Social darwinism and alterity in United States: from the Civil War to the imperial rise

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Leite, Lucas Amaral Batista
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Perspectivas
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/perspectivas/article/view/15210
Resumo: This paper seeks to understand how certain foreign policy makers in the United States – here considered presidents and their secretaries of state – took on certain narratives as part of an ideology that distinguished between what could be considered a citizen and the “other”, considered often as inferior, barbaric or constantly dependent on aid. During this period there was also a prejudiced interpretation based on the ideas called “Social Darwinism”: the assumption that, just as among species, human beings could also be divided between races. This division clearly privileged the notion that colonized peoples and the former European colonies would not be intellectually advanced to constitute “advanced” societies, political institutions and order. We therefore want to analyze how historical and social aspects influence political factors through narratives that are perpetuated over time. This is the case of the Monroe Doctrine and the Manifest Destiny, which, even though they did not appear in the period established, occupy a fundamental role for the analysis. We assume the role of language not only as a bridge of meanings, but as an essentially political phenomenon, in which differences and prejudices are established.
id UNESP-5_6dcf67baf58cd40adf2f44aa3e1aa1b1
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/15210
network_acronym_str UNESP-5
network_name_str Perspectivas
repository_id_str
spelling Social darwinism and alterity in United States: from the Civil War to the imperial riseDarwinismo social e alteridade nos Estados Unidos: da guerra civil à construção do imperialismoUnited StatesSocial darwinismAlterityAmerican foreign policyDiscourse analysisEstados UnidosDarwinismo SocialAlteridadePolítica externa americanaAnálise do discursoThis paper seeks to understand how certain foreign policy makers in the United States – here considered presidents and their secretaries of state – took on certain narratives as part of an ideology that distinguished between what could be considered a citizen and the “other”, considered often as inferior, barbaric or constantly dependent on aid. During this period there was also a prejudiced interpretation based on the ideas called “Social Darwinism”: the assumption that, just as among species, human beings could also be divided between races. This division clearly privileged the notion that colonized peoples and the former European colonies would not be intellectually advanced to constitute “advanced” societies, political institutions and order. We therefore want to analyze how historical and social aspects influence political factors through narratives that are perpetuated over time. This is the case of the Monroe Doctrine and the Manifest Destiny, which, even though they did not appear in the period established, occupy a fundamental role for the analysis. We assume the role of language not only as a bridge of meanings, but as an essentially political phenomenon, in which differences and prejudices are established.Este artigo busca discutir como certos formuladores de política externa dos Estados Unidos - aqui considerados presidentes e secretários de Estado - assumiram determinadas narrativas como parte de uma ideologia que distinguia entre quem poderia ser considerado cidadão e o “outro”, considerado com frequência como inferior, bárbaro ou constantemente dependente da ajuda. Durante esse período, houve também uma interpretação preconceituosa, baseada em uma ideologia denominada de “darwinismo social”: a suposição de que, assim como entre as espécies, os seres humanos também poderiam ser divididos entre raças. Essa divisão claramente privilegiou a noção de que os povos colonizados e as antigas colônias europeias não seriam intelectualmente avançados para constituir sociedades “avançadas”, instituições políticas e ordem. Portanto, queremos analisar como os aspectos históricos e sociais influenciam os fatores políticos por meio de narrativas que se perpetuam ao longo do tempo. É o caso da Doutrina Monroe e do Destino Manifesto, que, apesar de não aparecerem no período estabelecido, ocupam papel fundamental para a análise. Assumimos o papel da linguagem não apenas como uma ponte de significados, mas como um fenômeno essencialmente político, no qual diferenças e preconceitos são estabelecidos.Universidade Estadual Paulista / UNESP2021-06-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/perspectivas/article/view/15210Perspectivas: Revista de Ciências Sociais; v. 54 (2019): Dossiê: Estados Unidos1984-02410101-3459reponame:Perspectivasinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporhttps://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/perspectivas/article/view/15210/10899Leite, Lucas Amaral Batista info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-06-21T13:39:47Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/15210Revistahttps://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/perspectivasPUBhttps://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/perspectivas/oai||lahuerta@fclar.unesp.br1984-02410101-3459opendoar:2021-06-21T13:39:47Perspectivas - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Social darwinism and alterity in United States: from the Civil War to the imperial rise
Darwinismo social e alteridade nos Estados Unidos: da guerra civil à construção do imperialismo
title Social darwinism and alterity in United States: from the Civil War to the imperial rise
spellingShingle Social darwinism and alterity in United States: from the Civil War to the imperial rise
Leite, Lucas Amaral Batista
United States
Social darwinism
Alterity
American foreign policy
Discourse analysis
Estados Unidos
Darwinismo Social
Alteridade
Política externa americana
Análise do discurso
title_short Social darwinism and alterity in United States: from the Civil War to the imperial rise
title_full Social darwinism and alterity in United States: from the Civil War to the imperial rise
title_fullStr Social darwinism and alterity in United States: from the Civil War to the imperial rise
title_full_unstemmed Social darwinism and alterity in United States: from the Civil War to the imperial rise
title_sort Social darwinism and alterity in United States: from the Civil War to the imperial rise
author Leite, Lucas Amaral Batista
author_facet Leite, Lucas Amaral Batista
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Leite, Lucas Amaral Batista
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv United States
Social darwinism
Alterity
American foreign policy
Discourse analysis
Estados Unidos
Darwinismo Social
Alteridade
Política externa americana
Análise do discurso
topic United States
Social darwinism
Alterity
American foreign policy
Discourse analysis
Estados Unidos
Darwinismo Social
Alteridade
Política externa americana
Análise do discurso
description This paper seeks to understand how certain foreign policy makers in the United States – here considered presidents and their secretaries of state – took on certain narratives as part of an ideology that distinguished between what could be considered a citizen and the “other”, considered often as inferior, barbaric or constantly dependent on aid. During this period there was also a prejudiced interpretation based on the ideas called “Social Darwinism”: the assumption that, just as among species, human beings could also be divided between races. This division clearly privileged the notion that colonized peoples and the former European colonies would not be intellectually advanced to constitute “advanced” societies, political institutions and order. We therefore want to analyze how historical and social aspects influence political factors through narratives that are perpetuated over time. This is the case of the Monroe Doctrine and the Manifest Destiny, which, even though they did not appear in the period established, occupy a fundamental role for the analysis. We assume the role of language not only as a bridge of meanings, but as an essentially political phenomenon, in which differences and prejudices are established.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/perspectivas/article/view/15210
url https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/perspectivas/article/view/15210
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/perspectivas/article/view/15210/10899
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista / UNESP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista / UNESP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Perspectivas: Revista de Ciências Sociais; v. 54 (2019): Dossiê: Estados Unidos
1984-0241
0101-3459
reponame:Perspectivas
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Perspectivas
collection Perspectivas
repository.name.fl_str_mv Perspectivas - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||lahuerta@fclar.unesp.br
_version_ 1800215728389881856