RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN NORTH AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE: BETWEEN ABSOLUTISTS AND NONPREFERENTIALISTS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bobrzyk, Sandro
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Neto, Eugênio Facchini
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Direitos Fundamentais e Democracia
Texto Completo: https://revistaeletronicardfd.unibrasil.com.br/index.php/rdfd/article/view/2403
Resumo: This article analyzes the jurisprudence of the US Supreme Court on religious freedom, which takes root in the formation of the United States, and is guaranteed in the First Amendment to the Constitution. Two clauses can be drawn from this Amendment: the Establishment clause, which imposes the separation of state and religion, and the Free exercise clause, which states that the government may not interfere with the religious practices of individuals. In relation to the first, two understandings are identified that interspersed over time: that of the absolutists, in favor of a strict separation between the State and any religious manifestation, and that of the nonpreferentialists, who admit a softer separation between these sectors. The first current predominated over time, but the second has achieved important victories in recent decades, especially in some of the five aspects in which the theme was divided. Basic research methodology was used regarding the purpose, descriptive regarding the objectives, qualitative regarding the approach, and bibliographical regarding the procedure.
id UNIBRASIL-1_a57b67c55036c5686af581e8afdd402f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2403
network_acronym_str UNIBRASIL-1
network_name_str Revista Direitos Fundamentais e Democracia
repository_id_str
spelling RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN NORTH AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE: BETWEEN ABSOLUTISTS AND NONPREFERENTIALISTSLIBERDADE RELIGIOSA NA JURISPRUDÊNCIA CONSTITUCIONAL NORTE-AMERICANA: ENTRE ABSOLUTISTS E NONPREFERENTIALISTSThis article analyzes the jurisprudence of the US Supreme Court on religious freedom, which takes root in the formation of the United States, and is guaranteed in the First Amendment to the Constitution. Two clauses can be drawn from this Amendment: the Establishment clause, which imposes the separation of state and religion, and the Free exercise clause, which states that the government may not interfere with the religious practices of individuals. In relation to the first, two understandings are identified that interspersed over time: that of the absolutists, in favor of a strict separation between the State and any religious manifestation, and that of the nonpreferentialists, who admit a softer separation between these sectors. The first current predominated over time, but the second has achieved important victories in recent decades, especially in some of the five aspects in which the theme was divided. Basic research methodology was used regarding the purpose, descriptive regarding the objectives, qualitative regarding the approach, and bibliographical regarding the procedure.O presente artigo analisa a jurisprudência da Suprema Corte norte-americana sobre a liberdade religiosa, que deita raízes na formação dos Estados Unidos, encontrando-se garantida na Primeira Emenda à Constituição. Desta se extraem duas cláusulas: Establishment clause, que impõe a separação entre Estado e religião, e Free exercise clause, que estabelece que o governo não pode interferir nas práticas religiosas dos indivíduos. Em relação à primeira, identificam-se dois entendimentos que se intercalaram ao longo do tempo: dos absolutists, partidários de uma rigorosa separação entre Estado e qualquer manifestação religiosa, e dos nonpreferentialists, que admitem uma separação mais branda entre esses setores. A primeira corrente predominou ao longo do tempo, mas a segunda vem conseguindo importantes vitórias nas últimas décadas, especialmente em alguns dos cinco aspectos em que o tema foi dividido. Utilizou-se, neste artigo, metodologia de pesquisa básica quanto à finalidade, descritiva quanto aos objetivos, qualitativa quanto à abordagem e bibliográfica quanto ao procedimento.Centro Universitário Autônomo do Brasil2023-12-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaeletronicardfd.unibrasil.com.br/index.php/rdfd/article/view/240310.25192/issn.1982-0496.rdfd v28i32403Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia; v. 28 n. 3 (2023): Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia; 222-251Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia; Vol. 28 No. 3 (2023): Fundamental Rights & Democracy Journal; 222-2511982-0496reponame:Revista Direitos Fundamentais e Democraciainstname:Centro Universitário Autônomo do Brasil (UniBrasil)instacron:UNIBRASILporhttps://revistaeletronicardfd.unibrasil.com.br/index.php/rdfd/article/view/2403/798Copyright (c) 2023 Sandro Bobrzyk, Eugênio Facchinihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBobrzyk, SandroNeto, Eugênio Facchini2023-12-20T17:35:53Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/2403Revistahttp://revistaeletronicardfd.unibrasil.com.br/index.php/rdfdONGhttps://revistaeletronicardfd.unibrasil.com.br/index.php/rdfd/oairevistadfd@unibrasil.com.br||ebgomes@me.com1982-04961982-0496opendoar:2023-12-20T17:35:53Revista Direitos Fundamentais e Democracia - Centro Universitário Autônomo do Brasil (UniBrasil)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN NORTH AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE: BETWEEN ABSOLUTISTS AND NONPREFERENTIALISTS
LIBERDADE RELIGIOSA NA JURISPRUDÊNCIA CONSTITUCIONAL NORTE-AMERICANA: ENTRE ABSOLUTISTS E NONPREFERENTIALISTS
title RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN NORTH AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE: BETWEEN ABSOLUTISTS AND NONPREFERENTIALISTS
spellingShingle RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN NORTH AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE: BETWEEN ABSOLUTISTS AND NONPREFERENTIALISTS
Bobrzyk, Sandro
title_short RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN NORTH AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE: BETWEEN ABSOLUTISTS AND NONPREFERENTIALISTS
title_full RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN NORTH AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE: BETWEEN ABSOLUTISTS AND NONPREFERENTIALISTS
title_fullStr RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN NORTH AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE: BETWEEN ABSOLUTISTS AND NONPREFERENTIALISTS
title_full_unstemmed RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN NORTH AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE: BETWEEN ABSOLUTISTS AND NONPREFERENTIALISTS
title_sort RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN NORTH AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE: BETWEEN ABSOLUTISTS AND NONPREFERENTIALISTS
author Bobrzyk, Sandro
author_facet Bobrzyk, Sandro
Neto, Eugênio Facchini
author_role author
author2 Neto, Eugênio Facchini
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bobrzyk, Sandro
Neto, Eugênio Facchini
description This article analyzes the jurisprudence of the US Supreme Court on religious freedom, which takes root in the formation of the United States, and is guaranteed in the First Amendment to the Constitution. Two clauses can be drawn from this Amendment: the Establishment clause, which imposes the separation of state and religion, and the Free exercise clause, which states that the government may not interfere with the religious practices of individuals. In relation to the first, two understandings are identified that interspersed over time: that of the absolutists, in favor of a strict separation between the State and any religious manifestation, and that of the nonpreferentialists, who admit a softer separation between these sectors. The first current predominated over time, but the second has achieved important victories in recent decades, especially in some of the five aspects in which the theme was divided. Basic research methodology was used regarding the purpose, descriptive regarding the objectives, qualitative regarding the approach, and bibliographical regarding the procedure.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaeletronicardfd.unibrasil.com.br/index.php/rdfd/article/view/2403
10.25192/issn.1982-0496.rdfd v28i32403
url https://revistaeletronicardfd.unibrasil.com.br/index.php/rdfd/article/view/2403
identifier_str_mv 10.25192/issn.1982-0496.rdfd v28i32403
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaeletronicardfd.unibrasil.com.br/index.php/rdfd/article/view/2403/798
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Sandro Bobrzyk, Eugênio Facchini
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Sandro Bobrzyk, Eugênio Facchini
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro Universitário Autônomo do Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro Universitário Autônomo do Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia; v. 28 n. 3 (2023): Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia; 222-251
Revista Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia; Vol. 28 No. 3 (2023): Fundamental Rights & Democracy Journal; 222-251
1982-0496
reponame:Revista Direitos Fundamentais e Democracia
instname:Centro Universitário Autônomo do Brasil (UniBrasil)
instacron:UNIBRASIL
instname_str Centro Universitário Autônomo do Brasil (UniBrasil)
instacron_str UNIBRASIL
institution UNIBRASIL
reponame_str Revista Direitos Fundamentais e Democracia
collection Revista Direitos Fundamentais e Democracia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Direitos Fundamentais e Democracia - Centro Universitário Autônomo do Brasil (UniBrasil)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistadfd@unibrasil.com.br||ebgomes@me.com
_version_ 1800216470941073408

Registros relacionados