McDowell e as estátuas de Dédalo

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Torres, João Carlos Brum
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Manuscrito (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8647851
Resumo: The subject of this paper is the concept of ‘demonstrative concept’, which has been introduced in philosophy by John McDowell in Mind and World. The analysis presented in the article has a reconstructive and a critical character. Its reconstructive drive may be viewed as required by the concise mode the philosopher adopted to present his theoretical innovation and comprehends an effort to make clear: (i) what is the difference between the temporal conditions necessary (a) to give conceptual status to the color shade we have before our eyes and (b) to our possession of ordinary concepts; (ii) the sui generis character of the universality proper to demonstrative concepts and the uniformity of their relations to what they are concepts of; (iii) the equivalence of their semantical regime to that which is proper to concepts of measurement standards; (iv) the very singular function performed by memory in the constitution and possession of demonstrative concepts. Now, the critical character of the paper firstly lies in the remark that there is a kind of inconsequence in the way McDowell conceives the employment of those concepts, namely in his refusal to admit that even though it is natural to say ‘I see the shade in my mind’s eye’, it would be a mistake to think that when we recognize a color shade as being the same as the one we have seen before there is an inner comparison of it with the retained sample. The second of the paper critical points is the warning that, considering the complex constitution process of demonstrative concepts and its exacting semantic, it seems impossible to take them as coextensive to our human experience of colors.
id UNICAMP-17_383d0dc70381a61c57d5b54eed0cabb5
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8647851
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-17
network_name_str Manuscrito (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling McDowell e as estátuas de DédaloConceito demonstrativo. Memória. Posse de conceitos. Formação de conceitosThe subject of this paper is the concept of ‘demonstrative concept’, which has been introduced in philosophy by John McDowell in Mind and World. The analysis presented in the article has a reconstructive and a critical character. Its reconstructive drive may be viewed as required by the concise mode the philosopher adopted to present his theoretical innovation and comprehends an effort to make clear: (i) what is the difference between the temporal conditions necessary (a) to give conceptual status to the color shade we have before our eyes and (b) to our possession of ordinary concepts; (ii) the sui generis character of the universality proper to demonstrative concepts and the uniformity of their relations to what they are concepts of; (iii) the equivalence of their semantical regime to that which is proper to concepts of measurement standards; (iv) the very singular function performed by memory in the constitution and possession of demonstrative concepts. Now, the critical character of the paper firstly lies in the remark that there is a kind of inconsequence in the way McDowell conceives the employment of those concepts, namely in his refusal to admit that even though it is natural to say ‘I see the shade in my mind’s eye’, it would be a mistake to think that when we recognize a color shade as being the same as the one we have seen before there is an inner comparison of it with the retained sample. The second of the paper critical points is the warning that, considering the complex constitution process of demonstrative concepts and its exacting semantic, it seems impossible to take them as coextensive to our human experience of colors.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2017-03-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAnálise lógicaapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8647851Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 39 n. 3 (2016): jul./set.; 199-235Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 39 No. 3 (2016): jul./set.; 199-235Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 39 Núm. 3 (2016): jul./set.; 199-2352317-630Xreponame:Manuscrito (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8647851/14626Copyright (c) 2016 Manuscritoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTorres, João Carlos Brum2017-11-09T09:17:52Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8647851Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscritoPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/oaimwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br2317-630X0100-6045opendoar:2017-11-09T09:17:52Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv McDowell e as estátuas de Dédalo
title McDowell e as estátuas de Dédalo
spellingShingle McDowell e as estátuas de Dédalo
Torres, João Carlos Brum
Conceito demonstrativo. Memória. Posse de conceitos. Formação de conceitos
title_short McDowell e as estátuas de Dédalo
title_full McDowell e as estátuas de Dédalo
title_fullStr McDowell e as estátuas de Dédalo
title_full_unstemmed McDowell e as estátuas de Dédalo
title_sort McDowell e as estátuas de Dédalo
author Torres, João Carlos Brum
author_facet Torres, João Carlos Brum
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Torres, João Carlos Brum
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Conceito demonstrativo. Memória. Posse de conceitos. Formação de conceitos
topic Conceito demonstrativo. Memória. Posse de conceitos. Formação de conceitos
description The subject of this paper is the concept of ‘demonstrative concept’, which has been introduced in philosophy by John McDowell in Mind and World. The analysis presented in the article has a reconstructive and a critical character. Its reconstructive drive may be viewed as required by the concise mode the philosopher adopted to present his theoretical innovation and comprehends an effort to make clear: (i) what is the difference between the temporal conditions necessary (a) to give conceptual status to the color shade we have before our eyes and (b) to our possession of ordinary concepts; (ii) the sui generis character of the universality proper to demonstrative concepts and the uniformity of their relations to what they are concepts of; (iii) the equivalence of their semantical regime to that which is proper to concepts of measurement standards; (iv) the very singular function performed by memory in the constitution and possession of demonstrative concepts. Now, the critical character of the paper firstly lies in the remark that there is a kind of inconsequence in the way McDowell conceives the employment of those concepts, namely in his refusal to admit that even though it is natural to say ‘I see the shade in my mind’s eye’, it would be a mistake to think that when we recognize a color shade as being the same as the one we have seen before there is an inner comparison of it with the retained sample. The second of the paper critical points is the warning that, considering the complex constitution process of demonstrative concepts and its exacting semantic, it seems impossible to take them as coextensive to our human experience of colors.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-03-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Análise lógica
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8647851
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8647851
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8647851/14626
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Manuscrito
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Manuscrito
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 39 n. 3 (2016): jul./set.; 199-235
Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 39 No. 3 (2016): jul./set.; 199-235
Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 39 Núm. 3 (2016): jul./set.; 199-235
2317-630X
reponame:Manuscrito (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Manuscrito (Online)
collection Manuscrito (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br
_version_ 1800216566646702080