The dynamic implementation of non-overt arguments in nominalizations
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/1445 |
Resumo: | Valency is an inherent property of nominalizations representing higher-order entities, and as such it should be included in their underlying representation. On the basis of this assumption, I postulate that cases of non-overt arguments, which are very common in Brazilian Portuguese and in many other languages of the world, should be considered a special type of valency realization. This paper aims to give empirical support to this postulate by showing that non-overt arguments are both semantically and pragmatically motivated. The semantic and pragmatic motivations for non-overt arguments may be accounted for by the dynamic implementation of the FDG model. I argue that the way valency is realized by means of non-overt arguments suggests a strong parallelism between nominalizations and other types of non-finite embedded constructions – like infinitival and participial ones. By providing empirical evidence for this parallelism I arrive at the conclusion that there are at least three kinds of non-finite embedded constructions, rather than only two, as suggested by Dik (1997). |
id |
UNESP-4_ebbbb90ccf631625e47b47e6016bbfae |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1445 |
network_acronym_str |
UNESP-4 |
network_name_str |
Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The dynamic implementation of non-overt arguments in nominalizationsNominalizationEmbedded ConstructionsValencyOvert ArgumentNon-Overt ArgumentValency is an inherent property of nominalizations representing higher-order entities, and as such it should be included in their underlying representation. On the basis of this assumption, I postulate that cases of non-overt arguments, which are very common in Brazilian Portuguese and in many other languages of the world, should be considered a special type of valency realization. This paper aims to give empirical support to this postulate by showing that non-overt arguments are both semantically and pragmatically motivated. The semantic and pragmatic motivations for non-overt arguments may be accounted for by the dynamic implementation of the FDG model. I argue that the way valency is realized by means of non-overt arguments suggests a strong parallelism between nominalizations and other types of non-finite embedded constructions – like infinitival and participial ones. By providing empirical evidence for this parallelism I arrive at the conclusion that there are at least three kinds of non-finite embedded constructions, rather than only two, as suggested by Dik (1997).UNESP2009-05-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/1445ALFA: Revista de Linguística; v. 51 n. 2 (2007)1981-5794reponame:Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online)instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporhttps://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/1445/1154Copyright (c) 2007 ALFA: Revista de Linguísticainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCamacho, Roberto Gomes2013-09-09T19:39:31Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1445Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1981-5794&lng=pt&nrm=isoPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpalfa@unesp.br1981-57940002-5216opendoar:2013-09-09T19:39:31Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The dynamic implementation of non-overt arguments in nominalizations |
title |
The dynamic implementation of non-overt arguments in nominalizations |
spellingShingle |
The dynamic implementation of non-overt arguments in nominalizations Camacho, Roberto Gomes Nominalization Embedded Constructions Valency Overt Argument Non-Overt Argument |
title_short |
The dynamic implementation of non-overt arguments in nominalizations |
title_full |
The dynamic implementation of non-overt arguments in nominalizations |
title_fullStr |
The dynamic implementation of non-overt arguments in nominalizations |
title_full_unstemmed |
The dynamic implementation of non-overt arguments in nominalizations |
title_sort |
The dynamic implementation of non-overt arguments in nominalizations |
author |
Camacho, Roberto Gomes |
author_facet |
Camacho, Roberto Gomes |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Camacho, Roberto Gomes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Nominalization Embedded Constructions Valency Overt Argument Non-Overt Argument |
topic |
Nominalization Embedded Constructions Valency Overt Argument Non-Overt Argument |
description |
Valency is an inherent property of nominalizations representing higher-order entities, and as such it should be included in their underlying representation. On the basis of this assumption, I postulate that cases of non-overt arguments, which are very common in Brazilian Portuguese and in many other languages of the world, should be considered a special type of valency realization. This paper aims to give empirical support to this postulate by showing that non-overt arguments are both semantically and pragmatically motivated. The semantic and pragmatic motivations for non-overt arguments may be accounted for by the dynamic implementation of the FDG model. I argue that the way valency is realized by means of non-overt arguments suggests a strong parallelism between nominalizations and other types of non-finite embedded constructions – like infinitival and participial ones. By providing empirical evidence for this parallelism I arrive at the conclusion that there are at least three kinds of non-finite embedded constructions, rather than only two, as suggested by Dik (1997). |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-05-19 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/1445 |
url |
https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/1445 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/1445/1154 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2007 ALFA: Revista de Linguística info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2007 ALFA: Revista de Linguística |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UNESP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UNESP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
ALFA: Revista de Linguística; v. 51 n. 2 (2007) 1981-5794 reponame:Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) |
collection |
Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Alfa (São José do Rio Preto. Online) - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
alfa@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1800214373702041600 |