Introduction to the theme
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Temáticas (Campinas. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/tematicas/article/view/13-40 |
Resumo: | Marshall Sahlins used to say that “every society is made up of houses”, playing with the concept of “society made up of houses”, by C. Lévi-Strauss, contrasting it with the common sense that every society has houses. The reference is (respectfully) playful. The joke indicates just the opposite of what the concept proposes: specifying a type of society in a large narrative. This type would be neither that of elementary structures of kinship nor that of complexes, but the concept of societies with houses would be close to that of semi-complex structures, in which matrimonial prohibitions are multiplied. This “being between” elementary and complex structures is from a logical and not a historical point of view. A great neo-evolutionary narrative can be seen here, although structuralism can be said to be the opposite of this1 and Lévi-Strauss took a stand against this position in an interview with P. Lamaison2. In any case, they are not here in the realm of evolutionary conjectures; on the contrary, the concept of a society of houses requires historical analysis. |
id |
UNICAMP-25_b9d1b9b8eb2e52bee3a81a037b9e2139 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:inpec.econtents.bc.unicamp.br:article/11474 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-25 |
network_name_str |
Temáticas (Campinas. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Introduction to the themeIntroducción al temaIntrodução à temáticaCasasHousesCasasMarshall Sahlins used to say that “every society is made up of houses”, playing with the concept of “society made up of houses”, by C. Lévi-Strauss, contrasting it with the common sense that every society has houses. The reference is (respectfully) playful. The joke indicates just the opposite of what the concept proposes: specifying a type of society in a large narrative. This type would be neither that of elementary structures of kinship nor that of complexes, but the concept of societies with houses would be close to that of semi-complex structures, in which matrimonial prohibitions are multiplied. This “being between” elementary and complex structures is from a logical and not a historical point of view. A great neo-evolutionary narrative can be seen here, although structuralism can be said to be the opposite of this1 and Lévi-Strauss took a stand against this position in an interview with P. Lamaison2. In any case, they are not here in the realm of evolutionary conjectures; on the contrary, the concept of a society of houses requires historical analysis.Marshall Sahlins dice que “toda sociedad está formada por casas”, jugando con el concepto de “sociedad formada por casas”, de C. Lévi-Strauss, contrastándolo con el sentido común de que toda sociedad tiene casas. La referencia es (respetuosamente) juguetona. El chiste indica todo lo contrario de lo que propone el concepto: especificar un tipo de sociedad en una gran narrativa. Este tipo no sería ni el de estructuras elementales de parentesco ni el de complejos, pero el concepto de sociedades con casas se acercaría al de estructuras semicomplejas, en las que se multiplican las prohibiciones matrimoniales. Este “estar entre” estructuras elementales y complejas es desde un punto de vista lógico y no histórico. Aquí se puede ver una gran narrativa neoevolucionaria, aunque se puede decir que el estructuralismo es lo contrario1 y Lévi-Strauss se opuso a esta posición en una entrevista con P. Lamaison2. En cualquier caso, no están aquí en el ámbito de las conjeturas evolutivas; por el contrario, el concepto de sociedad de casas requiere un análisis histórico.Marshall Sahlins costuma afirmar que “toda sociedade é de casas”, brincando com o conceito de “sociedade a casas”, de C. Lévi-Strauss, contrapondo-o ao senso comum segundo o qual toda sociedade tem casas. A referência é (respeitosamente) jocosa. A brincadeira indica justamente o oposto do que o conceito propõe: especificar um tipo de sociedade em uma grande narrativa. Este tipo não seria nem o das estruturas elementares de parentesco nem o das complexas, mas o conceito de sociedades a casas estaria próximo daquele de estruturas semicomplexas, nas quais se multiplicam as proibições matrimoniais. Este “estar entre” estruturas elementares e complexas é de um ponto de vista lógico e não histórico. Pode-se ver aqui uma grande narrativa neoevolucionista, ainda que o estruturalismo possa ser dito como oposto disso1 e Lévi-Strauss tenha se posicionado contra esta posição em entrevista a P. Lamaison2 . De todo modos, não estão aqui no terreno das conjecturas evolucionistas; ao contrário, o conceito de sociedade a casas exige análise histórica.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2013-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionTextoTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/tematicas/article/view/13-4010.20396/tematicas.v21i42.11474Tematicas; v. 21 n. 42 (2013): CasasTematicas; Vol. 21 No. 42 (2013): CasasTematicas; Vol. 21 Núm. 42 (2013): Casas2595-315Xreponame:Temáticas (Campinas. Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/tematicas/article/view/13-40/6683Brazil; ContemporaryBrasil; ContemporáneoBrasil; ContemporâneoCopyright (c) 2013 Marcos Lannahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLanna, Marcos2021-04-26T14:28:42Zoai:inpec.econtents.bc.unicamp.br:article/11474Revistahttps://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/tematicasPUBhttps://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/tematicas/oaitmaticas@unicamp.br||2595-315X1413-2486opendoar:2021-04-26T14:28:42Temáticas (Campinas. Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Introduction to the theme Introducción al tema Introdução à temática |
title |
Introduction to the theme |
spellingShingle |
Introduction to the theme Lanna, Marcos Casas Houses Casas |
title_short |
Introduction to the theme |
title_full |
Introduction to the theme |
title_fullStr |
Introduction to the theme |
title_full_unstemmed |
Introduction to the theme |
title_sort |
Introduction to the theme |
author |
Lanna, Marcos |
author_facet |
Lanna, Marcos |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lanna, Marcos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Casas Houses Casas |
topic |
Casas Houses Casas |
description |
Marshall Sahlins used to say that “every society is made up of houses”, playing with the concept of “society made up of houses”, by C. Lévi-Strauss, contrasting it with the common sense that every society has houses. The reference is (respectfully) playful. The joke indicates just the opposite of what the concept proposes: specifying a type of society in a large narrative. This type would be neither that of elementary structures of kinship nor that of complexes, but the concept of societies with houses would be close to that of semi-complex structures, in which matrimonial prohibitions are multiplied. This “being between” elementary and complex structures is from a logical and not a historical point of view. A great neo-evolutionary narrative can be seen here, although structuralism can be said to be the opposite of this1 and Lévi-Strauss took a stand against this position in an interview with P. Lamaison2. In any case, they are not here in the realm of evolutionary conjectures; on the contrary, the concept of a society of houses requires historical analysis. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-12-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Texto Texto info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/tematicas/article/view/13-40 10.20396/tematicas.v21i42.11474 |
url |
https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/tematicas/article/view/13-40 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.20396/tematicas.v21i42.11474 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/tematicas/article/view/13-40/6683 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2013 Marcos Lanna https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2013 Marcos Lanna https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazil; Contemporary Brasil; Contemporáneo Brasil; Contemporâneo |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Tematicas; v. 21 n. 42 (2013): Casas Tematicas; Vol. 21 No. 42 (2013): Casas Tematicas; Vol. 21 Núm. 42 (2013): Casas 2595-315X reponame:Temáticas (Campinas. Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Temáticas (Campinas. Online) |
collection |
Temáticas (Campinas. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Temáticas (Campinas. Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tmaticas@unicamp.br|| |
_version_ |
1797067880950398976 |