A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE COUNTER-MAJORITARIAN, REPRESENTATIVE AND ENLIGHTENMENT FUNCTIONS OF THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT IN LIGHT OF THE DOCTRINE OF EFECTTIVENESS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Direitos Fundamentais e Democracia |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaeletronicardfd.unibrasil.com.br/index.php/rdfd/article/view/1915 |
Resumo: | The article intends to approach the counter-majoritarian, representative and enlightenment functions of the Supreme Court referred to by Minister Barroso's doctrine of effectiveness in securing an alleged potential for interference by the Supreme Court (STF) in the most varied questions of politics. The jurisdictional function places itself in a position to mediate the fulfillment of constitutional promises, tensioning the relationship between the functions of the State. The aim is to investigate the changes that occurred in the constitutional jurisdiction after the middle of the 20th century, as well as the overcoming or not of legal positivism by post-positivism, and whether it can be accepted as a jusphilosophical paradigm of the new Constitutional Law, capable of supporting judicialization politics, judicial activism, counter-majoritarian, representative and enlightenment functions of the STF. After demonstrating the overcoming of the Liberal State model by the Post-War Constitutional, it is understood that there was no overcoming of legal positivism by post-positivism. There is, in fact, a mistaken understanding of the phenomena of the judicialization of politics and judicial activism, which never intended to confer on the Judiciary functions other than counter-majoritarian, but which cannot be exercised based on moral arguments, simply because the idea of pretending to correct the legal system is incompatible with the legal system and the idea of democracy. The research will use the bibliographic, legislative and jurisprudential review on the subject, drawing on works from the Theory of Law, Political Philosophy and contemporary Constitutional Law, envisioning a dialectical analysis of the STF's performance in relation to the democratic system. |
id |
UNIBRASIL-1_15837c8c8a9f60abde27c7c2a7ebea66 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1915 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIBRASIL-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Direitos Fundamentais e Democracia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE COUNTER-MAJORITARIAN, REPRESENTATIVE AND ENLIGHTENMENT FUNCTIONS OF THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT IN LIGHT OF THE DOCTRINE OF EFECTTIVENESSUMA ANÁLISE CRÍTICA DAS FUNÇÕES CONTRAMAJORITÁRIA, REPRESENTATIVA E ILUMINISTA DO SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL (STF) À LUZ DA DOUTRINA DA EFETIVIDADEThe article intends to approach the counter-majoritarian, representative and enlightenment functions of the Supreme Court referred to by Minister Barroso's doctrine of effectiveness in securing an alleged potential for interference by the Supreme Court (STF) in the most varied questions of politics. The jurisdictional function places itself in a position to mediate the fulfillment of constitutional promises, tensioning the relationship between the functions of the State. The aim is to investigate the changes that occurred in the constitutional jurisdiction after the middle of the 20th century, as well as the overcoming or not of legal positivism by post-positivism, and whether it can be accepted as a jusphilosophical paradigm of the new Constitutional Law, capable of supporting judicialization politics, judicial activism, counter-majoritarian, representative and enlightenment functions of the STF. After demonstrating the overcoming of the Liberal State model by the Post-War Constitutional, it is understood that there was no overcoming of legal positivism by post-positivism. There is, in fact, a mistaken understanding of the phenomena of the judicialization of politics and judicial activism, which never intended to confer on the Judiciary functions other than counter-majoritarian, but which cannot be exercised based on moral arguments, simply because the idea of pretending to correct the legal system is incompatible with the legal system and the idea of democracy. The research will use the bibliographic, legislative and jurisprudential review on the subject, drawing on works from the Theory of Law, Political Philosophy and contemporary Constitutional Law, envisioning a dialectical analysis of the STF's performance in relation to the democratic system.O artigo pretende realizar uma abordagem das funções contramajoritária, representativa e iluminista do Suprema Corte a que se refere a doutrina da efetividade do ministro Barroso ao afiançar uma pretensa potencialidade de ingerência do STF nas mais variadas questões da política. A função jurisdicional se coloca numa posição de mediadora da realização das promessas constitucionais, tensionando a relação entre as funções do Estado. Procura-se investigar as mudanças ocorridas na jurisdição constitucional após a metade do século XX, bem como a superação ou não do positivismo jurídico pelo pós-positivismo, e se este pode ser aceito como paradigma jusfilosófico do novo Direito Constitucional, hábil a embasar a judicialização da política, o ativismo judicial, as funções contramajoritária, representativa e iluminista do STF. Após demonstrar a superação do modelo de Estado Liberal pelo Constitucional do Pós-Guerra, entende-se que não houve a superação do positivismo jurídico pelo pós-positivismo. Há, na verdade, uma compreensão equivocada dos fenômenos da judicialização da política e do ativismo judicial, que nunca pretenderam conferir ao Judiciário funções outras que não a contramajoritária, mas que não pode ser exercida a partir de argumentos morais, pelo simples fato de que a ideia de pretensão de correção do sistema jurídico é incompatível com o sistema jurídico e com a ideia de democracia. A pesquisa se utilizará da revisão bibliográfica, legislativa e jurisprudencial sobre o assunto, valendo-se de obras da Teoria do Direito, da Filosofia Política e do Direito Constitucional contemporâneo, vislumbrando uma análise dialética sobre a atuação do STF em relação ao sistema democrático.Centro Universitário Autônomo do Brasil2022-12-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaeletronicardfd.unibrasil.com.br/index.php/rdfd/article/view/191510.25192/issn.1982-0496.rdfd.v27i31915Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia; v. 27 n. 3 (2022): Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia; 124-153Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia; Vol. 27 No. 3 (2022): Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia; 124-1531982-0496reponame:Revista Direitos Fundamentais e Democraciainstname:Centro Universitário Autônomo do Brasil (UniBrasil)instacron:UNIBRASILporhttps://revistaeletronicardfd.unibrasil.com.br/index.php/rdfd/article/view/1915/757Copyright (c) 2022 Dr. João Paulo Alain, Júlio Cesar Lobo, Pedro Rafaelhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFernandes de Souza Allain Teixeira, João PauloMatias Lobo, Julio CesarDeocleciano, Pedro Rafael2022-12-22T14:30:03Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1915Revistahttp://revistaeletronicardfd.unibrasil.com.br/index.php/rdfdONGhttps://revistaeletronicardfd.unibrasil.com.br/index.php/rdfd/oairevistadfd@unibrasil.com.br||ebgomes@me.com1982-04961982-0496opendoar:2022-12-22T14:30:03Revista Direitos Fundamentais e Democracia - Centro Universitário Autônomo do Brasil (UniBrasil)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE COUNTER-MAJORITARIAN, REPRESENTATIVE AND ENLIGHTENMENT FUNCTIONS OF THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT IN LIGHT OF THE DOCTRINE OF EFECTTIVENESS UMA ANÁLISE CRÍTICA DAS FUNÇÕES CONTRAMAJORITÁRIA, REPRESENTATIVA E ILUMINISTA DO SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL (STF) À LUZ DA DOUTRINA DA EFETIVIDADE |
title |
A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE COUNTER-MAJORITARIAN, REPRESENTATIVE AND ENLIGHTENMENT FUNCTIONS OF THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT IN LIGHT OF THE DOCTRINE OF EFECTTIVENESS |
spellingShingle |
A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE COUNTER-MAJORITARIAN, REPRESENTATIVE AND ENLIGHTENMENT FUNCTIONS OF THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT IN LIGHT OF THE DOCTRINE OF EFECTTIVENESS Fernandes de Souza Allain Teixeira, João Paulo |
title_short |
A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE COUNTER-MAJORITARIAN, REPRESENTATIVE AND ENLIGHTENMENT FUNCTIONS OF THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT IN LIGHT OF THE DOCTRINE OF EFECTTIVENESS |
title_full |
A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE COUNTER-MAJORITARIAN, REPRESENTATIVE AND ENLIGHTENMENT FUNCTIONS OF THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT IN LIGHT OF THE DOCTRINE OF EFECTTIVENESS |
title_fullStr |
A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE COUNTER-MAJORITARIAN, REPRESENTATIVE AND ENLIGHTENMENT FUNCTIONS OF THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT IN LIGHT OF THE DOCTRINE OF EFECTTIVENESS |
title_full_unstemmed |
A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE COUNTER-MAJORITARIAN, REPRESENTATIVE AND ENLIGHTENMENT FUNCTIONS OF THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT IN LIGHT OF THE DOCTRINE OF EFECTTIVENESS |
title_sort |
A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE COUNTER-MAJORITARIAN, REPRESENTATIVE AND ENLIGHTENMENT FUNCTIONS OF THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT IN LIGHT OF THE DOCTRINE OF EFECTTIVENESS |
author |
Fernandes de Souza Allain Teixeira, João Paulo |
author_facet |
Fernandes de Souza Allain Teixeira, João Paulo Matias Lobo, Julio Cesar Deocleciano, Pedro Rafael |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Matias Lobo, Julio Cesar Deocleciano, Pedro Rafael |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fernandes de Souza Allain Teixeira, João Paulo Matias Lobo, Julio Cesar Deocleciano, Pedro Rafael |
description |
The article intends to approach the counter-majoritarian, representative and enlightenment functions of the Supreme Court referred to by Minister Barroso's doctrine of effectiveness in securing an alleged potential for interference by the Supreme Court (STF) in the most varied questions of politics. The jurisdictional function places itself in a position to mediate the fulfillment of constitutional promises, tensioning the relationship between the functions of the State. The aim is to investigate the changes that occurred in the constitutional jurisdiction after the middle of the 20th century, as well as the overcoming or not of legal positivism by post-positivism, and whether it can be accepted as a jusphilosophical paradigm of the new Constitutional Law, capable of supporting judicialization politics, judicial activism, counter-majoritarian, representative and enlightenment functions of the STF. After demonstrating the overcoming of the Liberal State model by the Post-War Constitutional, it is understood that there was no overcoming of legal positivism by post-positivism. There is, in fact, a mistaken understanding of the phenomena of the judicialization of politics and judicial activism, which never intended to confer on the Judiciary functions other than counter-majoritarian, but which cannot be exercised based on moral arguments, simply because the idea of pretending to correct the legal system is incompatible with the legal system and the idea of democracy. The research will use the bibliographic, legislative and jurisprudential review on the subject, drawing on works from the Theory of Law, Political Philosophy and contemporary Constitutional Law, envisioning a dialectical analysis of the STF's performance in relation to the democratic system. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-12-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaeletronicardfd.unibrasil.com.br/index.php/rdfd/article/view/1915 10.25192/issn.1982-0496.rdfd.v27i31915 |
url |
https://revistaeletronicardfd.unibrasil.com.br/index.php/rdfd/article/view/1915 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.25192/issn.1982-0496.rdfd.v27i31915 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaeletronicardfd.unibrasil.com.br/index.php/rdfd/article/view/1915/757 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Dr. João Paulo Alain, Júlio Cesar Lobo, Pedro Rafael https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Dr. João Paulo Alain, Júlio Cesar Lobo, Pedro Rafael https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro Universitário Autônomo do Brasil |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro Universitário Autônomo do Brasil |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia; v. 27 n. 3 (2022): Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia; 124-153 Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia; Vol. 27 No. 3 (2022): Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia; 124-153 1982-0496 reponame:Revista Direitos Fundamentais e Democracia instname:Centro Universitário Autônomo do Brasil (UniBrasil) instacron:UNIBRASIL |
instname_str |
Centro Universitário Autônomo do Brasil (UniBrasil) |
instacron_str |
UNIBRASIL |
institution |
UNIBRASIL |
reponame_str |
Revista Direitos Fundamentais e Democracia |
collection |
Revista Direitos Fundamentais e Democracia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direitos Fundamentais e Democracia - Centro Universitário Autônomo do Brasil (UniBrasil) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistadfd@unibrasil.com.br||ebgomes@me.com |
_version_ |
1800216470920101888 |