Is bleeding on probing a differential diagnosis between periimplant health and disease?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Casado, Priscila Ladeira
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Villas-Bôas, Ricardo, Silva, Luana Cristine Leão da, Bonato, Letícia Ladeira, Granjeiro, José Mauro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641067
Resumo: As far as the periimplant anatomy is considered, the question raised is whether or not healthy periimplant tissues present bleeding on probing (BOP). Aim: To assess if the criterion BOP is strictly related to periimplant disease (PID). Methods: 134 patients were included in this study. All periimplant regions were clinically and radiographically evaluated. Patients were assigned to 3 groups based on radiographic and clinical aspects in the periimplant region: Group A (healthysites) - no signs of mucosal inflammation or bone loss; Group B (mucositis) - red and swollen mucosa, but no radiographic bone loss; Group C (periimplantitis) - radiographically confirmed pathological bone loss. After this classification, all periimplant sulci were probed at 4 sites (mesial, distal, buccal, lingual/palatal). Patients’ mean age was 51.7±12.4 years, 77 women and 57 men, with a total of 486 osseointegrated endosseous implants. Results: Groups A and C showed significant difference in age and implant region distribution (p=0.009 and p=0.008, respectively). After initial clinical and radiographic diagnosis of periimplant status, 33 (20.1%) regions showed BOP in group A. All regions in Group B presented BOP. In Group C, 41 (19.9%) regions showed no BOP. All groups differed significantly considering BOP as diagnosis parameter (p<0.0001). Conclusions: BOP was always present in inflamed mucosa, but it was not always absent in healthy mucosa. Not all periimplantitis regions showed BOP. Clinical and radiographic aspects must always be considered together for diagnosis of PID, even if BOP is absent.
id UNICAMP-8_79eb53488cb2e4ed4070225e8ecd7fc5
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8641067
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-8
network_name_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Is bleeding on probing a differential diagnosis between periimplant health and disease?InflammationPeriimplantitisDiagnosisOdontologiaAs far as the periimplant anatomy is considered, the question raised is whether or not healthy periimplant tissues present bleeding on probing (BOP). Aim: To assess if the criterion BOP is strictly related to periimplant disease (PID). Methods: 134 patients were included in this study. All periimplant regions were clinically and radiographically evaluated. Patients were assigned to 3 groups based on radiographic and clinical aspects in the periimplant region: Group A (healthysites) - no signs of mucosal inflammation or bone loss; Group B (mucositis) - red and swollen mucosa, but no radiographic bone loss; Group C (periimplantitis) - radiographically confirmed pathological bone loss. After this classification, all periimplant sulci were probed at 4 sites (mesial, distal, buccal, lingual/palatal). Patients’ mean age was 51.7±12.4 years, 77 women and 57 men, with a total of 486 osseointegrated endosseous implants. Results: Groups A and C showed significant difference in age and implant region distribution (p=0.009 and p=0.008, respectively). After initial clinical and radiographic diagnosis of periimplant status, 33 (20.1%) regions showed BOP in group A. All regions in Group B presented BOP. In Group C, 41 (19.9%) regions showed no BOP. All groups differed significantly considering BOP as diagnosis parameter (p<0.0001). Conclusions: BOP was always present in inflamed mucosa, but it was not always absent in healthy mucosa. Not all periimplantitis regions showed BOP. Clinical and radiographic aspects must always be considered together for diagnosis of PID, even if BOP is absent.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2015-10-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641067Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 12 n. 2 (2013): Abr./Jun.; 95-99Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 12 No. 2 (2013): Abr./Jun.; 95-991677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641067/8580Copyright (c) 2015 Priscila Ladeira Casado, Ricardo Villas-Bôas, Luana Cristine Leão da Silva, Letícia Ladeira Bonato, José Mauro Granjeirohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCasado, Priscila LadeiraVillas-Bôas, RicardoSilva, Luana Cristine Leão daBonato, Letícia LadeiraGranjeiro, José Mauro2023-09-29T12:47:18Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8641067Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2023-09-29T12:47:18Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is bleeding on probing a differential diagnosis between periimplant health and disease?
title Is bleeding on probing a differential diagnosis between periimplant health and disease?
spellingShingle Is bleeding on probing a differential diagnosis between periimplant health and disease?
Casado, Priscila Ladeira
Inflammation
Periimplantitis
Diagnosis
Odontologia
title_short Is bleeding on probing a differential diagnosis between periimplant health and disease?
title_full Is bleeding on probing a differential diagnosis between periimplant health and disease?
title_fullStr Is bleeding on probing a differential diagnosis between periimplant health and disease?
title_full_unstemmed Is bleeding on probing a differential diagnosis between periimplant health and disease?
title_sort Is bleeding on probing a differential diagnosis between periimplant health and disease?
author Casado, Priscila Ladeira
author_facet Casado, Priscila Ladeira
Villas-Bôas, Ricardo
Silva, Luana Cristine Leão da
Bonato, Letícia Ladeira
Granjeiro, José Mauro
author_role author
author2 Villas-Bôas, Ricardo
Silva, Luana Cristine Leão da
Bonato, Letícia Ladeira
Granjeiro, José Mauro
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Casado, Priscila Ladeira
Villas-Bôas, Ricardo
Silva, Luana Cristine Leão da
Bonato, Letícia Ladeira
Granjeiro, José Mauro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Inflammation
Periimplantitis
Diagnosis
Odontologia
topic Inflammation
Periimplantitis
Diagnosis
Odontologia
description As far as the periimplant anatomy is considered, the question raised is whether or not healthy periimplant tissues present bleeding on probing (BOP). Aim: To assess if the criterion BOP is strictly related to periimplant disease (PID). Methods: 134 patients were included in this study. All periimplant regions were clinically and radiographically evaluated. Patients were assigned to 3 groups based on radiographic and clinical aspects in the periimplant region: Group A (healthysites) - no signs of mucosal inflammation or bone loss; Group B (mucositis) - red and swollen mucosa, but no radiographic bone loss; Group C (periimplantitis) - radiographically confirmed pathological bone loss. After this classification, all periimplant sulci were probed at 4 sites (mesial, distal, buccal, lingual/palatal). Patients’ mean age was 51.7±12.4 years, 77 women and 57 men, with a total of 486 osseointegrated endosseous implants. Results: Groups A and C showed significant difference in age and implant region distribution (p=0.009 and p=0.008, respectively). After initial clinical and radiographic diagnosis of periimplant status, 33 (20.1%) regions showed BOP in group A. All regions in Group B presented BOP. In Group C, 41 (19.9%) regions showed no BOP. All groups differed significantly considering BOP as diagnosis parameter (p<0.0001). Conclusions: BOP was always present in inflamed mucosa, but it was not always absent in healthy mucosa. Not all periimplantitis regions showed BOP. Clinical and radiographic aspects must always be considered together for diagnosis of PID, even if BOP is absent.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-10-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641067
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641067
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641067/8580
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 12 n. 2 (2013): Abr./Jun.; 95-99
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 12 No. 2 (2013): Abr./Jun.; 95-99
1677-3225
reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
collection Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br
_version_ 1800216398254833664