Collaborative and individual writing in a classroom: an analysis of texts written by students of fundamental teaching
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/10477 |
Resumo: | Collaborative writing for classroom dyads is a didactic situation that places students dialoguing to build a single text through negotiation, unlike individual writing, where one usually writes alone and in silence. Affiliated to the studies proposed by Textual Genetics based on an enunciative approach, the objective of this work was to develop a comparative study with the purpose of highlighting the advantages and / or disadvantages of writing in collaboration. Three categories served as analytical parameters: A - textual extension, measured by the number of words ; B - the incidence of orthographic errors; C) the number of erasures. The study sample was defined by convenience and comprises 8 manuscripts, 4 of which are individually produced and 4 are produced in pairs. The students are in the 2nd year of elementary school in Brazil, with ages between 7 and 8 years. The data were collected respecting the ecological conditions of the school context. Analyzes have shown that, collaboratively, students write, on average, texts 34% longer than individually, produced 170% more erasures and 10% more errors than in the individual format. |
id |
UNESP-4_09ced039688785547eda8ad2bc5251fc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10477 |
network_acronym_str |
UNESP-4 |
network_name_str |
Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Collaborative and individual writing in a classroom: an analysis of texts written by students of fundamental teachingEscrita colaborativa e individual em sala de aula: uma análise de textos escritos por alunos do ensino fundamentalInteractionSchool manuscriptErrorsErasureInteraçãoManuscrito escolarErrosRasurasCollaborative writing for classroom dyads is a didactic situation that places students dialoguing to build a single text through negotiation, unlike individual writing, where one usually writes alone and in silence. Affiliated to the studies proposed by Textual Genetics based on an enunciative approach, the objective of this work was to develop a comparative study with the purpose of highlighting the advantages and / or disadvantages of writing in collaboration. Three categories served as analytical parameters: A - textual extension, measured by the number of words ; B - the incidence of orthographic errors; C) the number of erasures. The study sample was defined by convenience and comprises 8 manuscripts, 4 of which are individually produced and 4 are produced in pairs. The students are in the 2nd year of elementary school in Brazil, with ages between 7 and 8 years. The data were collected respecting the ecological conditions of the school context. Analyzes have shown that, collaboratively, students write, on average, texts 34% longer than individually, produced 170% more erasures and 10% more errors than in the individual format.A escrita colaborativa por díades em sala de aula é uma situação didática que coloca alunos dialogando para construir um único texto, ao contrário da escrita individual, em que normalmente se escreve sozinho e em silêncio. Filiado à Genética Textual, a partir de uma abordagem enunciativa, este trabalho desenvolveu um estudo comparativo com o objetivo de evidenciar as vantagens e/ou desvantagens da escrita em colaboração. Três categorias serviram de parâmetro analítico: a) a extensão textual, medida através do número de palavras; b) a incidência de erros ortográficos; c) o número de rasuras. A amostra do estudo foi definida por conveniência e compreende 8 manuscritos, sendo 4 produzidos individualmente e 4 produzidos em duplas. Os alunos são do 2o ano do ensino fundamental, com idades entre 7 e 8 anos. Os dados foram coletados durante o desenvolvimento de um projeto didático intitulado “Contos do como e do porquê” no ano de 2012 em uma escola privada, respeitando as condições ecológicas do contexto escolar. As análises mostraram que, colaborativamente, os alunos escreveram, em média, textos 34% mais longos do que individualmente, produziram 170% a mais de rasuras e 10% a mais de erros que no formato individual.UNESP2019-04-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/1047710.1590/1981-5794-1904-6ALFA: Revista de Linguística; v. 63 n. 1 (2019)1981-5794reponame:Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online)instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporenghttps://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/10477/8185https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/10477/8190Copyright (c) 2019 ALFA: Revista de Linguísticainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFelipeto, Sonia Cristina Simões2019-04-15T19:45:02Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10477Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1981-5794&lng=pt&nrm=isoPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpalfa@unesp.br1981-57940002-5216opendoar:2019-04-15T19:45:02Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Collaborative and individual writing in a classroom: an analysis of texts written by students of fundamental teaching Escrita colaborativa e individual em sala de aula: uma análise de textos escritos por alunos do ensino fundamental |
title |
Collaborative and individual writing in a classroom: an analysis of texts written by students of fundamental teaching |
spellingShingle |
Collaborative and individual writing in a classroom: an analysis of texts written by students of fundamental teaching Felipeto, Sonia Cristina Simões Interaction School manuscript Errors Erasure Interação Manuscrito escolar Erros Rasuras |
title_short |
Collaborative and individual writing in a classroom: an analysis of texts written by students of fundamental teaching |
title_full |
Collaborative and individual writing in a classroom: an analysis of texts written by students of fundamental teaching |
title_fullStr |
Collaborative and individual writing in a classroom: an analysis of texts written by students of fundamental teaching |
title_full_unstemmed |
Collaborative and individual writing in a classroom: an analysis of texts written by students of fundamental teaching |
title_sort |
Collaborative and individual writing in a classroom: an analysis of texts written by students of fundamental teaching |
author |
Felipeto, Sonia Cristina Simões |
author_facet |
Felipeto, Sonia Cristina Simões |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Felipeto, Sonia Cristina Simões |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Interaction School manuscript Errors Erasure Interação Manuscrito escolar Erros Rasuras |
topic |
Interaction School manuscript Errors Erasure Interação Manuscrito escolar Erros Rasuras |
description |
Collaborative writing for classroom dyads is a didactic situation that places students dialoguing to build a single text through negotiation, unlike individual writing, where one usually writes alone and in silence. Affiliated to the studies proposed by Textual Genetics based on an enunciative approach, the objective of this work was to develop a comparative study with the purpose of highlighting the advantages and / or disadvantages of writing in collaboration. Three categories served as analytical parameters: A - textual extension, measured by the number of words ; B - the incidence of orthographic errors; C) the number of erasures. The study sample was defined by convenience and comprises 8 manuscripts, 4 of which are individually produced and 4 are produced in pairs. The students are in the 2nd year of elementary school in Brazil, with ages between 7 and 8 years. The data were collected respecting the ecological conditions of the school context. Analyzes have shown that, collaboratively, students write, on average, texts 34% longer than individually, produced 170% more erasures and 10% more errors than in the individual format. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-04-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/10477 10.1590/1981-5794-1904-6 |
url |
https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/10477 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1981-5794-1904-6 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/10477/8185 https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/10477/8190 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 ALFA: Revista de Linguística info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 ALFA: Revista de Linguística |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UNESP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UNESP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
ALFA: Revista de Linguística; v. 63 n. 1 (2019) 1981-5794 reponame:Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) |
collection |
Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
alfa@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1800214377442312192 |