Beyond the limits of thought
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 1997 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Manuscrito (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8669341 |
Resumo: | Graham Priest's excellent and thought-provoking new book, Beyond the of Thought, studies the interaction be ween themes. The first theme that there thought the second there be contradictions that are true. connection between ideas is expressed Wittgenstein's remark from the introduction Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus: order to able draw limit to thought, we should have to both sides the limit think able". On the one hand there are excellent reasons for suppos that there are limits what we, finite and limited crea tures, can think On other hand, attempts say what these limits are almost invariably up contravening the very limits that being For example, Kant drew distinc tion phenomenal world, partly the construct of human thought, and hence graspable by thought, and the is in which thought cannot have access to. But his claim that nothing can be said about the noumenal itself says something about the noumenal and hence contradicts Kant’s claim that the noumenal cannot be conceived of. |
id |
UNICAMP-17_720107222eb8cc05e1a5043718865eb5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8669341 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-17 |
network_name_str |
Manuscrito (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Beyond the limits of thoughtResenha-LógicaResenha-LimiteResenha-Filosofia da lógicaGraham Priest's excellent and thought-provoking new book, Beyond the of Thought, studies the interaction be ween themes. The first theme that there thought the second there be contradictions that are true. connection between ideas is expressed Wittgenstein's remark from the introduction Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus: order to able draw limit to thought, we should have to both sides the limit think able". On the one hand there are excellent reasons for suppos that there are limits what we, finite and limited crea tures, can think On other hand, attempts say what these limits are almost invariably up contravening the very limits that being For example, Kant drew distinc tion phenomenal world, partly the construct of human thought, and hence graspable by thought, and the is in which thought cannot have access to. But his claim that nothing can be said about the noumenal itself says something about the noumenal and hence contradicts Kant’s claim that the noumenal cannot be conceived of.Universidade Estadual de Campinas1997-04-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8669341Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 20 n. 1 (1997): abr.; 103-110Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 20 No. 1 (1997): Apr.; 103-110Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 20 Núm. 1 (1997): abr.; 103-1102317-630Xreponame:Manuscrito (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8669341/28612Global; ContemporâneoCopyright (c) 1997 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofiahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEvnine, Simon2022-05-27T14:38:16Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8669341Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscritoPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/oaimwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br2317-630X0100-6045opendoar:2022-05-27T14:38:16Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Beyond the limits of thought |
title |
Beyond the limits of thought |
spellingShingle |
Beyond the limits of thought Evnine, Simon Resenha-Lógica Resenha-Limite Resenha-Filosofia da lógica |
title_short |
Beyond the limits of thought |
title_full |
Beyond the limits of thought |
title_fullStr |
Beyond the limits of thought |
title_full_unstemmed |
Beyond the limits of thought |
title_sort |
Beyond the limits of thought |
author |
Evnine, Simon |
author_facet |
Evnine, Simon |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Evnine, Simon |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Resenha-Lógica Resenha-Limite Resenha-Filosofia da lógica |
topic |
Resenha-Lógica Resenha-Limite Resenha-Filosofia da lógica |
description |
Graham Priest's excellent and thought-provoking new book, Beyond the of Thought, studies the interaction be ween themes. The first theme that there thought the second there be contradictions that are true. connection between ideas is expressed Wittgenstein's remark from the introduction Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus: order to able draw limit to thought, we should have to both sides the limit think able". On the one hand there are excellent reasons for suppos that there are limits what we, finite and limited crea tures, can think On other hand, attempts say what these limits are almost invariably up contravening the very limits that being For example, Kant drew distinc tion phenomenal world, partly the construct of human thought, and hence graspable by thought, and the is in which thought cannot have access to. But his claim that nothing can be said about the noumenal itself says something about the noumenal and hence contradicts Kant’s claim that the noumenal cannot be conceived of. |
publishDate |
1997 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
1997-04-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Texto |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8669341 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8669341 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8669341/28612 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 1997 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 1997 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Global; Contemporâneo |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 20 n. 1 (1997): abr.; 103-110 Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 20 No. 1 (1997): Apr.; 103-110 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 20 Núm. 1 (1997): abr.; 103-110 2317-630X reponame:Manuscrito (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Manuscrito (Online) |
collection |
Manuscrito (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800216568443961344 |