Lasting neoliberalism: the Washington Consensus in the Latin American Pink Tide
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Opinião Pública (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8659541 |
Resumo: | This research aims to investigate the continuity of neoliberalism in the Latin America electoral politics during the Pink Tide, showing its presence in the presidential platforms launched from 1999 to 2015. A content analysis, based on the Washington Consensus, which is a kind of neoliberal manifesto, is used as an approach in this research. The analysis used 94 platforms from 47 presidential elections that took place in 13 Latin American countries. The research reveals that neoliberalism in fact has lost ground and the Washington Consensus rules, such as privatization and reduction in public spending, have been emphatically rejected. Meanwhile the ground established by rules such as inflation control and public deficit reduction presents the neoliberal resilience during the Pink Tide, even in non-neoliberal presidential platforms. As far as it measures the presence of the Washington Consensus in Latin America political scene after 2000, this study helps to ponder on the anti-neoliberal agenda limits and the basis of the resumption of the ideology in the subcontinent. |
id |
UNICAMP-10_eb4b284e18498e35cf3fbbd1d55e6b41 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8659541 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-10 |
network_name_str |
Opinião Pública (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Lasting neoliberalism: the Washington Consensus in the Latin American Pink TideNeoliberalismo perdurable: el Consenso de Washington en la Marea Rosa LatinoamericanaNeoliberalismo durável: o Consenso de Washington na Onda Rosa Latino-AmericanaIdeologyPresidential electionsElectoral platformsPolitical partiesIdeologíaElecciones presidencialesProgramas de gobiernoPartidos políticosIdeologiaEleições presidenciaisProgramas de governoPartidos políticosThis research aims to investigate the continuity of neoliberalism in the Latin America electoral politics during the Pink Tide, showing its presence in the presidential platforms launched from 1999 to 2015. A content analysis, based on the Washington Consensus, which is a kind of neoliberal manifesto, is used as an approach in this research. The analysis used 94 platforms from 47 presidential elections that took place in 13 Latin American countries. The research reveals that neoliberalism in fact has lost ground and the Washington Consensus rules, such as privatization and reduction in public spending, have been emphatically rejected. Meanwhile the ground established by rules such as inflation control and public deficit reduction presents the neoliberal resilience during the Pink Tide, even in non-neoliberal presidential platforms. As far as it measures the presence of the Washington Consensus in Latin America political scene after 2000, this study helps to ponder on the anti-neoliberal agenda limits and the basis of the resumption of the ideology in the subcontinent.Esta investigación tiene como objetivo averiguar la continuidad del neoliberalismo en la política electoral de América Latina durante la Marea Rosa, mostrando su presencia en las plataformas presidenciales lanzadas desde 1999 hasta 2015. Se utiliza en esta investigación un análisis de contenido, como un enfoque basado en el Consenso de Washington, que es una especie de manifiesto neoliberal. El análisis utilizó 94 plataformas de 47 elecciones presidenciales que se llevaron a cabo en 13 países latinoamericanos. La investigación revela que, de hecho, el neoliberalismo ha perdido terreno. Algunas reglas del Consenso de Washington, como la privatización y la reducción del gasto público, han sido rechazadas enfáticamente. Mientras tanto, el terreno establecido por reglas como el control de la inflación y la reducción del déficit público presenta la resistencia neoliberal durante la Marea Rosa, incluso en plataformas presidenciales no neoliberales. En la medida en que evalúa la presencia del Consenso de Washington en escenario político en América Latina después del 2000, este estudio ayuda a reflexionar sobre los límites de la agenda anti neoliberal y las bases de la reanudación de la ideología en el subcontinente.Este artigo investiga a permanência do neoliberalismo na política eleitoral latino-americana durante a Onda Rosa, mostrando sua presença nas plataformas presidenciais lançadas entre 1999 e 2015. Com esse objetivo, desenvolve uma estratégia de análise de conteúdo baseada nas regras do Consenso de Washington, espécie de manifesto programático do neoliberalismo. Foram analisados 94 programas de governo, de 47 eleições presidenciais ocorridas em 13 países da América Latina. A pesquisa revela que o neoliberalismo realmente perdeu espaço e que algumas regras do Consenso de Washington, como a privatização e a redução do gasto público, foram enfaticamente rejeitadas. Já o espaço ocupado por regras como o controle da inflação e a redução do déficit público mostra a resiliência neoliberal durante a Onda Rosa, mesmo em parte dos programas de governo dos presidentes não neoliberais. Na medida em que dimensiona a presença do Consenso de Washington na cena política da América Latina dos anos 2000, esta investigação ajuda a refletir sobre os limites da agenda contrária ao neoliberalismo e as bases da retomada dessa ideologia no subcontinente.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2020-05-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8659541Opinião Pública; Vol. 26 No. 1 (2020): jan./abr.; 159-192Opinião Pública; Vol. 26 Núm. 1 (2020): jan./abr.; 159-192Opinião Pública; v. 26 n. 1 (2020): jan./abr.; 159-1921807-0191reponame:Opinião Pública (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8659541/22374Brazil; ContemporanyBrasil; ContemporâneoBrasil; ContemporâneoCopyright (c) 2020 Opinião Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Augusto Neftali Corte de 2020-05-09T19:54:41Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8659541Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/opPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/oaicesop@unicamp.br||racael@unicamp.br || rop@unicamp.br1807-01910104-6276opendoar:2020-05-09T19:54:41Opinião Pública (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Lasting neoliberalism: the Washington Consensus in the Latin American Pink Tide Neoliberalismo perdurable: el Consenso de Washington en la Marea Rosa Latinoamericana Neoliberalismo durável: o Consenso de Washington na Onda Rosa Latino-Americana |
title |
Lasting neoliberalism: the Washington Consensus in the Latin American Pink Tide |
spellingShingle |
Lasting neoliberalism: the Washington Consensus in the Latin American Pink Tide Oliveira, Augusto Neftali Corte de Ideology Presidential elections Electoral platforms Political parties Ideología Elecciones presidenciales Programas de gobierno Partidos políticos Ideologia Eleições presidenciais Programas de governo Partidos políticos |
title_short |
Lasting neoliberalism: the Washington Consensus in the Latin American Pink Tide |
title_full |
Lasting neoliberalism: the Washington Consensus in the Latin American Pink Tide |
title_fullStr |
Lasting neoliberalism: the Washington Consensus in the Latin American Pink Tide |
title_full_unstemmed |
Lasting neoliberalism: the Washington Consensus in the Latin American Pink Tide |
title_sort |
Lasting neoliberalism: the Washington Consensus in the Latin American Pink Tide |
author |
Oliveira, Augusto Neftali Corte de |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Augusto Neftali Corte de |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Augusto Neftali Corte de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ideology Presidential elections Electoral platforms Political parties Ideología Elecciones presidenciales Programas de gobierno Partidos políticos Ideologia Eleições presidenciais Programas de governo Partidos políticos |
topic |
Ideology Presidential elections Electoral platforms Political parties Ideología Elecciones presidenciales Programas de gobierno Partidos políticos Ideologia Eleições presidenciais Programas de governo Partidos políticos |
description |
This research aims to investigate the continuity of neoliberalism in the Latin America electoral politics during the Pink Tide, showing its presence in the presidential platforms launched from 1999 to 2015. A content analysis, based on the Washington Consensus, which is a kind of neoliberal manifesto, is used as an approach in this research. The analysis used 94 platforms from 47 presidential elections that took place in 13 Latin American countries. The research reveals that neoliberalism in fact has lost ground and the Washington Consensus rules, such as privatization and reduction in public spending, have been emphatically rejected. Meanwhile the ground established by rules such as inflation control and public deficit reduction presents the neoliberal resilience during the Pink Tide, even in non-neoliberal presidential platforms. As far as it measures the presence of the Washington Consensus in Latin America political scene after 2000, this study helps to ponder on the anti-neoliberal agenda limits and the basis of the resumption of the ideology in the subcontinent. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-05 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Texto Texto info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8659541 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8659541 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8659541/22374 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Opinião Pública info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Opinião Pública |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazil; Contemporany Brasil; Contemporâneo Brasil; Contemporâneo |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Opinião Pública; Vol. 26 No. 1 (2020): jan./abr.; 159-192 Opinião Pública; Vol. 26 Núm. 1 (2020): jan./abr.; 159-192 Opinião Pública; v. 26 n. 1 (2020): jan./abr.; 159-192 1807-0191 reponame:Opinião Pública (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Opinião Pública (Online) |
collection |
Opinião Pública (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Opinião Pública (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cesop@unicamp.br||racael@unicamp.br || rop@unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800217018105856000 |