The implementation of grammatical functions in Functional Discourse Grammar
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/1447 |
Resumo: | In standard FG (DIK, 1997) grammatical functions are assigned directly to the underlying representation in a more or less across the board fashion, only taking into consideration the language dependent semantic function hierarchy. This approach bypasses a number of constraints on subject assignment that may be gathered from typological data, and observed from the actual behaviour of speakers. In this contribution, we make an attempt to reinterpret FG syntactic functions in the light of the FDG model. Following ideas from Givón (1997), we propose a treatment of Subject assignment on the basis of a combination of semantic and pragmatic factors of the relevant referents and other functional aspects of underlying representations. The assignment rules adhere to the respective hierarchies as discussed in the typological literature. In our proposal, Subject (and Object) assignment are now located in the expression component, more specifically in the dynamic version of the expression rules as proposed in Bakker (2001). |
id |
UNESP-4_a797ddb24cc90585b5108e1af37b32fa |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1447 |
network_acronym_str |
UNESP-4 |
network_name_str |
Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The implementation of grammatical functions in Functional Discourse GrammarSubject AssignmentAlignmentMultifactor ApproachDynamic Expression RulesTypological HierarchiesIn standard FG (DIK, 1997) grammatical functions are assigned directly to the underlying representation in a more or less across the board fashion, only taking into consideration the language dependent semantic function hierarchy. This approach bypasses a number of constraints on subject assignment that may be gathered from typological data, and observed from the actual behaviour of speakers. In this contribution, we make an attempt to reinterpret FG syntactic functions in the light of the FDG model. Following ideas from Givón (1997), we propose a treatment of Subject assignment on the basis of a combination of semantic and pragmatic factors of the relevant referents and other functional aspects of underlying representations. The assignment rules adhere to the respective hierarchies as discussed in the typological literature. In our proposal, Subject (and Object) assignment are now located in the expression component, more specifically in the dynamic version of the expression rules as proposed in Bakker (2001).UNESP2009-05-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/1447ALFA: Revista de Linguística; v. 51 n. 2 (2007)1981-5794reponame:Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online)instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporhttps://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/1447/1156Copyright (c) 2007 ALFA: Revista de Linguísticainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBakker, DikSiewierska, Anna2013-09-09T19:39:31Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1447Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1981-5794&lng=pt&nrm=isoPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpalfa@unesp.br1981-57940002-5216opendoar:2013-09-09T19:39:31Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The implementation of grammatical functions in Functional Discourse Grammar |
title |
The implementation of grammatical functions in Functional Discourse Grammar |
spellingShingle |
The implementation of grammatical functions in Functional Discourse Grammar Bakker, Dik Subject Assignment Alignment Multifactor Approach Dynamic Expression Rules Typological Hierarchies |
title_short |
The implementation of grammatical functions in Functional Discourse Grammar |
title_full |
The implementation of grammatical functions in Functional Discourse Grammar |
title_fullStr |
The implementation of grammatical functions in Functional Discourse Grammar |
title_full_unstemmed |
The implementation of grammatical functions in Functional Discourse Grammar |
title_sort |
The implementation of grammatical functions in Functional Discourse Grammar |
author |
Bakker, Dik |
author_facet |
Bakker, Dik Siewierska, Anna |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Siewierska, Anna |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bakker, Dik Siewierska, Anna |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Subject Assignment Alignment Multifactor Approach Dynamic Expression Rules Typological Hierarchies |
topic |
Subject Assignment Alignment Multifactor Approach Dynamic Expression Rules Typological Hierarchies |
description |
In standard FG (DIK, 1997) grammatical functions are assigned directly to the underlying representation in a more or less across the board fashion, only taking into consideration the language dependent semantic function hierarchy. This approach bypasses a number of constraints on subject assignment that may be gathered from typological data, and observed from the actual behaviour of speakers. In this contribution, we make an attempt to reinterpret FG syntactic functions in the light of the FDG model. Following ideas from Givón (1997), we propose a treatment of Subject assignment on the basis of a combination of semantic and pragmatic factors of the relevant referents and other functional aspects of underlying representations. The assignment rules adhere to the respective hierarchies as discussed in the typological literature. In our proposal, Subject (and Object) assignment are now located in the expression component, more specifically in the dynamic version of the expression rules as proposed in Bakker (2001). |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-05-19 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/1447 |
url |
https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/1447 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/1447/1156 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2007 ALFA: Revista de Linguística info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2007 ALFA: Revista de Linguística |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UNESP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UNESP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
ALFA: Revista de Linguística; v. 51 n. 2 (2007) 1981-5794 reponame:Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) |
collection |
Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
alfa@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1800214373704138752 |