THE MYTH OF THE MYTH OF THE GIVEN

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bailey, Andrew
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Manuscrito (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644035
Resumo: Qualia have historically been thought to stand in a very different epistemological relation to the knower than does the external furniture of the world. The ‘raw feels’ of thought were often said to be ‘given’, while what we might call the content of that thought – for example, claims about the external world – was thought only more or less doubtfully true; and this was often said to be because we are ‘directly’ or ‘non-inferentially’ confronted by qualia or experiences, whereas all other properties or objects are only mediately ‘connected’ to the perceiver. The modern turn in philosophy – spearheaded by Wittgenstein, Sellars, Quine, Ryle and others – away from classical empiricism to today’s ‘post-postivistic’ philosophy, has apparently involved the rejection of this once familiar assumption. I argue a) that the rejection of a certain kind of epistemological foundationalism does not entail the rejection of phenomenal individuals tout court; and b) that qualia are in fact, in some epistemologically significant ways, given (pace Sellars et al.).
id UNICAMP-17_33c6a93a848dc19dd126afbc44086d51
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8644035
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-17
network_name_str Manuscrito (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling THE MYTH OF THE MYTH OF THE GIVENGivenness. Qualia. Consciousness. SellarsQualia have historically been thought to stand in a very different epistemological relation to the knower than does the external furniture of the world. The ‘raw feels’ of thought were often said to be ‘given’, while what we might call the content of that thought – for example, claims about the external world – was thought only more or less doubtfully true; and this was often said to be because we are ‘directly’ or ‘non-inferentially’ confronted by qualia or experiences, whereas all other properties or objects are only mediately ‘connected’ to the perceiver. The modern turn in philosophy – spearheaded by Wittgenstein, Sellars, Quine, Ryle and others – away from classical empiricism to today’s ‘post-postivistic’ philosophy, has apparently involved the rejection of this once familiar assumption. I argue a) that the rejection of a certain kind of epistemological foundationalism does not entail the rejection of phenomenal individuals tout court; and b) that qualia are in fact, in some epistemologically significant ways, given (pace Sellars et al.).Universidade Estadual de Campinas2016-03-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644035Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 27 n. 2 (2004): Jul./Dez.; 321-360Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 27 No. 2 (2004): Jul./Dez.; 321-360Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 27 Núm. 2 (2004): Jul./Dez.; 321-3602317-630Xreponame:Manuscrito (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644035/11480Copyright (c) 2004 Manuscritoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBailey, Andrew2016-03-09T13:20:18Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8644035Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscritoPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/oaimwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br2317-630X0100-6045opendoar:2016-03-09T13:20:18Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv THE MYTH OF THE MYTH OF THE GIVEN
title THE MYTH OF THE MYTH OF THE GIVEN
spellingShingle THE MYTH OF THE MYTH OF THE GIVEN
Bailey, Andrew
Givenness. Qualia. Consciousness. Sellars
title_short THE MYTH OF THE MYTH OF THE GIVEN
title_full THE MYTH OF THE MYTH OF THE GIVEN
title_fullStr THE MYTH OF THE MYTH OF THE GIVEN
title_full_unstemmed THE MYTH OF THE MYTH OF THE GIVEN
title_sort THE MYTH OF THE MYTH OF THE GIVEN
author Bailey, Andrew
author_facet Bailey, Andrew
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bailey, Andrew
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Givenness. Qualia. Consciousness. Sellars
topic Givenness. Qualia. Consciousness. Sellars
description Qualia have historically been thought to stand in a very different epistemological relation to the knower than does the external furniture of the world. The ‘raw feels’ of thought were often said to be ‘given’, while what we might call the content of that thought – for example, claims about the external world – was thought only more or less doubtfully true; and this was often said to be because we are ‘directly’ or ‘non-inferentially’ confronted by qualia or experiences, whereas all other properties or objects are only mediately ‘connected’ to the perceiver. The modern turn in philosophy – spearheaded by Wittgenstein, Sellars, Quine, Ryle and others – away from classical empiricism to today’s ‘post-postivistic’ philosophy, has apparently involved the rejection of this once familiar assumption. I argue a) that the rejection of a certain kind of epistemological foundationalism does not entail the rejection of phenomenal individuals tout court; and b) that qualia are in fact, in some epistemologically significant ways, given (pace Sellars et al.).
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-03-09
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644035
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644035
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644035/11480
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2004 Manuscrito
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2004 Manuscrito
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 27 n. 2 (2004): Jul./Dez.; 321-360
Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 27 No. 2 (2004): Jul./Dez.; 321-360
Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 27 Núm. 2 (2004): Jul./Dez.; 321-360
2317-630X
reponame:Manuscrito (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Manuscrito (Online)
collection Manuscrito (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br
_version_ 1800216566150725632