Economic stagnation, deindustrialisation and inequality: different trajectories in Latin America
| Autor(a) principal: | |
|---|---|
| Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
| Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
| Idioma: | fra por spa |
| Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho |
| Texto Completo: | https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/rbest/article/view/14258 |
Resumo: | Why do Latin American countries suffer from long-term economic stagnation? The tendency to stagnation is not explained in the same way in large countries. In general, reprimanding accentuated the pre-existing rentier behavior of entrepreneurs. The investment rate is low, leading to greater financialization and deindustrialization, with long-term effects on growth. This particularly affects Argentina, Brazil and, to a lesser extent, Mexico, where labor is raw material for export. The binomial industrialization-deindustrialization in Mexico does not produce the effects that would be expected in terms of growth points. The reason is the withdrawal of the State and, therefore, the small effects of clusters, which do not benefit from imports. Industrialization based on “assembly” for export does not compensate for the deleterious effects of deindustrialization on the domestic market. The very high volatility has negative effects on growth. The “stop” leaves deep marks and the “go” is not sustained, which concerns all countries, more particularly Argentina. Finally and above all, the most important factor is the high inequality in both income and wealth, which Celso Furtado showed in the 1960s. These inequalities are the main cause of the trend of economic stagnation and, therefore, of low social mobility in Latin countries Americans in the long run, and explain the growing marginalization of these countries in the world economy. |
| id |
UNICAMP-22_15592a537e510a636e214842be44da4c |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:inpec.econtents.bc.unicamp.br:article/14258 |
| network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-22 |
| network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Economic stagnation, deindustrialisation and inequality: different trajectories in Latin AmericaEstagnación económica, desindustrialización y desigualdad: trayectorias diferentes en América LatinaStagnation économique, désindustrialisation et inégalité: trajectoires différentes en Amérique LatineEstagnação econômica, desindustrialização e desigualdade: diferentes trajetórias na América LatinaDésindustrialisationInégalité des revenusAmérique latineDesindustrializaçãoDesigualdade de rendaAmérica LatinaDesindustrializaciónDesigualdad de ingresosAmérica LatinaDeindustrialisationIncome inequalityLatin AmericaWhy do Latin American countries suffer from long-term economic stagnation? The tendency to stagnation is not explained in the same way in large countries. In general, reprimanding accentuated the pre-existing rentier behavior of entrepreneurs. The investment rate is low, leading to greater financialization and deindustrialization, with long-term effects on growth. This particularly affects Argentina, Brazil and, to a lesser extent, Mexico, where labor is raw material for export. The binomial industrialization-deindustrialization in Mexico does not produce the effects that would be expected in terms of growth points. The reason is the withdrawal of the State and, therefore, the small effects of clusters, which do not benefit from imports. Industrialization based on “assembly” for export does not compensate for the deleterious effects of deindustrialization on the domestic market. The very high volatility has negative effects on growth. The “stop” leaves deep marks and the “go” is not sustained, which concerns all countries, more particularly Argentina. Finally and above all, the most important factor is the high inequality in both income and wealth, which Celso Furtado showed in the 1960s. These inequalities are the main cause of the trend of economic stagnation and, therefore, of low social mobility in Latin countries Americans in the long run, and explain the growing marginalization of these countries in the world economy.¿Por qué los países latinoamericanos sufren una estagnación económica de largo plazo? La tendencia a la estagnación no se explica de la misma manera en los grandes países. En general, la reprimarización acentuó los comportamientos rentistas preexistentes. La tasa de inversión es débil, lo que fomenta la financiarización y la desindustrialización, com efectos de largo plazo sobre el crecimiento. Esto está relacionado particularmente con Argentina, Brasil y en menor medida con México, donde la mano de obra es materia prima de exportación. El binomio industrialización–desindustrialización en México no tiene los efectos que se esperarían en términos de puntos de crecimiento. La razón está en el retiro del Estado y, por tanto, los pequeños efectos de los clusters, que no se benefician de las importaciones. La industrialización por “ensamblaje” para la exportación no compensa los efectos deletéreos de la desindustrialización en el mercado interno. La gran volatilidad tuvo efectos negativos sobre el crecimiento. El “stop” deja marcas profundas y el “go” no se sostiene en el conjunto de los países, más particularmente a la Argentina. En fin y sobre todo, el factor más importante es la enorme desigualdad tanto en los ingresos como en la riqueza, tal como lo mostró Furtado en los años de 1960. Esas desigualdades son la causa principal de la tendencia al estancamiento económico y por lo tanto la débil movilidad social en los países latinoamericanos en el largo plazo, y explican la marginalización del crecimiento de esos países en la economía mundial.Pourquoi les pays latino-américaines souffrent-t-ils d’une stagnation économique sur longue période? La tendance à la stagnation ne s’explique pas de la même manière dans les grands pays latino-américains. D’une manière générale, la reprimarisation a accentué les comportements rentiers des entrepreneurs qui préexistaient. Le taux d’investissement est faible, il s’en suit une financiarisation plus importante et une désindustrialisation, celle-ci a des effets à long terme sur la croissance. Cela concerne plus particulièrement l’Argentine, le Brésil et dans une moindre mesure le Mexique, la main d’œuvre “exportée” étant sa matière première. Le couple industrialisation–désindustrialisation au Mexique ne procure pas les effets qu’on pourrait attendre en termes de points de croissance. La raison est le retrait de l’Etat et donc des effets clusters peu importants, ne se réalisant pas au bénéfice des importations. L’industrialisation par “assemblage” pour l’exportation ne compense pas les effets délétères de la désindustrialisation concernant le marché intérieur. La très forte volatilité a des effets négatifs sur la croissance. Le “stop” laisse des marques profondes et le “go” ne permet pas de retrouver, les cela concerne l’ensemble des pays mais plus particulièrement l’Argentine. Enfin et surtout, le facteur le plus important est la très forte inégalité tant des revenus que des patrimoines, ce qu’avait montré Celso Furtado dans les années 1960. Ces inégalités sont la cause principale de la tendance à la stagnation économique et donc de la faible mobilité sociale dans les pays latino-américains sur le long terme et explique la marginalisation croissante de ces pays dans l’économie mondiale.Por que os países latino-americanos sofrem com uma estagnação econômica de longo prazo? A tendência à estagnação não se explica da mesma forma nos grandes países. Em geral, a reprimarização acentuou os comportamentos rentistas pré-existentes de empresários. A taxa de investimento é baixa, acarretando maior financeirização e desindustrialização, com efeitos de longo prazo no crescimento. Isso afeta particularmente a Argentina, o Brasil e, em menor medida, o México, onde a mão de obra é matéria-prima para exportação. O binômio industrialização–desindustrialização no México não produz os efeitos que se esperaria em termos de pontos de crescimento. O motivo é a retirada do Estado e, portanto, os pequenos efeitos de clusters, que não se beneficiam das importações. A industrialização baseada em “montagem” para exportação não compensa os efeitos deletérios da desindustrialização no mercado interno. A altíssima volatilidade tem efeitos negativos sobre o crescimento. O “stop” deixa marcas profundas e o “go” não se sustenta, o que diz respeito a todos os países, mais particularmente à Argentina. Por fim e sobretudo, o fator mais importante é a elevada desigualdade tanto de renda quanto de riqueza, que Celso Furtado mostrou nos anos 1960. Essas desigualdades são a principal causa da tendência de estagnação econômica e, portanto, de baixa mobilidade social nos países latino-americanos no longo prazo, e explicam a crescente marginalização desses países na economia mundial.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2020-09-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoTextoTexteinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/rbest/article/view/1425810.20396/rbest.v2i.14258RBEST Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho; v. 2 (2020): Dossiê: Desigualdade no capitalismo contemporâneo; e020006Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho; Vol. 2 (2020): Dossier: Desigualdad en el capitalismo contemporáneo; e020006RBEST: Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho; Vol. 2 (2020): Dossier: Inequality in contemporary capitalism; e020006RBEST: Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho; Vol. 2 (2020): Dossier: Inégalités dans le capitalisme contemporain; e0200062674-9564reponame:Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalhoinstname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp)instacron:UNICAMPfraporspahttps://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/rbest/article/view/14258/9764https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/rbest/article/view/14258/10962https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/rbest/article/view/14258/10963Latin America; ContemporaryAmérica Latina; ContemporáneoAmerique latine; ContemporainAmérica Latina; ContemporâneoCopyright (c) 2020 RBEST: Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalhohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSalama, Pierre2023-04-18T14:56:40Zoai:inpec.econtents.bc.unicamp.br:article/14258Revistahttps://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/rbest/indexPUBhttps://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/rbest/oairbest@unicamp.br || ppec@unicamp.br2674-95642674-9564opendoar:2023-04-18T14:56:40Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Economic stagnation, deindustrialisation and inequality: different trajectories in Latin America Estagnación económica, desindustrialización y desigualdad: trayectorias diferentes en América Latina Stagnation économique, désindustrialisation et inégalité: trajectoires différentes en Amérique Latine Estagnação econômica, desindustrialização e desigualdade: diferentes trajetórias na América Latina |
| title |
Economic stagnation, deindustrialisation and inequality: different trajectories in Latin America |
| spellingShingle |
Economic stagnation, deindustrialisation and inequality: different trajectories in Latin America Salama, Pierre Désindustrialisation Inégalité des revenus Amérique latine Desindustrialização Desigualdade de renda América Latina Desindustrialización Desigualdad de ingresos América Latina Deindustrialisation Income inequality Latin America |
| title_short |
Economic stagnation, deindustrialisation and inequality: different trajectories in Latin America |
| title_full |
Economic stagnation, deindustrialisation and inequality: different trajectories in Latin America |
| title_fullStr |
Economic stagnation, deindustrialisation and inequality: different trajectories in Latin America |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Economic stagnation, deindustrialisation and inequality: different trajectories in Latin America |
| title_sort |
Economic stagnation, deindustrialisation and inequality: different trajectories in Latin America |
| author |
Salama, Pierre |
| author_facet |
Salama, Pierre |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Salama, Pierre |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Désindustrialisation Inégalité des revenus Amérique latine Desindustrialização Desigualdade de renda América Latina Desindustrialización Desigualdad de ingresos América Latina Deindustrialisation Income inequality Latin America |
| topic |
Désindustrialisation Inégalité des revenus Amérique latine Desindustrialização Desigualdade de renda América Latina Desindustrialización Desigualdad de ingresos América Latina Deindustrialisation Income inequality Latin America |
| description |
Why do Latin American countries suffer from long-term economic stagnation? The tendency to stagnation is not explained in the same way in large countries. In general, reprimanding accentuated the pre-existing rentier behavior of entrepreneurs. The investment rate is low, leading to greater financialization and deindustrialization, with long-term effects on growth. This particularly affects Argentina, Brazil and, to a lesser extent, Mexico, where labor is raw material for export. The binomial industrialization-deindustrialization in Mexico does not produce the effects that would be expected in terms of growth points. The reason is the withdrawal of the State and, therefore, the small effects of clusters, which do not benefit from imports. Industrialization based on “assembly” for export does not compensate for the deleterious effects of deindustrialization on the domestic market. The very high volatility has negative effects on growth. The “stop” leaves deep marks and the “go” is not sustained, which concerns all countries, more particularly Argentina. Finally and above all, the most important factor is the high inequality in both income and wealth, which Celso Furtado showed in the 1960s. These inequalities are the main cause of the trend of economic stagnation and, therefore, of low social mobility in Latin countries Americans in the long run, and explain the growing marginalization of these countries in the world economy. |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-09-13 |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Texto Texto Texte info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/rbest/article/view/14258 10.20396/rbest.v2i.14258 |
| url |
https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/rbest/article/view/14258 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.20396/rbest.v2i.14258 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
fra por spa |
| language |
fra por spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/rbest/article/view/14258/9764 https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/rbest/article/view/14258/10962 https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/rbest/article/view/14258/10963 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 RBEST: Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 RBEST: Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Latin America; Contemporary América Latina; Contemporáneo Amerique latine; Contemporain América Latina; Contemporâneo |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
RBEST Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho; v. 2 (2020): Dossiê: Desigualdade no capitalismo contemporâneo; e020006 Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho; Vol. 2 (2020): Dossier: Desigualdad en el capitalismo contemporáneo; e020006 RBEST: Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho; Vol. 2 (2020): Dossier: Inequality in contemporary capitalism; e020006 RBEST: Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho; Vol. 2 (2020): Dossier: Inégalités dans le capitalisme contemporain; e020006 2674-9564 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp) instacron:UNICAMP |
| instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp) |
| instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
| institution |
UNICAMP |
| reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho |
| collection |
Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Economia Social e do Trabalho - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rbest@unicamp.br || ppec@unicamp.br |
| _version_ |
1797049011762364416 |