Introduction to the theme

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lanna, Marcos
Data de Publicação: 2013
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Temáticas (Campinas. Online)
Texto Completo: https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/tematicas/article/view/13-40
Resumo: Marshall Sahlins used to say that “every society is made up of houses”, playing with the concept of “society made up of houses”, by C. Lévi-Strauss, contrasting it with the common sense that every society has houses. The reference is (respectfully) playful. The joke indicates just the opposite of what the concept proposes: specifying a type of society in a large narrative. This type would be neither that of elementary structures of kinship nor that of complexes, but the concept of societies with houses would be close to that of semi-complex structures, in which matrimonial prohibitions are multiplied. This “being between” elementary and complex structures is from a logical and not a historical point of view. A great neo-evolutionary narrative can be seen here, although structuralism can be said to be the opposite of this1 and Lévi-Strauss took a stand against this position in an interview with P. Lamaison2. In any case, they are not here in the realm of evolutionary conjectures; on the contrary, the concept of a society of houses requires historical analysis.
id UNICAMP-25_b9d1b9b8eb2e52bee3a81a037b9e2139
oai_identifier_str oai:inpec.econtents.bc.unicamp.br:article/11474
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-25
network_name_str Temáticas (Campinas. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Introduction to the themeIntroducción al temaIntrodução à temáticaCasasHousesCasasMarshall Sahlins used to say that “every society is made up of houses”, playing with the concept of “society made up of houses”, by C. Lévi-Strauss, contrasting it with the common sense that every society has houses. The reference is (respectfully) playful. The joke indicates just the opposite of what the concept proposes: specifying a type of society in a large narrative. This type would be neither that of elementary structures of kinship nor that of complexes, but the concept of societies with houses would be close to that of semi-complex structures, in which matrimonial prohibitions are multiplied. This “being between” elementary and complex structures is from a logical and not a historical point of view. A great neo-evolutionary narrative can be seen here, although structuralism can be said to be the opposite of this1 and Lévi-Strauss took a stand against this position in an interview with P. Lamaison2. In any case, they are not here in the realm of evolutionary conjectures; on the contrary, the concept of a society of houses requires historical analysis.Marshall Sahlins dice que “toda sociedad está formada por casas”, jugando con el concepto de “sociedad formada por casas”, de C. Lévi-Strauss, contrastándolo con el sentido común de que toda sociedad tiene casas. La referencia es (respetuosamente) juguetona. El chiste indica todo lo contrario de lo que propone el concepto: especificar un tipo de sociedad en una gran narrativa. Este tipo no sería ni el de estructuras elementales de parentesco ni el de complejos, pero el concepto de sociedades con casas se acercaría al de estructuras semicomplejas, en las que se multiplican las prohibiciones matrimoniales. Este “estar entre” estructuras elementales y complejas es desde un punto de vista lógico y no histórico. Aquí se puede ver una gran narrativa neoevolucionaria, aunque se puede decir que el estructuralismo es lo contrario1 y Lévi-Strauss se opuso a esta posición en una entrevista con P. Lamaison2. En cualquier caso, no están aquí en el ámbito de las conjeturas evolutivas; por el contrario, el concepto de sociedad de casas requiere un análisis histórico.Marshall Sahlins costuma afirmar que “toda sociedade é de casas”, brincando com o conceito de “sociedade a casas”, de C. Lévi-Strauss, contrapondo-o ao senso comum segundo o qual toda sociedade tem casas. A referência é (respeitosamente) jocosa. A brincadeira indica justamente o oposto do que o conceito propõe: especificar um tipo de sociedade em uma grande narrativa. Este tipo não seria nem o das estruturas elementares de parentesco nem o das complexas, mas o conceito de sociedades a casas estaria próximo daquele de estruturas semicomplexas, nas quais se multiplicam as proibições matrimoniais. Este “estar entre” estruturas elementares e complexas é de um ponto de vista lógico e não histórico. Pode-se ver aqui uma grande narrativa neoevolucionista, ainda que o estruturalismo possa ser dito como oposto disso1 e Lévi-Strauss tenha se posicionado contra esta posição em entrevista a P. Lamaison2 . De todo modos, não estão aqui no terreno das conjecturas evolucionistas; ao contrário, o conceito de sociedade a casas exige análise histórica.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2013-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/tematicas/article/view/13-4010.20396/tematicas.v21i42.11474Tematicas; v. 21 n. 42 (2013): CasasTematicas; Vol. 21 No. 42 (2013): CasasTematicas; Vol. 21 Núm. 42 (2013): Casas2595-315Xreponame:Temáticas (Campinas. Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/tematicas/article/view/13-40/6683Brazil; ContemporaryBrasil; ContemporáneoBrasil; ContemporâneoCopyright (c) 2013 Marcos Lannahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLanna, Marcos2021-04-26T14:28:42Zoai:inpec.econtents.bc.unicamp.br:article/11474Revistahttps://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/tematicasPUBhttps://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/tematicas/oaitmaticas@unicamp.br||2595-315X1413-2486opendoar:2021-04-26T14:28:42Temáticas (Campinas. Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Introduction to the theme
Introducción al tema
Introdução à temática
title Introduction to the theme
spellingShingle Introduction to the theme
Lanna, Marcos
Casas
Houses
Casas
title_short Introduction to the theme
title_full Introduction to the theme
title_fullStr Introduction to the theme
title_full_unstemmed Introduction to the theme
title_sort Introduction to the theme
author Lanna, Marcos
author_facet Lanna, Marcos
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lanna, Marcos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Casas
Houses
Casas
topic Casas
Houses
Casas
description Marshall Sahlins used to say that “every society is made up of houses”, playing with the concept of “society made up of houses”, by C. Lévi-Strauss, contrasting it with the common sense that every society has houses. The reference is (respectfully) playful. The joke indicates just the opposite of what the concept proposes: specifying a type of society in a large narrative. This type would be neither that of elementary structures of kinship nor that of complexes, but the concept of societies with houses would be close to that of semi-complex structures, in which matrimonial prohibitions are multiplied. This “being between” elementary and complex structures is from a logical and not a historical point of view. A great neo-evolutionary narrative can be seen here, although structuralism can be said to be the opposite of this1 and Lévi-Strauss took a stand against this position in an interview with P. Lamaison2. In any case, they are not here in the realm of evolutionary conjectures; on the contrary, the concept of a society of houses requires historical analysis.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-12-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Texto
Texto
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/tematicas/article/view/13-40
10.20396/tematicas.v21i42.11474
url https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/tematicas/article/view/13-40
identifier_str_mv 10.20396/tematicas.v21i42.11474
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/tematicas/article/view/13-40/6683
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2013 Marcos Lanna
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2013 Marcos Lanna
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
Brasil; Contemporáneo
Brasil; Contemporâneo
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Tematicas; v. 21 n. 42 (2013): Casas
Tematicas; Vol. 21 No. 42 (2013): Casas
Tematicas; Vol. 21 Núm. 42 (2013): Casas
2595-315X
reponame:Temáticas (Campinas. Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Temáticas (Campinas. Online)
collection Temáticas (Campinas. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Temáticas (Campinas. Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tmaticas@unicamp.br||
_version_ 1797067880950398976