The principle of wholistic reference
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Manuscrito (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644254 |
Resumo: | In its strongest, unqualified form the principle of wholistic reference is that each and every proposition refers to the whole universe of discourse as such, regardless how limited the referents of its non-logical or content terms. Even though Boole changed from a monistic fixed-universe framework in his earlier works of 1847 and 1848 to a pluralistic multiple-universe framework in his mature treatise of 1854, he never wavered in his frank avowal of the principle of wholistic reference, possibly in a slightly weaker form. Indeed, he took it as an essential accompaniment to his theory of concept formation and proposition formation. Similar views are found in later logicians, and some of the most recent formulations of standard, one-sorted first-order logic seem to be in accord with a form of it, if they do not actually imply the principle itself. |
id |
UNICAMP-17_43730faefe5320d91184489c3d600f14 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8644254 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-17 |
network_name_str |
Manuscrito (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The principle of wholistic referenceChateaubriand. Sentence. Proposition. Label. Pointer. Logically perfect language. Universe of discourseIn its strongest, unqualified form the principle of wholistic reference is that each and every proposition refers to the whole universe of discourse as such, regardless how limited the referents of its non-logical or content terms. Even though Boole changed from a monistic fixed-universe framework in his earlier works of 1847 and 1848 to a pluralistic multiple-universe framework in his mature treatise of 1854, he never wavered in his frank avowal of the principle of wholistic reference, possibly in a slightly weaker form. Indeed, he took it as an essential accompaniment to his theory of concept formation and proposition formation. Similar views are found in later logicians, and some of the most recent formulations of standard, one-sorted first-order logic seem to be in accord with a form of it, if they do not actually imply the principle itself.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2016-03-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644254Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 27 n. 1 (2004): Jan./Jun.; 159-171Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 27 No. 1 (2004): Jan./Jun.; 159-171Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 27 Núm. 1 (2004): Jan./Jun.; 159-1712317-630Xreponame:Manuscrito (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644254/11680Copyright (c) 2004 Manuscritoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCorcoran, John2016-03-16T15:49:02Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8644254Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscritoPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/oaimwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br2317-630X0100-6045opendoar:2016-03-16T15:49:02Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The principle of wholistic reference |
title |
The principle of wholistic reference |
spellingShingle |
The principle of wholistic reference Corcoran, John Chateaubriand. Sentence. Proposition. Label. Pointer. Logically perfect language. Universe of discourse |
title_short |
The principle of wholistic reference |
title_full |
The principle of wholistic reference |
title_fullStr |
The principle of wholistic reference |
title_full_unstemmed |
The principle of wholistic reference |
title_sort |
The principle of wholistic reference |
author |
Corcoran, John |
author_facet |
Corcoran, John |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Corcoran, John |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Chateaubriand. Sentence. Proposition. Label. Pointer. Logically perfect language. Universe of discourse |
topic |
Chateaubriand. Sentence. Proposition. Label. Pointer. Logically perfect language. Universe of discourse |
description |
In its strongest, unqualified form the principle of wholistic reference is that each and every proposition refers to the whole universe of discourse as such, regardless how limited the referents of its non-logical or content terms. Even though Boole changed from a monistic fixed-universe framework in his earlier works of 1847 and 1848 to a pluralistic multiple-universe framework in his mature treatise of 1854, he never wavered in his frank avowal of the principle of wholistic reference, possibly in a slightly weaker form. Indeed, he took it as an essential accompaniment to his theory of concept formation and proposition formation. Similar views are found in later logicians, and some of the most recent formulations of standard, one-sorted first-order logic seem to be in accord with a form of it, if they do not actually imply the principle itself. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-03-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644254 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644254 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644254/11680 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2004 Manuscrito info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2004 Manuscrito |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 27 n. 1 (2004): Jan./Jun.; 159-171 Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 27 No. 1 (2004): Jan./Jun.; 159-171 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 27 Núm. 1 (2004): Jan./Jun.; 159-171 2317-630X reponame:Manuscrito (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Manuscrito (Online) |
collection |
Manuscrito (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800216566170648576 |