Science, rhetoric, and the sociology of knowledge: a critique of dascal’s view of scientific controversies
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Manuscrito (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644573 |
Resumo: | Dascal’s position on scientific controversies is submitted to a critical examination. It is pointed out that his distinction between knowledge and understanding, between ‘hard rationality’ and ‘soft rationality’ is unlikely to survive sustained critical probing. What is egregiously missing in his approach is a recognition of the role of so-called ‘sociology of knowledge’ in the way scientific controversies play out. It is argued that, insofar as they constitute pragmatic events, scientific controversies cannot be studied properly without taking into account their inalienable sociological dimension. |
id |
UNICAMP-17_46871a4378b79418a0fcb91231f90174 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8644573 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-17 |
network_name_str |
Manuscrito (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Science, rhetoric, and the sociology of knowledge: a critique of dascal’s view of scientific controversiesSciencerhetoricsociology of knowledgecoutroversiesrationalityspeech actsDascal’s position on scientific controversies is submitted to a critical examination. It is pointed out that his distinction between knowledge and understanding, between ‘hard rationality’ and ‘soft rationality’ is unlikely to survive sustained critical probing. What is egregiously missing in his approach is a recognition of the role of so-called ‘sociology of knowledge’ in the way scientific controversies play out. It is argued that, insofar as they constitute pragmatic events, scientific controversies cannot be studied properly without taking into account their inalienable sociological dimension.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2016-03-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644573Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 25 n. 2 (2002): Jul./Dez.; 433-464Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 25 No. 2 (2002): Jul./Dez.; 433-464Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 25 Núm. 2 (2002): Jul./Dez.; 433-4642317-630Xreponame:Manuscrito (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644573/11978Copyright (c) 2002 Manuscritoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRajagopalan, Kanavillil2017-04-20T11:55:31Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8644573Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscritoPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/oaimwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br2317-630X0100-6045opendoar:2017-04-20T11:55:31Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Science, rhetoric, and the sociology of knowledge: a critique of dascal’s view of scientific controversies |
title |
Science, rhetoric, and the sociology of knowledge: a critique of dascal’s view of scientific controversies |
spellingShingle |
Science, rhetoric, and the sociology of knowledge: a critique of dascal’s view of scientific controversies Rajagopalan, Kanavillil Science rhetoric sociology of knowledge coutroversies rationality speech acts |
title_short |
Science, rhetoric, and the sociology of knowledge: a critique of dascal’s view of scientific controversies |
title_full |
Science, rhetoric, and the sociology of knowledge: a critique of dascal’s view of scientific controversies |
title_fullStr |
Science, rhetoric, and the sociology of knowledge: a critique of dascal’s view of scientific controversies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Science, rhetoric, and the sociology of knowledge: a critique of dascal’s view of scientific controversies |
title_sort |
Science, rhetoric, and the sociology of knowledge: a critique of dascal’s view of scientific controversies |
author |
Rajagopalan, Kanavillil |
author_facet |
Rajagopalan, Kanavillil |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rajagopalan, Kanavillil |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Science rhetoric sociology of knowledge coutroversies rationality speech acts |
topic |
Science rhetoric sociology of knowledge coutroversies rationality speech acts |
description |
Dascal’s position on scientific controversies is submitted to a critical examination. It is pointed out that his distinction between knowledge and understanding, between ‘hard rationality’ and ‘soft rationality’ is unlikely to survive sustained critical probing. What is egregiously missing in his approach is a recognition of the role of so-called ‘sociology of knowledge’ in the way scientific controversies play out. It is argued that, insofar as they constitute pragmatic events, scientific controversies cannot be studied properly without taking into account their inalienable sociological dimension. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-03-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644573 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644573 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644573/11978 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2002 Manuscrito info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2002 Manuscrito |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 25 n. 2 (2002): Jul./Dez.; 433-464 Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 25 No. 2 (2002): Jul./Dez.; 433-464 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 25 Núm. 2 (2002): Jul./Dez.; 433-464 2317-630X reponame:Manuscrito (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Manuscrito (Online) |
collection |
Manuscrito (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800216566223077376 |