Who is best represented? Congruence between members of the parliament and segments of the brazilian electorate
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Opinião Pública (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8668739 |
Resumo: | An emerging line of research indicates that in many democracies members of the parliament under-represent certain groups. Hoping to expand this research agenda in Brazil, we analyzed whether the degree of congruence between preferences of representatives and voters varies across segments of the populace and, if so, which groups are best represented. Our expectation was that congruence would be smaller for socially disadvantaged groups, which have fewer resources for political participation and for the exercise of other forms of influence. We use the distance of preferences in voter-representative pairs (dyads), considered the most suitable measure for collective representation. Our analysis considers 11 issues in the period 2004-2014. The results confirm the expectation; notably, the representative advantage of the more educated seems to be greater than that of the more affluent. |
id |
UNICAMP-10_840574297c3b46315e5bce22df3c6dc0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8668739 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-10 |
network_name_str |
Opinião Pública (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Who is best represented? Congruence between members of the parliament and segments of the brazilian electorate¿Quién está mejor representado? Congruencia entre congresistas y segmentos del electorado brasileñoQuem é mais bem representado? Congruência entre parlamentares e segmentos do eleitorado brasileiroRepresentationPolitical inequalityCongruenceAffluence biasSchooling biasRepresentaciónDesigualdad políticaCongruenciaSesgo de participaciónSesgo de escolarizaciónRepresentaçãoDesigualdade políticaCongruênciaViés de afluênciaViés de escolaridadeAn emerging line of research indicates that in many democracies members of the parliament under-represent certain groups. Hoping to expand this research agenda in Brazil, we analyzed whether the degree of congruence between preferences of representatives and voters varies across segments of the populace and, if so, which groups are best represented. Our expectation was that congruence would be smaller for socially disadvantaged groups, which have fewer resources for political participation and for the exercise of other forms of influence. We use the distance of preferences in voter-representative pairs (dyads), considered the most suitable measure for collective representation. Our analysis considers 11 issues in the period 2004-2014. The results confirm the expectation; notably, the representative advantage of the more educated seems to be greater than that of the more affluent.Una línea de investigación emergente señala que, en muchas democracias representativas, ciertos segmentos estarían subrepresentados. Dada la producción aún incipiente sobre el tema en Brasil, analizamos si el grado de congruencia entre las preferencias de los diputados federales y representados varía entre estratos del electorado y, de ser así, qué grupos estarían mejor representados. Nuestra expectativa era que la congruencia sería menor para los segmentos socialmente desfavorecidos, los cuales tienen menos recursos para la participación política y la movilización de representantes. Utilizamos la distancia de preferencias en pares votante-representante (díadas), considerada la medida más adecuada para determinar la representación colectiva. El análisis considera 11 cuestiones en el período 2004-2014. Los resultados confirman la expectativa; notablemente, la ventaja representativa de los más educados resultó ser mayor que la de los más ricos.Uma linha emergente de investigação aponta que, em muitas democracias, os parlamentares sub-representam certos segmentos. Diante da ainda tímida produção sobre o tema no Brasil, analisamos se o grau de congruência entre preferências de deputados federais e representados varia entre estratos do eleitorado e, se sim, quais são os grupos mais bem representados. Nossa expectativa era que a congruência fosse menor para segmentos socialmente desfavorecidos, os quais dispõem de menos recursos para a participação política e mobilização de representantes. Utilizamos a distância de preferências em pares eleitor-representante (díades), reputada a medida mais adequada para apurar representação coletiva. A análise considera 11 issues no período 2004-2014. Os resultados confirmam a expectativa; notavelmente, a vantagem representativa dos mais escolarizados se revelou superior à dos mais afluentes.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2022-03-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8668739Opinião Pública; Vol. 27 No. 3 (2021): set./dez.; 878-922Opinião Pública; Vol. 27 Núm. 3 (2021): set./dez.; 878-922Opinião Pública; v. 27 n. 3 (2021): set./dez.; 878-9221807-0191reponame:Opinião Pública (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8668739/28159Brazil; ComtemporaryBrasil; ContemporáneoBrasil; ContemporâneoCopyright (c) 2021 Tábata Christie Freitas Moreira, Ana Paula Karruzhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoreira, Tábata Christie Freitas Karruz, Ana Paula 2022-03-25T13:20:12Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8668739Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/opPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/oaicesop@unicamp.br||racael@unicamp.br || rop@unicamp.br1807-01910104-6276opendoar:2022-03-25T13:20:12Opinião Pública (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Who is best represented? Congruence between members of the parliament and segments of the brazilian electorate ¿Quién está mejor representado? Congruencia entre congresistas y segmentos del electorado brasileño Quem é mais bem representado? Congruência entre parlamentares e segmentos do eleitorado brasileiro |
title |
Who is best represented? Congruence between members of the parliament and segments of the brazilian electorate |
spellingShingle |
Who is best represented? Congruence between members of the parliament and segments of the brazilian electorate Moreira, Tábata Christie Freitas Representation Political inequality Congruence Affluence bias Schooling bias Representación Desigualdad política Congruencia Sesgo de participación Sesgo de escolarización Representação Desigualdade política Congruência Viés de afluência Viés de escolaridade |
title_short |
Who is best represented? Congruence between members of the parliament and segments of the brazilian electorate |
title_full |
Who is best represented? Congruence between members of the parliament and segments of the brazilian electorate |
title_fullStr |
Who is best represented? Congruence between members of the parliament and segments of the brazilian electorate |
title_full_unstemmed |
Who is best represented? Congruence between members of the parliament and segments of the brazilian electorate |
title_sort |
Who is best represented? Congruence between members of the parliament and segments of the brazilian electorate |
author |
Moreira, Tábata Christie Freitas |
author_facet |
Moreira, Tábata Christie Freitas Karruz, Ana Paula |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Karruz, Ana Paula |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Moreira, Tábata Christie Freitas Karruz, Ana Paula |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Representation Political inequality Congruence Affluence bias Schooling bias Representación Desigualdad política Congruencia Sesgo de participación Sesgo de escolarización Representação Desigualdade política Congruência Viés de afluência Viés de escolaridade |
topic |
Representation Political inequality Congruence Affluence bias Schooling bias Representación Desigualdad política Congruencia Sesgo de participación Sesgo de escolarización Representação Desigualdade política Congruência Viés de afluência Viés de escolaridade |
description |
An emerging line of research indicates that in many democracies members of the parliament under-represent certain groups. Hoping to expand this research agenda in Brazil, we analyzed whether the degree of congruence between preferences of representatives and voters varies across segments of the populace and, if so, which groups are best represented. Our expectation was that congruence would be smaller for socially disadvantaged groups, which have fewer resources for political participation and for the exercise of other forms of influence. We use the distance of preferences in voter-representative pairs (dyads), considered the most suitable measure for collective representation. Our analysis considers 11 issues in the period 2004-2014. The results confirm the expectation; notably, the representative advantage of the more educated seems to be greater than that of the more affluent. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-03-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Texto Texto info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8668739 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8668739 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8668739/28159 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Tábata Christie Freitas Moreira, Ana Paula Karruz https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Tábata Christie Freitas Moreira, Ana Paula Karruz https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazil; Comtemporary Brasil; Contemporáneo Brasil; Contemporâneo |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Opinião Pública; Vol. 27 No. 3 (2021): set./dez.; 878-922 Opinião Pública; Vol. 27 Núm. 3 (2021): set./dez.; 878-922 Opinião Pública; v. 27 n. 3 (2021): set./dez.; 878-922 1807-0191 reponame:Opinião Pública (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Opinião Pública (Online) |
collection |
Opinião Pública (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Opinião Pública (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cesop@unicamp.br||racael@unicamp.br || rop@unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800217018414137344 |