THE MYTH OF THE MYTH OF THE GIVEN
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Manuscrito (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644035 |
Resumo: | Qualia have historically been thought to stand in a very different epistemological relation to the knower than does the external furniture of the world. The ‘raw feels’ of thought were often said to be ‘given’, while what we might call the content of that thought – for example, claims about the external world – was thought only more or less doubtfully true; and this was often said to be because we are ‘directly’ or ‘non-inferentially’ confronted by qualia or experiences, whereas all other properties or objects are only mediately ‘connected’ to the perceiver. The modern turn in philosophy – spearheaded by Wittgenstein, Sellars, Quine, Ryle and others – away from classical empiricism to today’s ‘post-postivistic’ philosophy, has apparently involved the rejection of this once familiar assumption. I argue a) that the rejection of a certain kind of epistemological foundationalism does not entail the rejection of phenomenal individuals tout court; and b) that qualia are in fact, in some epistemologically significant ways, given (pace Sellars et al.). |
id |
UNICAMP-17_33c6a93a848dc19dd126afbc44086d51 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8644035 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-17 |
network_name_str |
Manuscrito (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
THE MYTH OF THE MYTH OF THE GIVENGivenness. Qualia. Consciousness. SellarsQualia have historically been thought to stand in a very different epistemological relation to the knower than does the external furniture of the world. The ‘raw feels’ of thought were often said to be ‘given’, while what we might call the content of that thought – for example, claims about the external world – was thought only more or less doubtfully true; and this was often said to be because we are ‘directly’ or ‘non-inferentially’ confronted by qualia or experiences, whereas all other properties or objects are only mediately ‘connected’ to the perceiver. The modern turn in philosophy – spearheaded by Wittgenstein, Sellars, Quine, Ryle and others – away from classical empiricism to today’s ‘post-postivistic’ philosophy, has apparently involved the rejection of this once familiar assumption. I argue a) that the rejection of a certain kind of epistemological foundationalism does not entail the rejection of phenomenal individuals tout court; and b) that qualia are in fact, in some epistemologically significant ways, given (pace Sellars et al.).Universidade Estadual de Campinas2016-03-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644035Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 27 n. 2 (2004): Jul./Dez.; 321-360Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 27 No. 2 (2004): Jul./Dez.; 321-360Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 27 Núm. 2 (2004): Jul./Dez.; 321-3602317-630Xreponame:Manuscrito (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644035/11480Copyright (c) 2004 Manuscritoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBailey, Andrew2016-03-09T13:20:18Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8644035Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscritoPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/oaimwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br2317-630X0100-6045opendoar:2016-03-09T13:20:18Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
THE MYTH OF THE MYTH OF THE GIVEN |
title |
THE MYTH OF THE MYTH OF THE GIVEN |
spellingShingle |
THE MYTH OF THE MYTH OF THE GIVEN Bailey, Andrew Givenness. Qualia. Consciousness. Sellars |
title_short |
THE MYTH OF THE MYTH OF THE GIVEN |
title_full |
THE MYTH OF THE MYTH OF THE GIVEN |
title_fullStr |
THE MYTH OF THE MYTH OF THE GIVEN |
title_full_unstemmed |
THE MYTH OF THE MYTH OF THE GIVEN |
title_sort |
THE MYTH OF THE MYTH OF THE GIVEN |
author |
Bailey, Andrew |
author_facet |
Bailey, Andrew |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bailey, Andrew |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Givenness. Qualia. Consciousness. Sellars |
topic |
Givenness. Qualia. Consciousness. Sellars |
description |
Qualia have historically been thought to stand in a very different epistemological relation to the knower than does the external furniture of the world. The ‘raw feels’ of thought were often said to be ‘given’, while what we might call the content of that thought – for example, claims about the external world – was thought only more or less doubtfully true; and this was often said to be because we are ‘directly’ or ‘non-inferentially’ confronted by qualia or experiences, whereas all other properties or objects are only mediately ‘connected’ to the perceiver. The modern turn in philosophy – spearheaded by Wittgenstein, Sellars, Quine, Ryle and others – away from classical empiricism to today’s ‘post-postivistic’ philosophy, has apparently involved the rejection of this once familiar assumption. I argue a) that the rejection of a certain kind of epistemological foundationalism does not entail the rejection of phenomenal individuals tout court; and b) that qualia are in fact, in some epistemologically significant ways, given (pace Sellars et al.). |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-03-09 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644035 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644035 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644035/11480 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2004 Manuscrito info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2004 Manuscrito |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 27 n. 2 (2004): Jul./Dez.; 321-360 Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 27 No. 2 (2004): Jul./Dez.; 321-360 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 27 Núm. 2 (2004): Jul./Dez.; 321-360 2317-630X reponame:Manuscrito (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Manuscrito (Online) |
collection |
Manuscrito (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800216566150725632 |