Photoelastic and finite element stress analysis reliability for implant-supported system stress investigation
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8652941 |
Resumo: | Aim: To compare the reliability between photoelastic and finite element (FE) analyses by evaluating the effect of different marginal misfit levels on the stresses generated on two different implant-supported systems using conventional and short implants. Methods: Two photoelastic models were obtained: model C with two conventional implants (4.1×11 mm); and model S with a conventional and a short implant (5×6 mm). Three-unit CoCr frameworks were fabricated simulating a superior first pre-molar (P) to first molar (M) fixed dental prosthesis. Different levels of misfit (µm) were selected based on the misfit average of 10 frameworks obtained by the single-screw test protocol: low (<20), medium (>20 and <40) and high (>40). Stress levels and distribution were measured by photoelastic analysis. A similar situation of the in vitro assay was designed and simulated by the in silico analysis. Maximum and minimum principal strain were recorded numerically and color-coded for the models. Von Mises Stress was obtained for the metallic components. Results: Photoelasticity and FE analyses showed similar tendency where the increase of misfit generates higher stress levels despite of the implant design. The short implant showed lower von Mises stress values; however, it presented stresses around its full length for the in vitro and in silico analysis. Also, model S showed higher µstrain values for all simulated misfit levels. The type of implant did not affect the stresses around pillar P. Conclusions: Photoelasticity and FEA are reliable methodologies presenting similarity for the investigation of the biomechanical behavior of implant-supported rehabilitations. |
id |
UNICAMP-8_b22e6a12af0fbfda3b166fdf7891b1cf |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8652941 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-8 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Photoelastic and finite element stress analysis reliability for implant-supported system stress investigationBiomechanical Phenomena. Dental Implants. Optical Phenomena. Finite Element Analysis.Aim: To compare the reliability between photoelastic and finite element (FE) analyses by evaluating the effect of different marginal misfit levels on the stresses generated on two different implant-supported systems using conventional and short implants. Methods: Two photoelastic models were obtained: model C with two conventional implants (4.1×11 mm); and model S with a conventional and a short implant (5×6 mm). Three-unit CoCr frameworks were fabricated simulating a superior first pre-molar (P) to first molar (M) fixed dental prosthesis. Different levels of misfit (µm) were selected based on the misfit average of 10 frameworks obtained by the single-screw test protocol: low (<20), medium (>20 and <40) and high (>40). Stress levels and distribution were measured by photoelastic analysis. A similar situation of the in vitro assay was designed and simulated by the in silico analysis. Maximum and minimum principal strain were recorded numerically and color-coded for the models. Von Mises Stress was obtained for the metallic components. Results: Photoelasticity and FE analyses showed similar tendency where the increase of misfit generates higher stress levels despite of the implant design. The short implant showed lower von Mises stress values; however, it presented stresses around its full length for the in vitro and in silico analysis. Also, model S showed higher µstrain values for all simulated misfit levels. The type of implant did not affect the stresses around pillar P. Conclusions: Photoelasticity and FEA are reliable methodologies presenting similarity for the investigation of the biomechanical behavior of implant-supported rehabilitations.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2018-07-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionOriginal articleapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/865294110.20396/bjos.v17i0.8652941Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 17 (2018): Continuous Publication; e181097Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 17 (2018): Continuous Publication; e1810971677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8652941/18446Presotto, Anna Gabriella CamachoBhering, Cláudia Lopes BrilhanteCaldas, Ricardo ArminiConsani, Rafael Leonardo XediekBarão, Valentim Adelino RicardoMesquita, Marcelo Ferrazinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-12-22T01:34:08Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8652941Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2020-12-22T01:34:08Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Photoelastic and finite element stress analysis reliability for implant-supported system stress investigation |
title |
Photoelastic and finite element stress analysis reliability for implant-supported system stress investigation |
spellingShingle |
Photoelastic and finite element stress analysis reliability for implant-supported system stress investigation Presotto, Anna Gabriella Camacho Biomechanical Phenomena. Dental Implants. Optical Phenomena. Finite Element Analysis. |
title_short |
Photoelastic and finite element stress analysis reliability for implant-supported system stress investigation |
title_full |
Photoelastic and finite element stress analysis reliability for implant-supported system stress investigation |
title_fullStr |
Photoelastic and finite element stress analysis reliability for implant-supported system stress investigation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Photoelastic and finite element stress analysis reliability for implant-supported system stress investigation |
title_sort |
Photoelastic and finite element stress analysis reliability for implant-supported system stress investigation |
author |
Presotto, Anna Gabriella Camacho |
author_facet |
Presotto, Anna Gabriella Camacho Bhering, Cláudia Lopes Brilhante Caldas, Ricardo Armini Consani, Rafael Leonardo Xediek Barão, Valentim Adelino Ricardo Mesquita, Marcelo Ferraz |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bhering, Cláudia Lopes Brilhante Caldas, Ricardo Armini Consani, Rafael Leonardo Xediek Barão, Valentim Adelino Ricardo Mesquita, Marcelo Ferraz |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Presotto, Anna Gabriella Camacho Bhering, Cláudia Lopes Brilhante Caldas, Ricardo Armini Consani, Rafael Leonardo Xediek Barão, Valentim Adelino Ricardo Mesquita, Marcelo Ferraz |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Biomechanical Phenomena. Dental Implants. Optical Phenomena. Finite Element Analysis. |
topic |
Biomechanical Phenomena. Dental Implants. Optical Phenomena. Finite Element Analysis. |
description |
Aim: To compare the reliability between photoelastic and finite element (FE) analyses by evaluating the effect of different marginal misfit levels on the stresses generated on two different implant-supported systems using conventional and short implants. Methods: Two photoelastic models were obtained: model C with two conventional implants (4.1×11 mm); and model S with a conventional and a short implant (5×6 mm). Three-unit CoCr frameworks were fabricated simulating a superior first pre-molar (P) to first molar (M) fixed dental prosthesis. Different levels of misfit (µm) were selected based on the misfit average of 10 frameworks obtained by the single-screw test protocol: low (<20), medium (>20 and <40) and high (>40). Stress levels and distribution were measured by photoelastic analysis. A similar situation of the in vitro assay was designed and simulated by the in silico analysis. Maximum and minimum principal strain were recorded numerically and color-coded for the models. Von Mises Stress was obtained for the metallic components. Results: Photoelasticity and FE analyses showed similar tendency where the increase of misfit generates higher stress levels despite of the implant design. The short implant showed lower von Mises stress values; however, it presented stresses around its full length for the in vitro and in silico analysis. Also, model S showed higher µstrain values for all simulated misfit levels. The type of implant did not affect the stresses around pillar P. Conclusions: Photoelasticity and FEA are reliable methodologies presenting similarity for the investigation of the biomechanical behavior of implant-supported rehabilitations. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-07-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Original article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8652941 10.20396/bjos.v17i0.8652941 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8652941 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.20396/bjos.v17i0.8652941 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8652941/18446 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 17 (2018): Continuous Publication; e181097 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 17 (2018): Continuous Publication; e181097 1677-3225 reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
collection |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1800216402294996992 |