Omniscience and Semantic Information
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Manuscrito (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8651129 |
Resumo: | First, I consider a few motivations to idealize epistemic logics1 in such a degree that brings up the problem of logical omniscience [LOP]. I argue that the main motivation to hold omniscience is of a philosophical-scientific2 background (Stalnaker 1991), in the sense philosophers have a not so peculiar way of investigating underlying mechanisms, i.e., the interaction of several different components of complex systems may be better understood in isolation, even if such components are not found isolated in a realistic context. It is defended that the implicit and explicit knowledge distinction (Fagin and Halpern 1988) is compatible that view since idealizations made by modal epistemic logic are so strong that the agents they describe hardly have anything in common with real agents. I conclude by showing how LOP can be accommodated in the logic of being informed (Floridi 2006) using the Inverse Relationship Principle (Barwise and Seligman 1997). |
id |
UNICAMP-17_2bbdc1eeccb0231ad7c39b2d4b30263e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8651129 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-17 |
network_name_str |
Manuscrito (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Omniscience and Semantic InformationLogical Omniscience Problem. Knowledge. Semantic Informatio.First, I consider a few motivations to idealize epistemic logics1 in such a degree that brings up the problem of logical omniscience [LOP]. I argue that the main motivation to hold omniscience is of a philosophical-scientific2 background (Stalnaker 1991), in the sense philosophers have a not so peculiar way of investigating underlying mechanisms, i.e., the interaction of several different components of complex systems may be better understood in isolation, even if such components are not found isolated in a realistic context. It is defended that the implicit and explicit knowledge distinction (Fagin and Halpern 1988) is compatible that view since idealizations made by modal epistemic logic are so strong that the agents they describe hardly have anything in common with real agents. I conclude by showing how LOP can be accommodated in the logic of being informed (Floridi 2006) using the Inverse Relationship Principle (Barwise and Seligman 1997).Universidade Estadual de Campinas2017-12-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa bibliográficaapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8651129Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 40 n. 4 (2017): out./dez.; 77-96Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 40 No. 4 (2017): out./dez.; 77-96Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 40 Núm. 4 (2017): out./dez.; 77-962317-630Xreponame:Manuscrito (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8651129/17220Copyright (c) 2017 Manuscritoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlonso, Bernardo2017-12-05T09:53:52Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8651129Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscritoPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/oaimwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br2317-630X0100-6045opendoar:2017-12-05T09:53:52Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Omniscience and Semantic Information |
title |
Omniscience and Semantic Information |
spellingShingle |
Omniscience and Semantic Information Alonso, Bernardo Logical Omniscience Problem. Knowledge. Semantic Informatio. |
title_short |
Omniscience and Semantic Information |
title_full |
Omniscience and Semantic Information |
title_fullStr |
Omniscience and Semantic Information |
title_full_unstemmed |
Omniscience and Semantic Information |
title_sort |
Omniscience and Semantic Information |
author |
Alonso, Bernardo |
author_facet |
Alonso, Bernardo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Alonso, Bernardo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Logical Omniscience Problem. Knowledge. Semantic Informatio. |
topic |
Logical Omniscience Problem. Knowledge. Semantic Informatio. |
description |
First, I consider a few motivations to idealize epistemic logics1 in such a degree that brings up the problem of logical omniscience [LOP]. I argue that the main motivation to hold omniscience is of a philosophical-scientific2 background (Stalnaker 1991), in the sense philosophers have a not so peculiar way of investigating underlying mechanisms, i.e., the interaction of several different components of complex systems may be better understood in isolation, even if such components are not found isolated in a realistic context. It is defended that the implicit and explicit knowledge distinction (Fagin and Halpern 1988) is compatible that view since idealizations made by modal epistemic logic are so strong that the agents they describe hardly have anything in common with real agents. I conclude by showing how LOP can be accommodated in the logic of being informed (Floridi 2006) using the Inverse Relationship Principle (Barwise and Seligman 1997). |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-12-05 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Pesquisa bibliográfica |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8651129 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8651129 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8651129/17220 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Manuscrito info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Manuscrito |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 40 n. 4 (2017): out./dez.; 77-96 Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 40 No. 4 (2017): out./dez.; 77-96 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 40 Núm. 4 (2017): out./dez.; 77-96 2317-630X reponame:Manuscrito (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Manuscrito (Online) |
collection |
Manuscrito (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800216567014752256 |