The facticity of Kant’s fact of reason

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Purviance, Susan M.
Data de Publicação: 1998
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Manuscrito (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8665746
Resumo: It is argued that the key to understanding the Doctrine of the  Fact of Reason lies in clarifying what Kant meant by a fact for moral practice. It is suggested that the  facticity of the Fact  of Reason must be understood in both a noetic and a performative aspect. Dietrich Henrich’s interpretation is discussed, and it is argued that it risks reducing the Facto f Reason exclusively to its noetic function in moral antology, and that it ignores the fact that this is a doctrine of self-discovery, not of self-constitution.
id UNICAMP-17_b34acc1c16d02601c49359004268a7e3
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8665746
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-17
network_name_str Manuscrito (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The facticity of Kant’s fact of reasonKantFato da razãoMoralIt is argued that the key to understanding the Doctrine of the  Fact of Reason lies in clarifying what Kant meant by a fact for moral practice. It is suggested that the  facticity of the Fact  of Reason must be understood in both a noetic and a performative aspect. Dietrich Henrich’s interpretation is discussed, and it is argued that it risks reducing the Facto f Reason exclusively to its noetic function in moral antology, and that it ignores the fact that this is a doctrine of self-discovery, not of self-constitution.Universidade Estadual de Campinas1998-10-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8665746Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 21 n. 2 (1998): out.; 45-67Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 21 No. 2 (1998): Oct.; 45-67Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 21 Núm. 2 (1998): out.; 45-672317-630Xreponame:Manuscrito (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8665746/28457Estados Unidos; Contemporâneo Copyright (c) 1998 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofiahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPurviance, Susan M.2022-05-20T12:31:13Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8665746Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscritoPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/oaimwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br2317-630X0100-6045opendoar:2022-05-20T12:31:13Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The facticity of Kant’s fact of reason
title The facticity of Kant’s fact of reason
spellingShingle The facticity of Kant’s fact of reason
Purviance, Susan M.
Kant
Fato da razão
Moral
title_short The facticity of Kant’s fact of reason
title_full The facticity of Kant’s fact of reason
title_fullStr The facticity of Kant’s fact of reason
title_full_unstemmed The facticity of Kant’s fact of reason
title_sort The facticity of Kant’s fact of reason
author Purviance, Susan M.
author_facet Purviance, Susan M.
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Purviance, Susan M.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Kant
Fato da razão
Moral
topic Kant
Fato da razão
Moral
description It is argued that the key to understanding the Doctrine of the  Fact of Reason lies in clarifying what Kant meant by a fact for moral practice. It is suggested that the  facticity of the Fact  of Reason must be understood in both a noetic and a performative aspect. Dietrich Henrich’s interpretation is discussed, and it is argued that it risks reducing the Facto f Reason exclusively to its noetic function in moral antology, and that it ignores the fact that this is a doctrine of self-discovery, not of self-constitution.
publishDate 1998
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 1998-10-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Texto
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8665746
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8665746
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8665746/28457
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 1998 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 1998 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Estados Unidos; Contemporâneo
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 21 n. 2 (1998): out.; 45-67
Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 21 No. 2 (1998): Oct.; 45-67
Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 21 Núm. 2 (1998): out.; 45-67
2317-630X
reponame:Manuscrito (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Manuscrito (Online)
collection Manuscrito (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br
_version_ 1800216567978393600

Registros relacionados