Analysis of the biocompatibility of a biocelulose and a poly L- lactic acid membrane

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Doval Neto, José
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Marques, Rodrigo Fernando Costa, Motta, Adriana Cristina, Duek, Eliana Aparecida de Rezende, Oliveira, Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes de, Marcantonio, Cláudio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8670616
Resumo: The use of selective barriers as resorbable membranes has become a routine clinical procedure for guided bone regeneration. Therefore, the production of membranes with a low inflammatory potential during their resorption process has become the goal of a considerable number of researches. Aim: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the biocompatibility of poly (L- lactic acid) (PLLA) and biocelulose membranes (BC) inserted in the subcutaneous tissue on the dorsum of rats. Methods: Fifteen animals underwent surgical procedures for the insertion of 4 types of membranes: COL (Collagen membrane) – Control Group; BC (Biocellulose membrane); BCAg (Biocellulose membrane impregnated with Silver); PLLA (Poly (L-lactic acid) membrane). All membrane types were inserted into each animal. Animals were euthanized after 3, 7, and 15 days of the surgical procedure. Descriptive histological analyses were carried out to investigate host tissue reaction to membrane presence by assessing the anti-inflammatory process composition associated with the membrane resorption and the presence of foreign-body reaction or encapsulation. Results: The BC membranes showed a higher degree of inflammation and poor pattern of integration with the surrounding tissues than the PLLA and COL membranes. Conclusion: The PLLA and COL membranes present better biocompatibility than the BC membranes.
id UNICAMP-8_4ad9ff2dd4ffec1df8b9d4d73d8d23be
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8670616
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-8
network_name_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Analysis of the biocompatibility of a biocelulose and a poly L- lactic acid membraneBiocompatible materialsInflammationMembranesCelulosePolyestersThe use of selective barriers as resorbable membranes has become a routine clinical procedure for guided bone regeneration. Therefore, the production of membranes with a low inflammatory potential during their resorption process has become the goal of a considerable number of researches. Aim: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the biocompatibility of poly (L- lactic acid) (PLLA) and biocelulose membranes (BC) inserted in the subcutaneous tissue on the dorsum of rats. Methods: Fifteen animals underwent surgical procedures for the insertion of 4 types of membranes: COL (Collagen membrane) – Control Group; BC (Biocellulose membrane); BCAg (Biocellulose membrane impregnated with Silver); PLLA (Poly (L-lactic acid) membrane). All membrane types were inserted into each animal. Animals were euthanized after 3, 7, and 15 days of the surgical procedure. Descriptive histological analyses were carried out to investigate host tissue reaction to membrane presence by assessing the anti-inflammatory process composition associated with the membrane resorption and the presence of foreign-body reaction or encapsulation. Results: The BC membranes showed a higher degree of inflammation and poor pattern of integration with the surrounding tissues than the PLLA and COL membranes. Conclusion: The PLLA and COL membranes present better biocompatibility than the BC membranes.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2022-08-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/867061610.20396/bjos.v21i00.8670616Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 21 (2022): Continuous Publication; e220616Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 21 (2022): Continuous Publication; e2206161677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8670616/29880Brazil; ContemporaryCopyright (c) 2021 José Doval Neto, Rodrigo Fernando Costa Marques, Adriana Cristina Motta, Eliana Aparecida de Rezende Duek, Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes de Oliveira, Cláudio Marcantoniohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDoval Neto, José Marques, Rodrigo Fernando Costa Motta, Adriana Cristina Duek, Eliana Aparecida de Rezende Oliveira, Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes de Marcantonio, Cláudio 2022-08-23T12:05:17Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8670616Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2022-08-23T12:05:17Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Analysis of the biocompatibility of a biocelulose and a poly L- lactic acid membrane
title Analysis of the biocompatibility of a biocelulose and a poly L- lactic acid membrane
spellingShingle Analysis of the biocompatibility of a biocelulose and a poly L- lactic acid membrane
Doval Neto, José
Biocompatible materials
Inflammation
Membranes
Celulose
Polyesters
title_short Analysis of the biocompatibility of a biocelulose and a poly L- lactic acid membrane
title_full Analysis of the biocompatibility of a biocelulose and a poly L- lactic acid membrane
title_fullStr Analysis of the biocompatibility of a biocelulose and a poly L- lactic acid membrane
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the biocompatibility of a biocelulose and a poly L- lactic acid membrane
title_sort Analysis of the biocompatibility of a biocelulose and a poly L- lactic acid membrane
author Doval Neto, José
author_facet Doval Neto, José
Marques, Rodrigo Fernando Costa
Motta, Adriana Cristina
Duek, Eliana Aparecida de Rezende
Oliveira, Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes de
Marcantonio, Cláudio
author_role author
author2 Marques, Rodrigo Fernando Costa
Motta, Adriana Cristina
Duek, Eliana Aparecida de Rezende
Oliveira, Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes de
Marcantonio, Cláudio
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Doval Neto, José
Marques, Rodrigo Fernando Costa
Motta, Adriana Cristina
Duek, Eliana Aparecida de Rezende
Oliveira, Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes de
Marcantonio, Cláudio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Biocompatible materials
Inflammation
Membranes
Celulose
Polyesters
topic Biocompatible materials
Inflammation
Membranes
Celulose
Polyesters
description The use of selective barriers as resorbable membranes has become a routine clinical procedure for guided bone regeneration. Therefore, the production of membranes with a low inflammatory potential during their resorption process has become the goal of a considerable number of researches. Aim: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the biocompatibility of poly (L- lactic acid) (PLLA) and biocelulose membranes (BC) inserted in the subcutaneous tissue on the dorsum of rats. Methods: Fifteen animals underwent surgical procedures for the insertion of 4 types of membranes: COL (Collagen membrane) – Control Group; BC (Biocellulose membrane); BCAg (Biocellulose membrane impregnated with Silver); PLLA (Poly (L-lactic acid) membrane). All membrane types were inserted into each animal. Animals were euthanized after 3, 7, and 15 days of the surgical procedure. Descriptive histological analyses were carried out to investigate host tissue reaction to membrane presence by assessing the anti-inflammatory process composition associated with the membrane resorption and the presence of foreign-body reaction or encapsulation. Results: The BC membranes showed a higher degree of inflammation and poor pattern of integration with the surrounding tissues than the PLLA and COL membranes. Conclusion: The PLLA and COL membranes present better biocompatibility than the BC membranes.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-08-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8670616
10.20396/bjos.v21i00.8670616
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8670616
identifier_str_mv 10.20396/bjos.v21i00.8670616
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8670616/29880
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Brazil; Contemporary
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 21 (2022): Continuous Publication; e220616
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 21 (2022): Continuous Publication; e220616
1677-3225
reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
collection Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br
_version_ 1800216404174045184