Between procedure and substance: political participation and the meanings of democracy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Penna, Camila
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Carvalho, Priscila Delgado de, Zanandrez, Priscila
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Opinião Pública (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8671935
Resumo: Among the literature on political culture and participatory experiences, participation has commonly been related to democratic values and the deepening of democracy. However, there is still an explanatory gap regarding how activists from different sectors of civil society think about and conceive democracy. Anchored in the question, “How do people with different trajectories of activism understand democracy?”, this article aims to provide a theoretical and empirical explanation of how citizens with different participatory experiences understand democracy and, alternatively, how they conceive non-democratic regimes. Based on analysis of the conversations produced by focus groups held in Belo Horizonte, Porto Alegre, and Montes Claros, from March to September 2019, the article will demonstrate how understandings about democracy vary depending on the profile and the links of the participants.
id UNICAMP-10_048ea380ae00d33bc6f15607116f3391
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8671935
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-10
network_name_str Opinião Pública (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Between procedure and substance: political participation and the meanings of democracyEntre el procedimiento y el fondo: la participación política y los sentidos de la democraciaEntre procedimento e substância: participação política e sentidos da democraciaParticipationDemocracyPolitical cultureParticipacíonDemocraciaCultura politicaParticipaçãoDemocraciaCultura políticaAmong the literature on political culture and participatory experiences, participation has commonly been related to democratic values and the deepening of democracy. However, there is still an explanatory gap regarding how activists from different sectors of civil society think about and conceive democracy. Anchored in the question, “How do people with different trajectories of activism understand democracy?”, this article aims to provide a theoretical and empirical explanation of how citizens with different participatory experiences understand democracy and, alternatively, how they conceive non-democratic regimes. Based on analysis of the conversations produced by focus groups held in Belo Horizonte, Porto Alegre, and Montes Claros, from March to September 2019, the article will demonstrate how understandings about democracy vary depending on the profile and the links of the participants.Entre los estudios de cultura política y experiencias participativas, la participación se ha relacionado comúnmente con los valores democráticos y la profundización de la democracia. Sin embargo, todavía existe una brecha explicativa sobre cómo los activistas de diferentes sectores de la sociedad civil piensan y conciben la democracia. Anclado en la pregunta: “¿Cómo entienden la democracia las personas con diferentes trayectorias de activismo?”, este artículo tiene como objetivo brindar subsidios teóricos y empíricos sobre cómo los ciudadanos con diversas experiencias participativas entienden la democracia y, alternativamente, cómo conciben regímenes no democráticos. A partir del análisis de las conversaciones producidas a través de grupos focales realizados en Belo Horizonte, Puerto Alegre y Montes Claros, entre marzo y septiembre de 2019, el artículo demostrará cómo los entendimientos sobre la democracia varían en función del perfil y los vínculos de los participantes.Dentre os estudos de cultura política e experiências participativas, a participação política comumente tem sido relacionada a valores democráticos e ao aprofundamento da democracia. No entanto, ainda existe uma lacuna explicativa sobre como ativistas de diferentes setores da sociedade civil pensam e concebem a democracia. Ancorado na pergunta: “Como pessoas com diferentes trajetórias de ativismo entendem a democracia?”, este artigo visa fornecer subsídios teóricos e empíricos sobre como cidadãs e cidadãos com experiências participativas diversas compreendem a democracia e, alternativamente, como concebem regimes não democráticos. A partir de análises das conversas produzidas por grupo focais realizados em Belo Horizonte, Porto Alegre e Montes Claros, entre os meses de março e setembro de 2019, o artigo demonstra como os entendimentos sobre democracia variam a depender do perfil e dos vínculos dos participantes.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2023-01-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8671935Opinião Pública; Vol. 28 No. 3 (2022): set./dez.; 678-715Opinião Pública; Vol. 28 Núm. 3 (2022): set./dez.; 678-715Opinião Pública; v. 28 n. 3 (2022): set./dez.; 678-7151807-0191reponame:Opinião Pública (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8671935/30900Brazil; ContemporaryBrasil; ContemporáneoBrasil; ContemporâneoCopyright (c) 2022 Opinião Públicahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPenna, Camila Carvalho, Priscila Delgado deZanandrez, Priscila2023-01-11T17:35:53Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8671935Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/opPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/oaicesop@unicamp.br||racael@unicamp.br || rop@unicamp.br1807-01910104-6276opendoar:2023-01-11T17:35:53Opinião Pública (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Between procedure and substance: political participation and the meanings of democracy
Entre el procedimiento y el fondo: la participación política y los sentidos de la democracia
Entre procedimento e substância: participação política e sentidos da democracia
title Between procedure and substance: political participation and the meanings of democracy
spellingShingle Between procedure and substance: political participation and the meanings of democracy
Penna, Camila
Participation
Democracy
Political culture
Participacíon
Democracia
Cultura politica
Participação
Democracia
Cultura política
title_short Between procedure and substance: political participation and the meanings of democracy
title_full Between procedure and substance: political participation and the meanings of democracy
title_fullStr Between procedure and substance: political participation and the meanings of democracy
title_full_unstemmed Between procedure and substance: political participation and the meanings of democracy
title_sort Between procedure and substance: political participation and the meanings of democracy
author Penna, Camila
author_facet Penna, Camila
Carvalho, Priscila Delgado de
Zanandrez, Priscila
author_role author
author2 Carvalho, Priscila Delgado de
Zanandrez, Priscila
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Penna, Camila
Carvalho, Priscila Delgado de
Zanandrez, Priscila
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Participation
Democracy
Political culture
Participacíon
Democracia
Cultura politica
Participação
Democracia
Cultura política
topic Participation
Democracy
Political culture
Participacíon
Democracia
Cultura politica
Participação
Democracia
Cultura política
description Among the literature on political culture and participatory experiences, participation has commonly been related to democratic values and the deepening of democracy. However, there is still an explanatory gap regarding how activists from different sectors of civil society think about and conceive democracy. Anchored in the question, “How do people with different trajectories of activism understand democracy?”, this article aims to provide a theoretical and empirical explanation of how citizens with different participatory experiences understand democracy and, alternatively, how they conceive non-democratic regimes. Based on analysis of the conversations produced by focus groups held in Belo Horizonte, Porto Alegre, and Montes Claros, from March to September 2019, the article will demonstrate how understandings about democracy vary depending on the profile and the links of the participants.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-01-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Texto
Texto
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8671935
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8671935
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8671935/30900
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Opinião Pública
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Opinião Pública
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
Brasil; Contemporáneo
Brasil; Contemporâneo
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Opinião Pública; Vol. 28 No. 3 (2022): set./dez.; 678-715
Opinião Pública; Vol. 28 Núm. 3 (2022): set./dez.; 678-715
Opinião Pública; v. 28 n. 3 (2022): set./dez.; 678-715
1807-0191
reponame:Opinião Pública (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Opinião Pública (Online)
collection Opinião Pública (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Opinião Pública (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cesop@unicamp.br||racael@unicamp.br || rop@unicamp.br
_version_ 1800217018488586240

Registros relacionados