Hume's representation argument against rationalism

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey
Data de Publicação: 1997
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Manuscrito (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8665383
Resumo: Cohon and Owen identify three problems with Hume’s argument to show that morality is not based on reason. We agree with them that Hume’s arguments are no tis such bad shape as they might seem. However, we disagree with them as to why the apparent problems in Hume’s arguments are not so serius as they appear, and raise a number of questions about their proposed solutions to these problems.  
id UNICAMP-17_b67ee228c3eac4945dddae394eaeb1ab
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8665383
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-17
network_name_str Manuscrito (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Hume's representation argument against rationalismArgumentoMoralHumeCohon and Owen identify three problems with Hume’s argument to show that morality is not based on reason. We agree with them that Hume’s arguments are no tis such bad shape as they might seem. However, we disagree with them as to why the apparent problems in Hume’s arguments are not so serius as they appear, and raise a number of questions about their proposed solutions to these problems.  Universidade Estadual de Campinas1997-10-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8665383Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 20 n. 2 (1997): out.; 77 - 94Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 20 No. 2 (1997): Oct.; 77 - 94Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 20 Núm. 2 (1997): out.; 77 - 942317-630Xreponame:Manuscrito (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8665383/28428Estados Unidos; Contemporâneo Copyright (c) 1997 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofiahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSayre-McCord, Geoffrey 2022-05-19T13:13:09Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8665383Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscritoPUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/oaimwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br2317-630X0100-6045opendoar:2022-05-19T13:13:09Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Hume's representation argument against rationalism
title Hume's representation argument against rationalism
spellingShingle Hume's representation argument against rationalism
Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey
Argumento
Moral
Hume
title_short Hume's representation argument against rationalism
title_full Hume's representation argument against rationalism
title_fullStr Hume's representation argument against rationalism
title_full_unstemmed Hume's representation argument against rationalism
title_sort Hume's representation argument against rationalism
author Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey
author_facet Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Argumento
Moral
Hume
topic Argumento
Moral
Hume
description Cohon and Owen identify three problems with Hume’s argument to show that morality is not based on reason. We agree with them that Hume’s arguments are no tis such bad shape as they might seem. However, we disagree with them as to why the apparent problems in Hume’s arguments are not so serius as they appear, and raise a number of questions about their proposed solutions to these problems.  
publishDate 1997
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 1997-10-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Texto
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8665383
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8665383
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8665383/28428
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 1997 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 1997 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Estados Unidos; Contemporâneo
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia; v. 20 n. 2 (1997): out.; 77 - 94
Manuscrito: International Journal of Philosophy; Vol. 20 No. 2 (1997): Oct.; 77 - 94
Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía; Vol. 20 Núm. 2 (1997): out.; 77 - 94
2317-630X
reponame:Manuscrito (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Manuscrito (Online)
collection Manuscrito (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manuscrito (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mwrigley@cle.unicamp.br|| dascal@spinoza.tau.ac.il||publicacoes@cle.unicamp.br
_version_ 1800216567635509248

Registros relacionados