Omniscience and Semantic Information

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Alonso, Bernardo
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Manuscrito (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8651129
Resumo: First, I consider a few motivations to idealize epistemic logics1 in such a degree that brings up the problem of logical omniscience [LOP]. I argue that the main motivation to hold omniscience is of a philosophical-scientific2 background (Stalnaker 1991), in the sense philosophers have a not so peculiar way of investigating underlying mechanisms, i.e., the interaction of several different components of complex systems may be better understood in isolation, even if such components are not found isolated in a realistic context. It is defended that the implicit and explicit knowledge distinction (Fagin and Halpern 1988) is compatible that view since idealizations made by modal epistemic logic are so strong that the agents they describe hardly have anything in common with real agents. I conclude by showing how LOP can be accommodated in the logic of being informed (Floridi 2006) using the Inverse Relationship Principle (Barwise and Seligman 1997).
id UNICAMP-17_2bbdc1eeccb0231ad7c39b2d4b30263e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8651129
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-17
network_name_str Manuscrito (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Omniscience and Semantic InformationLogical Omniscience Problem. Knowledge. Semantic Informatio.First, I consider a few motivations to idealize epistemic logics1 in such a degree that brings up the problem of logical omniscience [LOP]. I argue that the main motivation to hold omniscience is of a philosophical-scientific2 background (Stalnaker 1991), in the sense philosophers have a not so peculiar way of investigating underlying mechanisms, i.e., the interaction of several different components of complex systems may be better understood in isolation, even if such components are not found isolated in a realistic context. It is defended that the implicit and explicit knowledge distinction (Fagin and Halpern 1988) is compatible that view since idealizations made by modal epistemic logic are so strong that the agents they describe hardly have anything in common with real agents. I conclude by showing how LOP can be accommodated in the logic of being informed (Floridi 2006) using the Inverse Relationship Principle (Barwise and Seligman 1997).Universidade Estadual de Campinas2017-12-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa bibliográficaapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8651129Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 40 n. 4 (2017): out./dez.; 77-96Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 40 No. 4 (2017): out./dez.; 77-96Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 40 Núm. 4 (2017): out./dez.; 77-962317-630Xreponame:Manuscrito (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8651129/17220Copyright (c) 2017 Manuscritoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlonso, Bernardo2017-12-05T09:53:52Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8651129Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscritoPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/oaimwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br2317-630X0100-6045opendoar:2017-12-05T09:53:52Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Omniscience and Semantic Information
title Omniscience and Semantic Information
spellingShingle Omniscience and Semantic Information
Alonso, Bernardo
Logical Omniscience Problem. Knowledge. Semantic Informatio.
title_short Omniscience and Semantic Information
title_full Omniscience and Semantic Information
title_fullStr Omniscience and Semantic Information
title_full_unstemmed Omniscience and Semantic Information
title_sort Omniscience and Semantic Information
author Alonso, Bernardo
author_facet Alonso, Bernardo
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Alonso, Bernardo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Logical Omniscience Problem. Knowledge. Semantic Informatio.
topic Logical Omniscience Problem. Knowledge. Semantic Informatio.
description First, I consider a few motivations to idealize epistemic logics1 in such a degree that brings up the problem of logical omniscience [LOP]. I argue that the main motivation to hold omniscience is of a philosophical-scientific2 background (Stalnaker 1991), in the sense philosophers have a not so peculiar way of investigating underlying mechanisms, i.e., the interaction of several different components of complex systems may be better understood in isolation, even if such components are not found isolated in a realistic context. It is defended that the implicit and explicit knowledge distinction (Fagin and Halpern 1988) is compatible that view since idealizations made by modal epistemic logic are so strong that the agents they describe hardly have anything in common with real agents. I conclude by showing how LOP can be accommodated in the logic of being informed (Floridi 2006) using the Inverse Relationship Principle (Barwise and Seligman 1997).
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-05
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Pesquisa bibliográfica
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8651129
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8651129
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8651129/17220
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Manuscrito
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Manuscrito
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 40 n. 4 (2017): out./dez.; 77-96
Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 40 No. 4 (2017): out./dez.; 77-96
Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 40 Núm. 4 (2017): out./dez.; 77-96
2317-630X
reponame:Manuscrito (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Manuscrito (Online)
collection Manuscrito (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br
_version_ 1800216567014752256