Combating corruption as a citizen priority for government action: the case of Chile, 2000-2019
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | spa |
Título da fonte: | Opinião Pública (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8666894 |
Resumo: | After a theoretical discussion on the determinants of perception of corruption and on the importance people give to fighting corruption as a priority for government action, we postulate 4 hypotheses and we test them for the case of Chile, a democracy with low levels perception of corruption, but with several corruption scandals in recent years. We use 43 (N=63768) national polls conducted by the Center for Public Studies (CEP) between 2000 and 2019 to estimate binary logistic models. The likelihood of mentioning corruption instead of other issues as a priority for government action is lower among people who approve of the president’s performance, higher in those who use more media to get their political information, lower in the first year and higher in the last year of every administration, and lower among those who think crime, employment and other social issues should be a priority for government action. |
id |
UNICAMP-10_188d6efd05501f9b586b0306d041db9a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8666894 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-10 |
network_name_str |
Opinião Pública (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Combating corruption as a citizen priority for government action: the case of Chile, 2000-2019El combate a la corrupción como prioridad ciudadana para la acción gubernamenta : el caso de Chile, 2000-2019O combate à corrupção como prioridade cidadã para a ação governamental : o caso do Chile, 2000- 2019CorrupciónOpinión públicaConfianza institucionalAprobación presidencialChileCorrupçãoOpinião públicaConfiança institucionalAprovação presidencialChileCorruptionPublic opinionTrust in institutionsPresidential approvalChileAfter a theoretical discussion on the determinants of perception of corruption and on the importance people give to fighting corruption as a priority for government action, we postulate 4 hypotheses and we test them for the case of Chile, a democracy with low levels perception of corruption, but with several corruption scandals in recent years. We use 43 (N=63768) national polls conducted by the Center for Public Studies (CEP) between 2000 and 2019 to estimate binary logistic models. The likelihood of mentioning corruption instead of other issues as a priority for government action is lower among people who approve of the president’s performance, higher in those who use more media to get their political information, lower in the first year and higher in the last year of every administration, and lower among those who think crime, employment and other social issues should be a priority for government action.Después de una discusión teórica sobre qué explica la percepción de corrupción y la importancia que le da la gente a que el combate a la corrupción sea una prioridad para la acción gubernamental, planteamos 4 hipótesis que testeamos en Chile, una democracia con baja percepción de corrupción, pero con varios escándalos de corrupción en años recientes. Usamos 43 encuestas (N = 63.768) nacionales del Centro de Estudios Públicos (CEP) entre 2000 y 2019 para estimar modelos logísticos binarios. La probabilidad de mencionar a la corrupción por sobre otros asuntos como prioridad para la acción gubernamental es menor entre los que aprueban al presidente, mayor entre los que más consumen medios de comunicación para informarse políticamente, menor en los primeros años y mayor en los últimos años de cada gobierno, y menor en personas que consideran que la delincuencia, elempleo y otros temas sociales debieran ser prioridad para el gobierno.Após uma discussão teórica sobre o que explica a percepção de corrupção e a importância que as pessoas atribuem ao combate da corrupção como uma prioridade para a ação governamental, propusemos 4 hipóteses que testamos no Chile, uma democracia com baixa percepção de corrupção, mas com vários escândalos de corrupção nos últimos anos. Usamos 43 pesquisas nacionais (N = 63.768) do Centro de Estudos Públicos (CEP) entre 2000 e 2019 para estimar modelos logísticos binários. A probabilidade de citar a corrupção em detrimento de outras questões como prioridade para a ação governamental é menor entre os que aprovam o presidente, maior entre aqueles que mais consomem mídia para informação política, menor nos primeiros anos e maior nos últimos anos de cada governo, e menor entre as pessoas que consideram que o crime, o emprego e outras questões sociais devem ser uma prioridade para o governo.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2021-09-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8666894Opinião Pública; Vol. 27 No. 2 (2021): maio/ago.; 451-475Opinião Pública; Vol. 27 Núm. 2 (2021): maio/ago.; 451-475Opinião Pública; v. 27 n. 2 (2021): maio/ago.; 451-4751807-0191reponame:Opinião Pública (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPspahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8666894/27254Chile; 2000-2019Chile; 2000-2019Chile; 2000-2019Copyright (c) 2021 Mariángeles Cifuentes Krstulovic, Patricio Naviahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCifuentes Krstulovic, Mariángeles Navia, Patricio 2021-09-08T20:02:03Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8666894Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/opPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/oaicesop@unicamp.br||racael@unicamp.br || rop@unicamp.br1807-01910104-6276opendoar:2021-09-08T20:02:03Opinião Pública (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Combating corruption as a citizen priority for government action: the case of Chile, 2000-2019 El combate a la corrupción como prioridad ciudadana para la acción gubernamenta : el caso de Chile, 2000-2019 O combate à corrupção como prioridade cidadã para a ação governamental : o caso do Chile, 2000- 2019 |
title |
Combating corruption as a citizen priority for government action: the case of Chile, 2000-2019 |
spellingShingle |
Combating corruption as a citizen priority for government action: the case of Chile, 2000-2019 Cifuentes Krstulovic, Mariángeles Corrupción Opinión pública Confianza institucional Aprobación presidencial Chile Corrupção Opinião pública Confiança institucional Aprovação presidencial Chile Corruption Public opinion Trust in institutions Presidential approval Chile |
title_short |
Combating corruption as a citizen priority for government action: the case of Chile, 2000-2019 |
title_full |
Combating corruption as a citizen priority for government action: the case of Chile, 2000-2019 |
title_fullStr |
Combating corruption as a citizen priority for government action: the case of Chile, 2000-2019 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Combating corruption as a citizen priority for government action: the case of Chile, 2000-2019 |
title_sort |
Combating corruption as a citizen priority for government action: the case of Chile, 2000-2019 |
author |
Cifuentes Krstulovic, Mariángeles |
author_facet |
Cifuentes Krstulovic, Mariángeles Navia, Patricio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Navia, Patricio |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cifuentes Krstulovic, Mariángeles Navia, Patricio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Corrupción Opinión pública Confianza institucional Aprobación presidencial Chile Corrupção Opinião pública Confiança institucional Aprovação presidencial Chile Corruption Public opinion Trust in institutions Presidential approval Chile |
topic |
Corrupción Opinión pública Confianza institucional Aprobación presidencial Chile Corrupção Opinião pública Confiança institucional Aprovação presidencial Chile Corruption Public opinion Trust in institutions Presidential approval Chile |
description |
After a theoretical discussion on the determinants of perception of corruption and on the importance people give to fighting corruption as a priority for government action, we postulate 4 hypotheses and we test them for the case of Chile, a democracy with low levels perception of corruption, but with several corruption scandals in recent years. We use 43 (N=63768) national polls conducted by the Center for Public Studies (CEP) between 2000 and 2019 to estimate binary logistic models. The likelihood of mentioning corruption instead of other issues as a priority for government action is lower among people who approve of the president’s performance, higher in those who use more media to get their political information, lower in the first year and higher in the last year of every administration, and lower among those who think crime, employment and other social issues should be a priority for government action. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-09-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Texto Texto info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8666894 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8666894 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8666894/27254 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Mariángeles Cifuentes Krstulovic, Patricio Navia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Mariángeles Cifuentes Krstulovic, Patricio Navia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Chile; 2000-2019 Chile; 2000-2019 Chile; 2000-2019 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Opinião Pública; Vol. 27 No. 2 (2021): maio/ago.; 451-475 Opinião Pública; Vol. 27 Núm. 2 (2021): maio/ago.; 451-475 Opinião Pública; v. 27 n. 2 (2021): maio/ago.; 451-475 1807-0191 reponame:Opinião Pública (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Opinião Pública (Online) |
collection |
Opinião Pública (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Opinião Pública (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cesop@unicamp.br||racael@unicamp.br || rop@unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800217018192887808 |