Did the slingshots hit the mark?: reply to Marco Ruffino

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Chateaubriand, Oswaldo
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Manuscrito (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644293
Resumo: In §§1-2 I argue that Marco misidentifies my main objections to the Church and Gödel slingshot arguments and that his defense of these arguments does not overcome those objections. In §3 I discuss his criticisms of my theory of descriptions in relation to Church’s argument.
id UNICAMP-17_3c8b0c6c62e74d63fbd4697cc98aa2a4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8644293
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-17
network_name_str Manuscrito (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Did the slingshots hit the mark?: reply to Marco RuffinoSlingshot arguments. Church. Gödel. Frege. Russell. Definite descriptionsIn §§1-2 I argue that Marco misidentifies my main objections to the Church and Gödel slingshot arguments and that his defense of these arguments does not overcome those objections. In §3 I discuss his criticisms of my theory of descriptions in relation to Church’s argument.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2016-03-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644293Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 27 n. 1 (2004): Jan./Jun.; 211-225Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 27 No. 1 (2004): Jan./Jun.; 211-225Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 27 Núm. 1 (2004): Jan./Jun.; 211-2252317-630Xreponame:Manuscrito (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644293/11718Copyright (c) 2004 Manuscritoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessChateaubriand, Oswaldo2016-03-16T15:49:02Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8644293Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscritoPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/oaimwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br2317-630X0100-6045opendoar:2016-03-16T15:49:02Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Did the slingshots hit the mark?: reply to Marco Ruffino
title Did the slingshots hit the mark?: reply to Marco Ruffino
spellingShingle Did the slingshots hit the mark?: reply to Marco Ruffino
Chateaubriand, Oswaldo
Slingshot arguments. Church. Gödel. Frege. Russell. Definite descriptions
title_short Did the slingshots hit the mark?: reply to Marco Ruffino
title_full Did the slingshots hit the mark?: reply to Marco Ruffino
title_fullStr Did the slingshots hit the mark?: reply to Marco Ruffino
title_full_unstemmed Did the slingshots hit the mark?: reply to Marco Ruffino
title_sort Did the slingshots hit the mark?: reply to Marco Ruffino
author Chateaubriand, Oswaldo
author_facet Chateaubriand, Oswaldo
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Chateaubriand, Oswaldo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Slingshot arguments. Church. Gödel. Frege. Russell. Definite descriptions
topic Slingshot arguments. Church. Gödel. Frege. Russell. Definite descriptions
description In §§1-2 I argue that Marco misidentifies my main objections to the Church and Gödel slingshot arguments and that his defense of these arguments does not overcome those objections. In §3 I discuss his criticisms of my theory of descriptions in relation to Church’s argument.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-03-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644293
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644293
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644293/11718
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2004 Manuscrito
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2004 Manuscrito
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 27 n. 1 (2004): Jan./Jun.; 211-225
Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 27 No. 1 (2004): Jan./Jun.; 211-225
Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 27 Núm. 1 (2004): Jan./Jun.; 211-225
2317-630X
reponame:Manuscrito (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Manuscrito (Online)
collection Manuscrito (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br
_version_ 1800216566175891457