Foucault, Kant e o lugar simbólico da "Crítica Da Razão Pura" em "As Palavras e as Coisas"

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Candiotto, Cesar
Data de Publicação: 2009
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Kant e-prints (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/article/view/369
Resumo: This article deals with the importance that Foucault attributes to the Critic of Pure Reason, in his book, The Order of Things (1966). According to Foucault, the Critic occupies a symbolic place because of the problematic of finitude that this work inaugurates in the history of philosophy. First of all, Kant thinks about finitude from itself, and this differentiates him from Descartes, to whom this concept is referred to the infinite. Then, the Kantian finite transcendental subject is not an empirical one, in contrast to the modern analyses of finitude, which confuse the empirical with the transcendental. In this respect, the Critic does not belong to the Classical Age any longer, because it bypasses the representation. But it cannot be included in the modern analyses of finitude either, such as those of the naturalistic positivism, the dialectic, and the phenomenology. Foucault thus suggests that the Critic brings with itself the possibility of an anthropology, in the sense it is a thought that imparts a transcendental value to the empirical contents, even if it does not belong to them.
id UNICAMP-27_7623a880fb653672b715a6133fae6497
oai_identifier_str oai:www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/:article/369
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-27
network_name_str Kant e-prints (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Foucault, Kant e o lugar simbólico da "Crítica Da Razão Pura" em "As Palavras e as Coisas"KantFoucaultfinitudemananthropologyknowledgeThis article deals with the importance that Foucault attributes to the Critic of Pure Reason, in his book, The Order of Things (1966). According to Foucault, the Critic occupies a symbolic place because of the problematic of finitude that this work inaugurates in the history of philosophy. First of all, Kant thinks about finitude from itself, and this differentiates him from Descartes, to whom this concept is referred to the infinite. Then, the Kantian finite transcendental subject is not an empirical one, in contrast to the modern analyses of finitude, which confuse the empirical with the transcendental. In this respect, the Critic does not belong to the Classical Age any longer, because it bypasses the representation. But it cannot be included in the modern analyses of finitude either, such as those of the naturalistic positivism, the dialectic, and the phenomenology. Foucault thus suggests that the Critic brings with itself the possibility of an anthropology, in the sense it is a thought that imparts a transcendental value to the empirical contents, even if it does not belong to them.Centre for Logic, Epistemology, and the History of Science (CLE)2009-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/article/view/369Kant e-prints; v. 4 n. 1 (2009); 185-200Kant e-Prints; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2009); 185-2001677-163Xreponame:Kant e-prints (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:Unicampporhttps://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/article/view/369/272Copyright (c) 2015 Kant e-Printsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCandiotto, Cesar2021-10-19T15:06:59Zoai:www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/:article/369Revistahttps://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/PUBhttps://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/oaiclekant@unicamp.br||danielomarperez@hotmail.com||daniel.omar.perez@pq.cnpq.br1677-163X1677-163Xopendoar:2021-10-19T15:06:59Kant e-prints (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Foucault, Kant e o lugar simbólico da "Crítica Da Razão Pura" em "As Palavras e as Coisas"
title Foucault, Kant e o lugar simbólico da "Crítica Da Razão Pura" em "As Palavras e as Coisas"
spellingShingle Foucault, Kant e o lugar simbólico da "Crítica Da Razão Pura" em "As Palavras e as Coisas"
Candiotto, Cesar
Kant
Foucault
finitude
man
anthropology
knowledge
title_short Foucault, Kant e o lugar simbólico da "Crítica Da Razão Pura" em "As Palavras e as Coisas"
title_full Foucault, Kant e o lugar simbólico da "Crítica Da Razão Pura" em "As Palavras e as Coisas"
title_fullStr Foucault, Kant e o lugar simbólico da "Crítica Da Razão Pura" em "As Palavras e as Coisas"
title_full_unstemmed Foucault, Kant e o lugar simbólico da "Crítica Da Razão Pura" em "As Palavras e as Coisas"
title_sort Foucault, Kant e o lugar simbólico da "Crítica Da Razão Pura" em "As Palavras e as Coisas"
author Candiotto, Cesar
author_facet Candiotto, Cesar
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Candiotto, Cesar
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Kant
Foucault
finitude
man
anthropology
knowledge
topic Kant
Foucault
finitude
man
anthropology
knowledge
description This article deals with the importance that Foucault attributes to the Critic of Pure Reason, in his book, The Order of Things (1966). According to Foucault, the Critic occupies a symbolic place because of the problematic of finitude that this work inaugurates in the history of philosophy. First of all, Kant thinks about finitude from itself, and this differentiates him from Descartes, to whom this concept is referred to the infinite. Then, the Kantian finite transcendental subject is not an empirical one, in contrast to the modern analyses of finitude, which confuse the empirical with the transcendental. In this respect, the Critic does not belong to the Classical Age any longer, because it bypasses the representation. But it cannot be included in the modern analyses of finitude either, such as those of the naturalistic positivism, the dialectic, and the phenomenology. Foucault thus suggests that the Critic brings with itself the possibility of an anthropology, in the sense it is a thought that imparts a transcendental value to the empirical contents, even if it does not belong to them.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-07-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/article/view/369
url https://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/article/view/369
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cle.unicamp.br/eprints/index.php/kant-e-prints/article/view/369/272
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Kant e-Prints
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Kant e-Prints
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centre for Logic, Epistemology, and the History of Science (CLE)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centre for Logic, Epistemology, and the History of Science (CLE)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Kant e-prints; v. 4 n. 1 (2009); 185-200
Kant e-Prints; Vol. 4 No. 1 (2009); 185-200
1677-163X
reponame:Kant e-prints (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:Unicamp
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str Unicamp
institution Unicamp
reponame_str Kant e-prints (Online)
collection Kant e-prints (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Kant e-prints (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv clekant@unicamp.br||danielomarperez@hotmail.com||daniel.omar.perez@pq.cnpq.br
_version_ 1754842242941452288