the enemy of the state is also seen as a device of biopower, which inserts lines of action and control into state policies. This security discourse transfers issues from the political plane to the security agenda, which now has the legitimacy to act with prohibitive norms and rules, and the use of force is an ever-present possibility. War power ended up being unequally divided between countries and within countries - and the monopoly of force is no longer only to the state, although only the state can legitimately use it. In this context, the phenomenon of terrorism is characterized by a method of political action because it is based on national and social demands, but can also manifest as a logic of action, since it defines the actor and gives the mobility of the struggle, generating extreme violence and the order of ends and means is reversed. Thus, this essay intends to explore some initial theoretical considerations on the biopolitical theme of violence and the issue of international terrorism.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-03-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/article/view/7652
10.36311/1982-8004.2017.v10n2.06.p83
url https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/article/view/7652
identifier_str_mv 10.36311/1982-8004.2017.v10n2.06.p83
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/aurora/article/view/7652/4859
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Aurora
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Aurora
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Aurora; v. 10 n. 2 (2017); 83-94
Revista Aurora; Vol. 10 No. 2 (2017); 83-94
Revista Aurora; Vol. 10 Núm. 2 (2017); 83-94
1982-8004
2177-0484
reponame:Revista Aurora (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Revista Aurora (Online)
collection Revista Aurora (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Aurora (Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv aurora.revista@gmail.com||
_version_ 1797053557983150080