How to describe mental events?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Manuscrito (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8643596 |
Resumo: | In What is it like to be a bat?, Thomas Nagel (1974) examines the polemic question about the description of mental events and suggests that only what he calls an objective phenomenology, yet to be formulated in a distant future, could finally confer the universal dimension of scientific statements, regarded as third person discourse par excellence, to those mental statements, which characteristic is to preserve the first person perspective. The present paper intends to show that George Politzer’s and Ludwig Wittgenstein’s philosophies of psychology, despite their different theoretical approaches, had already pointed out, far before Nagel’s article, that the dilemma concerning the objectivity of third person perspective of science and the first person perspective of mental statements is a consequence of the illusion that one has, from the first person perspective, a privileged access to one’s own mental events. Wittgenstein’s argument on the impossibility of a private language and Politzer’s notion of drama as constituting the very psychological fact in stead of what he calls “Classical Psychology” concepts of “mind” and “behaviour”, both converge to the deconstruction of the ancient illusion of an “interior life” which anticipates, and therefore determines linguistic practices. In other words, this paper aims to point out that only from a linguistic realm, therefore, from an universal perspective, it is possible to construct a particular discourse – that one regarding ones own mental events. |
id |
UNICAMP-17_9d77177aedc56968a29e5b58bad890c0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8643596 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-17 |
network_name_str |
Manuscrito (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
How to describe mental events?Como descrever eventos mentais?Thomas NagelWittgensteinPolitzerEstados mentaisFenomenologia.Thomas NagelWittgensteinPolitzerMental statesPhenomenology.In What is it like to be a bat?, Thomas Nagel (1974) examines the polemic question about the description of mental events and suggests that only what he calls an objective phenomenology, yet to be formulated in a distant future, could finally confer the universal dimension of scientific statements, regarded as third person discourse par excellence, to those mental statements, which characteristic is to preserve the first person perspective. The present paper intends to show that George Politzer’s and Ludwig Wittgenstein’s philosophies of psychology, despite their different theoretical approaches, had already pointed out, far before Nagel’s article, that the dilemma concerning the objectivity of third person perspective of science and the first person perspective of mental statements is a consequence of the illusion that one has, from the first person perspective, a privileged access to one’s own mental events. Wittgenstein’s argument on the impossibility of a private language and Politzer’s notion of drama as constituting the very psychological fact in stead of what he calls “Classical Psychology” concepts of “mind” and “behaviour”, both converge to the deconstruction of the ancient illusion of an “interior life” which anticipates, and therefore determines linguistic practices. In other words, this paper aims to point out that only from a linguistic realm, therefore, from an universal perspective, it is possible to construct a particular discourse – that one regarding ones own mental events.Em Como é ser um morcego?, Thomas Nagel (1974) examina a polêmica questão da descrição dos eventos mentais e sugere que somente uma fenomenologia objetiva, ainda por ser construída, seria capaz de dar conta da dimensão universal característica dos enunciados da ciência – pensada como discurso da terceira pessoa –, ao mesmo tempo em que salvaguardaria o caráter particular atribuído aos estados mentais, acerca dos quais se supõe que a perspectiva da primeira pessoa detenha um conhecimento privilegiado. A presente comunicação pretende mostrar, a partir das críticas à psicologia formuladas por filósofos contemporâneos de tradições distintas, como Wittgenstein e Georges Politzer, que esse impasse em torno do cunho subjetivo dos eventos mentais e a descrição objetiva dos mesmos requerida pela ciência repousa justamente na ilusão de que se tem, na primeira pessoa, acesso privilegiado aos próprios estados mentais. A impossibilidade de uma linguagem privada, apontada por Wittgenstein, assim como a noção de “drama”, proposta por Politzer como constituindo o fato psicológico por excelência, parecem fazer convergir as vertentes continental e anglo-saxã da filosofia contemporânea no que tange à desconstrução da antiga ilusão de uma vida interior que antecederia as práticas lingüísticas. Em uma palavra, pretende-se mostrar que é somente no âmbito da linguagem – portanto, de uma perspectiva universal –, que se constrói um discurso do particular – aquele acerca dos próprios eventos mentais.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2016-02-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8643596Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 29 n. 2 (2006): Jul./Dec.; 551-574Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 29 No. 2 (2006): Jul./Dec.; 551-574Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 29 Núm. 2 (2006): Jul./Dec.; 551-5742317-630Xreponame:Manuscrito (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8643596/11118Brazil; ContemporaryBrasil; ContemporâneoCopyright (c) 2006 Manuscritoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMontenegro, Maria Aparecida2019-12-04T15:57:42Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8643596Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscritoPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/oaimwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br2317-630X0100-6045opendoar:2019-12-04T15:57:42Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
How to describe mental events? Como descrever eventos mentais? |
title |
How to describe mental events? |
spellingShingle |
How to describe mental events? Montenegro, Maria Aparecida Thomas Nagel Wittgenstein Politzer Estados mentais Fenomenologia. Thomas Nagel Wittgenstein Politzer Mental states Phenomenology. |
title_short |
How to describe mental events? |
title_full |
How to describe mental events? |
title_fullStr |
How to describe mental events? |
title_full_unstemmed |
How to describe mental events? |
title_sort |
How to describe mental events? |
author |
Montenegro, Maria Aparecida |
author_facet |
Montenegro, Maria Aparecida |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Montenegro, Maria Aparecida |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Thomas Nagel Wittgenstein Politzer Estados mentais Fenomenologia. Thomas Nagel Wittgenstein Politzer Mental states Phenomenology. |
topic |
Thomas Nagel Wittgenstein Politzer Estados mentais Fenomenologia. Thomas Nagel Wittgenstein Politzer Mental states Phenomenology. |
description |
In What is it like to be a bat?, Thomas Nagel (1974) examines the polemic question about the description of mental events and suggests that only what he calls an objective phenomenology, yet to be formulated in a distant future, could finally confer the universal dimension of scientific statements, regarded as third person discourse par excellence, to those mental statements, which characteristic is to preserve the first person perspective. The present paper intends to show that George Politzer’s and Ludwig Wittgenstein’s philosophies of psychology, despite their different theoretical approaches, had already pointed out, far before Nagel’s article, that the dilemma concerning the objectivity of third person perspective of science and the first person perspective of mental statements is a consequence of the illusion that one has, from the first person perspective, a privileged access to one’s own mental events. Wittgenstein’s argument on the impossibility of a private language and Politzer’s notion of drama as constituting the very psychological fact in stead of what he calls “Classical Psychology” concepts of “mind” and “behaviour”, both converge to the deconstruction of the ancient illusion of an “interior life” which anticipates, and therefore determines linguistic practices. In other words, this paper aims to point out that only from a linguistic realm, therefore, from an universal perspective, it is possible to construct a particular discourse – that one regarding ones own mental events. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-02-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Texto info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8643596 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8643596 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8643596/11118 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2006 Manuscrito info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2006 Manuscrito |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazil; Contemporary Brasil; Contemporâneo |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 29 n. 2 (2006): Jul./Dec.; 551-574 Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 29 No. 2 (2006): Jul./Dec.; 551-574 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 29 Núm. 2 (2006): Jul./Dec.; 551-574 2317-630X reponame:Manuscrito (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Manuscrito (Online) |
collection |
Manuscrito (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800216565765898240 |