The labor reform of 2017 and its effects: analysis of the procedural flow of TRT1

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fontainha, Fernando
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Rodrigues, Paulo, Fernandes, Pedro de Araujo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Opinião Pública (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8668735
Resumo: In 2017, the Consolidation of Labour Laws (CLT) underwent its greatest and most extensive change since 1943. Law 13,467 / 2017, known as the 2017 Labour Reform, changed about 120 articles of the CLT, substantially impacting the perception of rights, calculation of severance pay and general procedural aspects. This article is part of a broader research that sought to understand the impacts of the Labour Reform of 2017 on the procedural flow of the Regional Labour Court (TRT) of the 1st Region, from 2015 to 2019. The aim of the analysis was the investigation of the effects of the reform on the access of justice - with focus on the beneficiaries of free justice -, on the main issues of the cases, and on the values of the cause of the conviction. The reform's legislative trajectory was explained, followed by a discussion on some points of change in the text of the CLT. Through descriptive statistics techniques, we present the changes observed in the flow of processes and show that in addition to the drop in the number of cases, there is a change in the most common issues and in the values of causes and convictions.
id UNICAMP-10_8d6d4d849501ccce408c02323c9bc0f0
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8668735
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-10
network_name_str Opinião Pública (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The labor reform of 2017 and its effects: analysis of the procedural flow of TRT1La reforma laboral de 2017 y sus efectos: análisis del flujo procesal de TRT1A reforma trabalhista de 2017 e seus efeitos: análise do fluxo processual do TRT1Justiça do trabalhoReforma trabalhista de 2017Fluxo processualJusticia del trabajoReforma laboral de 2017Flujo procesualLabour justiceLabour reform of 2017Procedural flowIn 2017, the Consolidation of Labour Laws (CLT) underwent its greatest and most extensive change since 1943. Law 13,467 / 2017, known as the 2017 Labour Reform, changed about 120 articles of the CLT, substantially impacting the perception of rights, calculation of severance pay and general procedural aspects. This article is part of a broader research that sought to understand the impacts of the Labour Reform of 2017 on the procedural flow of the Regional Labour Court (TRT) of the 1st Region, from 2015 to 2019. The aim of the analysis was the investigation of the effects of the reform on the access of justice - with focus on the beneficiaries of free justice -, on the main issues of the cases, and on the values of the cause of the conviction. The reform's legislative trajectory was explained, followed by a discussion on some points of change in the text of the CLT. Through descriptive statistics techniques, we present the changes observed in the flow of processes and show that in addition to the drop in the number of cases, there is a change in the most common issues and in the values of causes and convictions.En el año de 2017, la Consolidación de Leyes Laborales (CLT) experimentó su mayor cambio desde 1943. La Ley 13.467 / 2017, conocida como la Reforma Laboral de 2017, cambió aproximadamente 120 artículos de la CLT, impactando sustancialmente la percepción de derechos, cálculo de indemnizaciones y aspectos procesales. Este artículo es parte de una investigación más amplia que buscó comprender los impactos de la Reforma Laboral de 2017 en el flujo procesal del Tribunal Regional de Trabajo (TRT) de la 1ª Región, de 2015 a 2019. El análisis consiste en la investigación de los efectos de la Reforma en el acceso a la justicia laboral, con un enfoque en el beneficio de la gratuidad de la justicia -, en los principales temas de los procesos, y en los valores de la causa y de la sentencia. Se presenta la trayectoria legislativa de la reforma, seguida de una discusión sobre algunos cambios en el texto CLT. Por medio de técnicas de estadística descriptiva, se presenta cambios observados en el flujo de proceso en el TRT de la 1a Región, lo que indica que además de la caída en el número de casos, hay un cambio en los temas más comunes y en el valor de la causa y de la sentencia.No ano de 2017, a Consolidação das Leis do Trabalho (CLT) sofreu a sua maior e mais ampla alteração desde 1943. A Lei 13.467/2017, conhecida como a Reforma Trabalhista de 2017, modificou cerca de 120 artigos da CLT, impactando substantivamente a percepção de direitos, cálculo de verbas rescisórias e aspectos processuais gerais. O presente artigo se insere numa pesquisa de escopo mais amplo que buscou entender os impactos da Reforma Trabalhista de 2017 no fluxo processual do Tribunal Regional do Trabalho (TRT) da 1ª Região, no recorte de 2015 a 2019. O objeto da análise aqui apresentada consiste na investigação dos efeitos da Reforma no acesso à Justiça do Trabalho – com enfoque no benefício de gratuidade de justiça –, nos assuntos principais dos processos e nos valores da causa e da condenação. Foi explicitada a trajetória legislativa da Reforma, seguida de uma discussão sobre alguns pontos de alteração no texto da CLT. Por meio de técnicas de estatística descritiva, apresentamos as mudanças observadas no fluxo dos processos no TRT da 1ª Região, indicando que, além da queda no número de processos, há uma alteração nos assuntos mais comuns e nos valores das causas e condenações.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2022-03-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8668735Opinião Pública; Vol. 27 No. 3 (2021): set./dez.; 797-821Opinião Pública; Vol. 27 Núm. 3 (2021): set./dez.; 797-821Opinião Pública; v. 27 n. 3 (2021): set./dez.; 797-8211807-0191reponame:Opinião Pública (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8668735/28155Brazil; 2017Brasil; 2017Brasil; 2017Copyright (c) 2021 Fernando Fontainha, Paulo Rodrigues, Pedro de Araujo Fernandeshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFontainha, Fernando Rodrigues, Paulo Fernandes, Pedro de Araujo 2022-03-25T13:20:12Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8668735Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/opPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/oaicesop@unicamp.br||racael@unicamp.br || rop@unicamp.br1807-01910104-6276opendoar:2022-03-25T13:20:12Opinião Pública (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The labor reform of 2017 and its effects: analysis of the procedural flow of TRT1
La reforma laboral de 2017 y sus efectos: análisis del flujo procesal de TRT1
A reforma trabalhista de 2017 e seus efeitos: análise do fluxo processual do TRT1
title The labor reform of 2017 and its effects: analysis of the procedural flow of TRT1
spellingShingle The labor reform of 2017 and its effects: analysis of the procedural flow of TRT1
Fontainha, Fernando
Justiça do trabalho
Reforma trabalhista de 2017
Fluxo processual
Justicia del trabajo
Reforma laboral de 2017
Flujo procesual
Labour justice
Labour reform of 2017
Procedural flow
title_short The labor reform of 2017 and its effects: analysis of the procedural flow of TRT1
title_full The labor reform of 2017 and its effects: analysis of the procedural flow of TRT1
title_fullStr The labor reform of 2017 and its effects: analysis of the procedural flow of TRT1
title_full_unstemmed The labor reform of 2017 and its effects: analysis of the procedural flow of TRT1
title_sort The labor reform of 2017 and its effects: analysis of the procedural flow of TRT1
author Fontainha, Fernando
author_facet Fontainha, Fernando
Rodrigues, Paulo
Fernandes, Pedro de Araujo
author_role author
author2 Rodrigues, Paulo
Fernandes, Pedro de Araujo
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fontainha, Fernando
Rodrigues, Paulo
Fernandes, Pedro de Araujo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Justiça do trabalho
Reforma trabalhista de 2017
Fluxo processual
Justicia del trabajo
Reforma laboral de 2017
Flujo procesual
Labour justice
Labour reform of 2017
Procedural flow
topic Justiça do trabalho
Reforma trabalhista de 2017
Fluxo processual
Justicia del trabajo
Reforma laboral de 2017
Flujo procesual
Labour justice
Labour reform of 2017
Procedural flow
description In 2017, the Consolidation of Labour Laws (CLT) underwent its greatest and most extensive change since 1943. Law 13,467 / 2017, known as the 2017 Labour Reform, changed about 120 articles of the CLT, substantially impacting the perception of rights, calculation of severance pay and general procedural aspects. This article is part of a broader research that sought to understand the impacts of the Labour Reform of 2017 on the procedural flow of the Regional Labour Court (TRT) of the 1st Region, from 2015 to 2019. The aim of the analysis was the investigation of the effects of the reform on the access of justice - with focus on the beneficiaries of free justice -, on the main issues of the cases, and on the values of the cause of the conviction. The reform's legislative trajectory was explained, followed by a discussion on some points of change in the text of the CLT. Through descriptive statistics techniques, we present the changes observed in the flow of processes and show that in addition to the drop in the number of cases, there is a change in the most common issues and in the values of causes and convictions.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-03-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Texto
Texto
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8668735
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8668735
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8668735/28155
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Fernando Fontainha, Paulo Rodrigues, Pedro de Araujo Fernandes
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Fernando Fontainha, Paulo Rodrigues, Pedro de Araujo Fernandes
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; 2017
Brasil; 2017
Brasil; 2017
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Opinião Pública; Vol. 27 No. 3 (2021): set./dez.; 797-821
Opinião Pública; Vol. 27 Núm. 3 (2021): set./dez.; 797-821
Opinião Pública; v. 27 n. 3 (2021): set./dez.; 797-821
1807-0191
reponame:Opinião Pública (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Opinião Pública (Online)
collection Opinião Pública (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Opinião Pública (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cesop@unicamp.br||racael@unicamp.br || rop@unicamp.br
_version_ 1800217018405748736