Critique of practical reason: Kant's great moral project
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/4389 |
Resumo: | The purpose of this article is to present a study on the critical work of Kant's practice. A theoretical essay is made in which it seeks to unveil Kantian knowledge. Among the three famous critical exposures by Immanuel Kant (1724-1804), the Critique of Practical Reason (1788) is generally pointed out as the great moral project of the Königsberg philosopher. In the first criticism, namely, the Critique of Pure Reason (1781), speculative thinking was indicated as a kind of prolegomenon for a reflection on the autonomy of the practical scope of reason. Kant wrote the second Critique in a controversial environment, in which the Foundations of Metaphysics of Customs (1785), which serves as an introduction to the main themes of his second Critique, had suffered several attacks from his contemporaries due to their alleged abstract formulations. Thus, the Critique of Practical Reason arose motivated by the questions posed against the Foundations, however, despite having this critical environment around him, Kant did not limit that to a merely polemical work and continued his project of founding a metaphysics of morals . If, on the one hand, such a project contributed to the rejection of the mistakes of its most staunch critics, on the other, and more importantly, it wished to demonstrate the universality of rational unity that precedes virtuous human action. |
id |
UNIFEI_6858a3be5e2586f937931f0b7aa16027 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4389 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Critique of practical reason: Kant's great moral projectCrítica de la razón práctica: el gran proyecto moral de KantA Crítica da razão prática: o grande projeto moral de KantKantMoralRazão.KantMoralRazón.KantMoralReason.The purpose of this article is to present a study on the critical work of Kant's practice. A theoretical essay is made in which it seeks to unveil Kantian knowledge. Among the three famous critical exposures by Immanuel Kant (1724-1804), the Critique of Practical Reason (1788) is generally pointed out as the great moral project of the Königsberg philosopher. In the first criticism, namely, the Critique of Pure Reason (1781), speculative thinking was indicated as a kind of prolegomenon for a reflection on the autonomy of the practical scope of reason. Kant wrote the second Critique in a controversial environment, in which the Foundations of Metaphysics of Customs (1785), which serves as an introduction to the main themes of his second Critique, had suffered several attacks from his contemporaries due to their alleged abstract formulations. Thus, the Critique of Practical Reason arose motivated by the questions posed against the Foundations, however, despite having this critical environment around him, Kant did not limit that to a merely polemical work and continued his project of founding a metaphysics of morals . If, on the one hand, such a project contributed to the rejection of the mistakes of its most staunch critics, on the other, and more importantly, it wished to demonstrate the universality of rational unity that precedes virtuous human action.El propósito de este artículo es presentar un estudio sobre el trabajo crítico de la práctica de Kant. Se realiza un ensayo teórico en el que busca desvelar el conocimiento kantiano. Entre las tres famosas exposiciones críticas de Immanuel Kant (1724-1804), la Crítica de la razón práctica (1788) generalmente se señala como el gran proyecto moral del filósofo Königsberg. En la primera crítica, a saber, la Crítica de la razón pura (1781), el pensamiento especulativo se indicó como una especie de prolegómeno para una reflexión sobre la autonomía del alcance práctico de la razón. Kant escribió la segunda crítica en un ambiente controvertido, en el que la Fundamentación de la Metafísica de las Costumbres (1785), que sirve como introducción a los temas principales de su segunda Crítica, habían sufrido varios ataques de sus contemporáneos debido a sus supuestas formulaciones abstractas. Por lo tanto, la Crítica de la razón práctica surgió motivada por las preguntas formuladas contra la Fundamentación, sin embargo, a pesar de tener este entorno crítico a su alrededor, Kant no limitó eso a un trabajo meramente polémico y continuó su proyecto de fundar una metafísica de la moral. Si, por un lado, dicho proyecto contribuía al rechazo de los errores de sus críticos más acérrimos, por el otro, y lo que es más importante, deseaba demostrar la universalidad de la unidad racional que precede a la acción humana virtuosa.O objetivo do presente artigo é apresentar um estudo sobre a obra crítica da prática de Kant. Faz-se um ensaio teórico no qual se busca desvelar os saberes kantianos. Dentre as três célebres exposições críticas de Immanuel Kant (1724-1804), a Crítica da Razão Prática (1788) é geralmente apontada como o grande projeto moral do filósofo de Königsberg. Já na primeira crítica, a saber, a Crítica da Razão Pura (1781), o pensar especulativo era indicado como uma espécie de prolegômeno para uma reflexão sobre a autonomia do âmbito prático da razão. Kant escreveu a segunda crítica em um ambiente polêmico, no qual a Fundamentação da Metafísica dos Costumes (1785), que serve de introdução aos principais temas de sua segunda Crítica, havia sofrido diversos ataques de seus contemporâneos em virtude de suas pretensas formulações abstratas. Assim, a Crítica da Razão Prática surgiu motivada pelas questões colocadas contra a Fundamentação, contudo, mesmo tendo esse ambiente crítico em torno de si, Kant não limitou aquela a uma obra meramente polêmica e deu continuidade a seu projeto de fundamentação de uma metafísica da moral. Se por um lado, tal projeto contribuiu para o rechaço dos equívocos de seus críticos mais ferrenhos, por outro, e mais importante, desejou demonstrar a universalidade de unidade racional que precede a ação humana virtuosa.Research, Society and Development2020-05-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/438910.33448/rsd-v9i7.4389Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 7; e464974389Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 7; e464974389Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 7; e4649743892525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/4389/3635Copyright (c) 2020 Vitor Gomes da Silvainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Vitor Gomes da2020-08-20T18:05:03Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4389Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:28:15.727782Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Critique of practical reason: Kant's great moral project Crítica de la razón práctica: el gran proyecto moral de Kant A Crítica da razão prática: o grande projeto moral de Kant |
title |
Critique of practical reason: Kant's great moral project |
spellingShingle |
Critique of practical reason: Kant's great moral project Silva, Vitor Gomes da Kant Moral Razão. Kant Moral Razón. Kant Moral Reason. |
title_short |
Critique of practical reason: Kant's great moral project |
title_full |
Critique of practical reason: Kant's great moral project |
title_fullStr |
Critique of practical reason: Kant's great moral project |
title_full_unstemmed |
Critique of practical reason: Kant's great moral project |
title_sort |
Critique of practical reason: Kant's great moral project |
author |
Silva, Vitor Gomes da |
author_facet |
Silva, Vitor Gomes da |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Vitor Gomes da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Kant Moral Razão. Kant Moral Razón. Kant Moral Reason. |
topic |
Kant Moral Razão. Kant Moral Razón. Kant Moral Reason. |
description |
The purpose of this article is to present a study on the critical work of Kant's practice. A theoretical essay is made in which it seeks to unveil Kantian knowledge. Among the three famous critical exposures by Immanuel Kant (1724-1804), the Critique of Practical Reason (1788) is generally pointed out as the great moral project of the Königsberg philosopher. In the first criticism, namely, the Critique of Pure Reason (1781), speculative thinking was indicated as a kind of prolegomenon for a reflection on the autonomy of the practical scope of reason. Kant wrote the second Critique in a controversial environment, in which the Foundations of Metaphysics of Customs (1785), which serves as an introduction to the main themes of his second Critique, had suffered several attacks from his contemporaries due to their alleged abstract formulations. Thus, the Critique of Practical Reason arose motivated by the questions posed against the Foundations, however, despite having this critical environment around him, Kant did not limit that to a merely polemical work and continued his project of founding a metaphysics of morals . If, on the one hand, such a project contributed to the rejection of the mistakes of its most staunch critics, on the other, and more importantly, it wished to demonstrate the universality of rational unity that precedes virtuous human action. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/4389 10.33448/rsd-v9i7.4389 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/4389 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v9i7.4389 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/4389/3635 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Vitor Gomes da Silva info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Vitor Gomes da Silva |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 7; e464974389 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 7; e464974389 Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 7; e464974389 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052649929965568 |