Dialogo, falacias y retorica. El caso de la falacia naturalista

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rabossi, Eduardo
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Manuscrito (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644561
Resumo: The first sections of the paper deal with the notion of a dialogue and some basic dialogic modalities. The critical or rational modality is highlighted as typical of philosophical argumentation. The following sections deal with a widespread phenomenon in current philosophical controversies: to charge the dialogic counterpart with the commission of a philosophical fallacy. The Naturalistic Fallacy is taken as the most famous example of that sort of strategy. Its structure and aims are analized, and it is concluded that, leaving aside other sorts of critical points, the accusation violates the canons of the rational dialogue.
id UNICAMP-17_a8ebfa7e52934df8ff05976c8c9779da
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8644561
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-17
network_name_str Manuscrito (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Dialogo, falacias y retorica. El caso de la falacia naturalistaDialogofalaciafalacia naturalistaretóricaéticaThe first sections of the paper deal with the notion of a dialogue and some basic dialogic modalities. The critical or rational modality is highlighted as typical of philosophical argumentation. The following sections deal with a widespread phenomenon in current philosophical controversies: to charge the dialogic counterpart with the commission of a philosophical fallacy. The Naturalistic Fallacy is taken as the most famous example of that sort of strategy. Its structure and aims are analized, and it is concluded that, leaving aside other sorts of critical points, the accusation violates the canons of the rational dialogue.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2016-03-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644561Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 25 n. 2 (2002): Jul./Dez.; 353-380Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 25 No. 2 (2002): Jul./Dez.; 353-380Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 25 Núm. 2 (2002): Jul./Dez.; 353-3802317-630Xreponame:Manuscrito (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644561/11944Copyright (c) 2002 Manuscritoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRabossi, Eduardo2016-03-29T16:22:51Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8644561Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscritoPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/oaimwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br2317-630X0100-6045opendoar:2016-03-29T16:22:51Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Dialogo, falacias y retorica. El caso de la falacia naturalista
title Dialogo, falacias y retorica. El caso de la falacia naturalista
spellingShingle Dialogo, falacias y retorica. El caso de la falacia naturalista
Rabossi, Eduardo
Dialogo
falacia
falacia naturalista
retórica
ética
title_short Dialogo, falacias y retorica. El caso de la falacia naturalista
title_full Dialogo, falacias y retorica. El caso de la falacia naturalista
title_fullStr Dialogo, falacias y retorica. El caso de la falacia naturalista
title_full_unstemmed Dialogo, falacias y retorica. El caso de la falacia naturalista
title_sort Dialogo, falacias y retorica. El caso de la falacia naturalista
author Rabossi, Eduardo
author_facet Rabossi, Eduardo
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rabossi, Eduardo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dialogo
falacia
falacia naturalista
retórica
ética
topic Dialogo
falacia
falacia naturalista
retórica
ética
description The first sections of the paper deal with the notion of a dialogue and some basic dialogic modalities. The critical or rational modality is highlighted as typical of philosophical argumentation. The following sections deal with a widespread phenomenon in current philosophical controversies: to charge the dialogic counterpart with the commission of a philosophical fallacy. The Naturalistic Fallacy is taken as the most famous example of that sort of strategy. Its structure and aims are analized, and it is concluded that, leaving aside other sorts of critical points, the accusation violates the canons of the rational dialogue.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-03-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644561
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644561
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8644561/11944
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2002 Manuscrito
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2002 Manuscrito
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 25 n. 2 (2002): Jul./Dez.; 353-380
Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 25 No. 2 (2002): Jul./Dez.; 353-380
Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 25 Núm. 2 (2002): Jul./Dez.; 353-380
2317-630X
reponame:Manuscrito (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Manuscrito (Online)
collection Manuscrito (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br
_version_ 1800216566220980224

Registros relacionados