(In)alienability in compound nouns in Apurinã (Arawak)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/cel/article/view/8661313 |
Resumo: | The status of compound nouns in Apurinã is discussed regarding the possibility of occurring in constructions of (in)alienable possession, based on data collected using contextual stimuli not previously used in Apurinã data collection. The use of contextual stimuli in data collection led to a revision and expansion of the analysis of the (in)alienability marking patterns in compound nouns in Apurinã. Facundes (2000) argued that the morphological marking patterns of (in)alienable nouns do not apply to compounds. Freitas (2017) starts from the definitions of Haspelmath (2008) and Stassen (2009) and analyzes (in)alienability in Apurinã based both on the morphological marking of nouns, and on their frequency of occurrence in texts; inalienable nouns have possession as part of their meanings, occur most often possessed in texts and are unmarked in possession constructions; among the inalienable nouns, there are i) inalienable nouns that can have their mandatory possession "suspended" by adding the suffix -txi, as in ny-tikaku (1SG-belly.of) 'my belly' / tikaku-txi (belly.of- N.POSSD) 'belly', and ii) inalienable nouns that do not occur with -txi, as they require a possessor, as in n-yry (1sg-pai.de) 'my father', instead of *yry-txi (someone’s father). Alienable nouns, on the other hand, occur most frequently not possessed in texts, being marked in possession constructions by the suffixes -te, -ne, -re1 and -re2, lexically conditioned, such as ny-xamynaky-te (1SG-shotgun-POSSD) / xamynaky 'shotgun'. The results of the analysis allowed us to conclude that, while the (in)alienability marking patterns also apply to productive compound nouns, they also indicate that the productive compound nouns marked as (in)alienable are used in more specific contexts, and less frequently in everyday life, or are neologisms, and that, therefore, they do not behave pragmatically like prototypical (in)alienable nouns in Apurinã. |
id |
UNICAMP-13_343b9890ee5b7ecb1963207ae58f565d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8661313 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-13 |
network_name_str |
Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
(In)alienability in compound nouns in Apurinã (Arawak)(In)alienabilidade em nomes compostos em Apurinã (Aruák)(In)alienabilityCompound nounsApurinã(In)alienabilidadeNomes compostosApurinãThe status of compound nouns in Apurinã is discussed regarding the possibility of occurring in constructions of (in)alienable possession, based on data collected using contextual stimuli not previously used in Apurinã data collection. The use of contextual stimuli in data collection led to a revision and expansion of the analysis of the (in)alienability marking patterns in compound nouns in Apurinã. Facundes (2000) argued that the morphological marking patterns of (in)alienable nouns do not apply to compounds. Freitas (2017) starts from the definitions of Haspelmath (2008) and Stassen (2009) and analyzes (in)alienability in Apurinã based both on the morphological marking of nouns, and on their frequency of occurrence in texts; inalienable nouns have possession as part of their meanings, occur most often possessed in texts and are unmarked in possession constructions; among the inalienable nouns, there are i) inalienable nouns that can have their mandatory possession "suspended" by adding the suffix -txi, as in ny-tikaku (1SG-belly.of) 'my belly' / tikaku-txi (belly.of- N.POSSD) 'belly', and ii) inalienable nouns that do not occur with -txi, as they require a possessor, as in n-yry (1sg-pai.de) 'my father', instead of *yry-txi (someone’s father). Alienable nouns, on the other hand, occur most frequently not possessed in texts, being marked in possession constructions by the suffixes -te, -ne, -re1 and -re2, lexically conditioned, such as ny-xamynaky-te (1SG-shotgun-POSSD) / xamynaky 'shotgun'. The results of the analysis allowed us to conclude that, while the (in)alienability marking patterns also apply to productive compound nouns, they also indicate that the productive compound nouns marked as (in)alienable are used in more specific contexts, and less frequently in everyday life, or are neologisms, and that, therefore, they do not behave pragmatically like prototypical (in)alienable nouns in Apurinã.Discute-se o status dos nomes compostos em Apurinã, quanto à possibilidade de ocorrerem em construções de posse (in)alienável, a partir de dados coletados usando estímulos contextuais até então não utilizados. Os dados coletados por meio do uso desses estímulos contextuais revelaram que se fazem necessárias revisões e ampliações na análise dos padrões de marcação de (in)alienabilidade em nomes compostos em Apurinã anteriormente proposta por Facundes (2000), segundo o qual esses padrões não se aplicariam aos compostos. Freitas (2017) parte das definições de Haspelmath (2008) e Stassen (2009) e define (in)alienabilidade em Apurinã tanto com base na marcação morfológica dos nomes, quanto na sua frequência de ocorrência em textos; nomes inalienáveis têm a posse como parte constitutiva de seus significados, ocorrem mais frequentemente possuídos em textos e são não marcados em construções de posse; dentre os inalienáveis, há i) inalienáveis que podem ter sua posse obrigatória “suspensa” pelo acréscimo do sufixo -txi, a exemplo de ny-tikaku (1SG-barriga.de) ‘minha barriga’/ tikaku-txi (barriga.de-N.POSSD) ‘barriga (não se sabe de quem)’; e ii) inalienáveis que não ocorrem com -txi, por exigirem um possuidor, a exemplo de n-yry (1SG-pai.de) ‘meu pai’, mas não *yry-txi (pai, não se sabe de quem)’. Já os nomes alienáveis ocorrem mais frequentemente não possuídos em textos, sendo marcados em construções de posse pelos sufixos -te, -ne, -re1 e -re2, lexicalmente condicionados, a exemplo de ny-xamynaky-te (1SG-espingarda-POSSD)/ xamynaky ‘espingarda’. Os resultados da análise permitiram concluir que, ao mesmo tempo em que os padrões de marcação de (in)alienabilidade aplicam-se aos nomes compostos produtivos, eles também indicam que os nomes compostos produtivos marcados como (in)alienáveis são usados em contextos mais específicos e menos frequentes no cotidiano, ou em neologismos, e que, portanto, eles não se comportam pragmaticamente como os nomes (in)alienáveis mais prototípicos em Apurinã.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2021-01-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/cel/article/view/866131310.20396/cel.v62i0.8661313Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos; v. 62 (2020): Semântica, Pragmática e Sintaxe Formais; e020019Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos; Vol. 62 (2020): Semantic, Pragmatic and Formal Syntax; e020019Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos; Vol. 62 (2020): Semántica, Pragmática y Sintaxis Formal; e0200192447-0686reponame:Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticosinstname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/cel/article/view/8661313/25807Amazonas; 2020Amazonas; 2020Copyright (c) 2020 Cadernos de Estudos Lingüísticoshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFreitas, Marília Fernanda Pereira deFacundes, Sidney da Silva2023-07-04T17:35:14Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8661313Revistahttp://revistas.iel.unicamp.br/index.php/cel/PUBhttp://revistas.iel.unicamp.br/index.php/cel/oaispublic@iel.unicamp.br||revistacel@iel.unicamp.br2447-06860102-5767opendoar:2023-07-04T17:35:14Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
(In)alienability in compound nouns in Apurinã (Arawak) (In)alienabilidade em nomes compostos em Apurinã (Aruák) |
title |
(In)alienability in compound nouns in Apurinã (Arawak) |
spellingShingle |
(In)alienability in compound nouns in Apurinã (Arawak) Freitas, Marília Fernanda Pereira de (In)alienability Compound nouns Apurinã (In)alienabilidade Nomes compostos Apurinã |
title_short |
(In)alienability in compound nouns in Apurinã (Arawak) |
title_full |
(In)alienability in compound nouns in Apurinã (Arawak) |
title_fullStr |
(In)alienability in compound nouns in Apurinã (Arawak) |
title_full_unstemmed |
(In)alienability in compound nouns in Apurinã (Arawak) |
title_sort |
(In)alienability in compound nouns in Apurinã (Arawak) |
author |
Freitas, Marília Fernanda Pereira de |
author_facet |
Freitas, Marília Fernanda Pereira de Facundes, Sidney da Silva |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Facundes, Sidney da Silva |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Freitas, Marília Fernanda Pereira de Facundes, Sidney da Silva |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
(In)alienability Compound nouns Apurinã (In)alienabilidade Nomes compostos Apurinã |
topic |
(In)alienability Compound nouns Apurinã (In)alienabilidade Nomes compostos Apurinã |
description |
The status of compound nouns in Apurinã is discussed regarding the possibility of occurring in constructions of (in)alienable possession, based on data collected using contextual stimuli not previously used in Apurinã data collection. The use of contextual stimuli in data collection led to a revision and expansion of the analysis of the (in)alienability marking patterns in compound nouns in Apurinã. Facundes (2000) argued that the morphological marking patterns of (in)alienable nouns do not apply to compounds. Freitas (2017) starts from the definitions of Haspelmath (2008) and Stassen (2009) and analyzes (in)alienability in Apurinã based both on the morphological marking of nouns, and on their frequency of occurrence in texts; inalienable nouns have possession as part of their meanings, occur most often possessed in texts and are unmarked in possession constructions; among the inalienable nouns, there are i) inalienable nouns that can have their mandatory possession "suspended" by adding the suffix -txi, as in ny-tikaku (1SG-belly.of) 'my belly' / tikaku-txi (belly.of- N.POSSD) 'belly', and ii) inalienable nouns that do not occur with -txi, as they require a possessor, as in n-yry (1sg-pai.de) 'my father', instead of *yry-txi (someone’s father). Alienable nouns, on the other hand, occur most frequently not possessed in texts, being marked in possession constructions by the suffixes -te, -ne, -re1 and -re2, lexically conditioned, such as ny-xamynaky-te (1SG-shotgun-POSSD) / xamynaky 'shotgun'. The results of the analysis allowed us to conclude that, while the (in)alienability marking patterns also apply to productive compound nouns, they also indicate that the productive compound nouns marked as (in)alienable are used in more specific contexts, and less frequently in everyday life, or are neologisms, and that, therefore, they do not behave pragmatically like prototypical (in)alienable nouns in Apurinã. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-06 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Texto info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/cel/article/view/8661313 10.20396/cel.v62i0.8661313 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/cel/article/view/8661313 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.20396/cel.v62i0.8661313 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/cel/article/view/8661313/25807 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Cadernos de Estudos Lingüísticos https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Cadernos de Estudos Lingüísticos https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Amazonas; 2020 Amazonas; 2020 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos; v. 62 (2020): Semântica, Pragmática e Sintaxe Formais; e020019 Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos; Vol. 62 (2020): Semantic, Pragmatic and Formal Syntax; e020019 Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos; Vol. 62 (2020): Semántica, Pragmática y Sintaxis Formal; e020019 2447-0686 reponame:Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos |
collection |
Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
spublic@iel.unicamp.br||revistacel@iel.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800216491993333760 |