Antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine in root canals instrumented with the ProTaper Universal™ System

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Câmara, Andréa Cruz
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Albuquerque, Miracy Muniz de, Aguiar, Carlos Menezes, Correia, Ana Cristina Regis de Barros
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641838
Resumo: Aim: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of 0.2%, 1%, and 2% chlorhexidine in root canals instrumented with the ProTaper Universal™ system. Methods: Fifty human mandibular premolar teeth were infected with a mixture of Candida albicans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus. The specimens were randomly divided into 5 groups with 10 root canals according to the irrigant used. All root canals were instrumented with the ProTaper Universal™ system. Assessment of the antimicrobial action of the irrigant was performed before, during, and after instrumentation. Data were analyzed statistically by Chi-squared test and the Fisher exact test at 5% significance level. Results: The 0.2% chlorhexidine solution was ineffective against all test microorganisms. The 1% chlorhexidine solution was effective in eliminating P. aeruginosa and C. albicans after the use of the F1 and F3 instruments, respectively. The 2% chlorhexidine solution was effective at killing S. aureus, P. aeruginosa and C. albicans after the use of the S1 instrument. There were statistically significant differences (p<0.05) between the concentrations of chlorhexidine and the instruments used. Conclusions: The 0.2% chlorhexidine solution in combination with rotary instrumentation was ineffective against all test microorganisms. The 1% chlorhexidine solution was ineffective against S. aureus and E. faecalis. The 2% chlorhexidine solution was not sufficient to inactivate E. faecalis.
id UNICAMP-8_3601816b2e22a61ec8d83e898a0ed826
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8641838
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-8
network_name_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine in root canals instrumented with the ProTaper Universal™ SystemAntimicrobial activityChlorhexidineProTaper Universal™Root canal irrigantRotary instrumentationOdontologyAim: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of 0.2%, 1%, and 2% chlorhexidine in root canals instrumented with the ProTaper Universal™ system. Methods: Fifty human mandibular premolar teeth were infected with a mixture of Candida albicans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus. The specimens were randomly divided into 5 groups with 10 root canals according to the irrigant used. All root canals were instrumented with the ProTaper Universal™ system. Assessment of the antimicrobial action of the irrigant was performed before, during, and after instrumentation. Data were analyzed statistically by Chi-squared test and the Fisher exact test at 5% significance level. Results: The 0.2% chlorhexidine solution was ineffective against all test microorganisms. The 1% chlorhexidine solution was effective in eliminating P. aeruginosa and C. albicans after the use of the F1 and F3 instruments, respectively. The 2% chlorhexidine solution was effective at killing S. aureus, P. aeruginosa and C. albicans after the use of the S1 instrument. There were statistically significant differences (p<0.05) between the concentrations of chlorhexidine and the instruments used. Conclusions: The 0.2% chlorhexidine solution in combination with rotary instrumentation was ineffective against all test microorganisms. The 1% chlorhexidine solution was ineffective against S. aureus and E. faecalis. The 2% chlorhexidine solution was not sufficient to inactivate E. faecalis.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2015-11-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/864183810.20396/bjos.v9i3.8641838Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 9 n. 3 (2010): Jul./Sep.; 402-409Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 9 No. 3 (2010): Jul./Sep.; 402-4091677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641838/9337Câmara, Andréa CruzAlbuquerque, Miracy Muniz deAguiar, Carlos MenezesCorreia, Ana Cristina Regis de Barrosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-02-25T09:12:39Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8641838Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2016-02-25T09:12:39Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine in root canals instrumented with the ProTaper Universal™ System
title Antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine in root canals instrumented with the ProTaper Universal™ System
spellingShingle Antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine in root canals instrumented with the ProTaper Universal™ System
Câmara, Andréa Cruz
Antimicrobial activity
Chlorhexidine
ProTaper Universal™
Root canal irrigant
Rotary instrumentation
Odontology
title_short Antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine in root canals instrumented with the ProTaper Universal™ System
title_full Antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine in root canals instrumented with the ProTaper Universal™ System
title_fullStr Antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine in root canals instrumented with the ProTaper Universal™ System
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine in root canals instrumented with the ProTaper Universal™ System
title_sort Antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine in root canals instrumented with the ProTaper Universal™ System
author Câmara, Andréa Cruz
author_facet Câmara, Andréa Cruz
Albuquerque, Miracy Muniz de
Aguiar, Carlos Menezes
Correia, Ana Cristina Regis de Barros
author_role author
author2 Albuquerque, Miracy Muniz de
Aguiar, Carlos Menezes
Correia, Ana Cristina Regis de Barros
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Câmara, Andréa Cruz
Albuquerque, Miracy Muniz de
Aguiar, Carlos Menezes
Correia, Ana Cristina Regis de Barros
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Antimicrobial activity
Chlorhexidine
ProTaper Universal™
Root canal irrigant
Rotary instrumentation
Odontology
topic Antimicrobial activity
Chlorhexidine
ProTaper Universal™
Root canal irrigant
Rotary instrumentation
Odontology
description Aim: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of 0.2%, 1%, and 2% chlorhexidine in root canals instrumented with the ProTaper Universal™ system. Methods: Fifty human mandibular premolar teeth were infected with a mixture of Candida albicans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus. The specimens were randomly divided into 5 groups with 10 root canals according to the irrigant used. All root canals were instrumented with the ProTaper Universal™ system. Assessment of the antimicrobial action of the irrigant was performed before, during, and after instrumentation. Data were analyzed statistically by Chi-squared test and the Fisher exact test at 5% significance level. Results: The 0.2% chlorhexidine solution was ineffective against all test microorganisms. The 1% chlorhexidine solution was effective in eliminating P. aeruginosa and C. albicans after the use of the F1 and F3 instruments, respectively. The 2% chlorhexidine solution was effective at killing S. aureus, P. aeruginosa and C. albicans after the use of the S1 instrument. There were statistically significant differences (p<0.05) between the concentrations of chlorhexidine and the instruments used. Conclusions: The 0.2% chlorhexidine solution in combination with rotary instrumentation was ineffective against all test microorganisms. The 1% chlorhexidine solution was ineffective against S. aureus and E. faecalis. The 2% chlorhexidine solution was not sufficient to inactivate E. faecalis.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-11-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641838
10.20396/bjos.v9i3.8641838
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641838
identifier_str_mv 10.20396/bjos.v9i3.8641838
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641838/9337
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 9 n. 3 (2010): Jul./Sep.; 402-409
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 9 No. 3 (2010): Jul./Sep.; 402-409
1677-3225
reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
collection Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br
_version_ 1800216400037412864