Dentin bond strength evaluation between a conventional and universal adhesive using etch-and-rinse strategy
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
DOI: | 10.20396/bjos.v20i00.8659342 |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8659342 |
Resumo: | Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) and the characteristics of the adhesive interface of Scotchbond Universal - SU – etch-and-rise mode (3M ESPE) and Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose - MP (3M ESPE) to dentin over time. Methods: Class I cavity preparations were performed in 60 human molars that were randomly divided according to the dentin bonding system (DBS) used (n=30): (1) Acid conditioning + SU and (2) Acid conditioning + MP. For bonding strength (BS) analysis, 30 teeth (n = 15) were sectioned into sticks and submitted to the microtensile test in a universal testing machine after 24 hours and 12 months. The adhesive interface of the others 30 teeth was analyzed in a confocal microscope after 24 hours and 12 months. The data of μTBS were analyzed by two-way repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD (α = 0.05). Results: SU presented the lowest DBS compared to MP (p=0.000). Time did not influenced DBS for both adhesive systems (p=0.177). Confocal microscopy analysis showed no cracks between both adhesive systems tested. Conclusion: The results indicate that MP - μTBS showed a better performance compared to SU in total-etch mode. |
id |
UNICAMP-8_d66424f132d166f73e5456a1371eb90e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8659342 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-8 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
spelling |
Dentin bond strength evaluation between a conventional and universal adhesive using etch-and-rinse strategy Dentin-bonding agentsDentinMethacrylatesMicroscopy, confocalAim: The aim of this study was to compare the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) and the characteristics of the adhesive interface of Scotchbond Universal - SU – etch-and-rise mode (3M ESPE) and Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose - MP (3M ESPE) to dentin over time. Methods: Class I cavity preparations were performed in 60 human molars that were randomly divided according to the dentin bonding system (DBS) used (n=30): (1) Acid conditioning + SU and (2) Acid conditioning + MP. For bonding strength (BS) analysis, 30 teeth (n = 15) were sectioned into sticks and submitted to the microtensile test in a universal testing machine after 24 hours and 12 months. The adhesive interface of the others 30 teeth was analyzed in a confocal microscope after 24 hours and 12 months. The data of μTBS were analyzed by two-way repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD (α = 0.05). Results: SU presented the lowest DBS compared to MP (p=0.000). Time did not influenced DBS for both adhesive systems (p=0.177). Confocal microscopy analysis showed no cracks between both adhesive systems tested. Conclusion: The results indicate that MP - μTBS showed a better performance compared to SU in total-etch mode.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2021-02-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/865934210.20396/bjos.v20i00.8659342Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 20 (2021): Continuous Publication; e219342Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 20 (2021): Continuous Publication; e2193421677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8659342/25905Brazil; ContemporanyCopyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Oral Scienceshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoreira de Freitas Guimarães, Genine Modena , Karin Cristina da Silva Sugio , Carolina Yoshi Campos de Luccas Bueno , Tamires Silvério Agulhari , Maria AngélicaAtta , Maria Teresa 2021-02-09T13:08:46Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8659342Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2021-02-09T13:08:46Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Dentin bond strength evaluation between a conventional and universal adhesive using etch-and-rinse strategy |
title |
Dentin bond strength evaluation between a conventional and universal adhesive using etch-and-rinse strategy |
spellingShingle |
Dentin bond strength evaluation between a conventional and universal adhesive using etch-and-rinse strategy Dentin bond strength evaluation between a conventional and universal adhesive using etch-and-rinse strategy Moreira de Freitas Guimarães, Genine Dentin-bonding agents Dentin Methacrylates Microscopy, confocal Moreira de Freitas Guimarães, Genine Dentin-bonding agents Dentin Methacrylates Microscopy, confocal |
title_short |
Dentin bond strength evaluation between a conventional and universal adhesive using etch-and-rinse strategy |
title_full |
Dentin bond strength evaluation between a conventional and universal adhesive using etch-and-rinse strategy |
title_fullStr |
Dentin bond strength evaluation between a conventional and universal adhesive using etch-and-rinse strategy Dentin bond strength evaluation between a conventional and universal adhesive using etch-and-rinse strategy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dentin bond strength evaluation between a conventional and universal adhesive using etch-and-rinse strategy Dentin bond strength evaluation between a conventional and universal adhesive using etch-and-rinse strategy |
title_sort |
Dentin bond strength evaluation between a conventional and universal adhesive using etch-and-rinse strategy |
author |
Moreira de Freitas Guimarães, Genine |
author_facet |
Moreira de Freitas Guimarães, Genine Moreira de Freitas Guimarães, Genine Modena , Karin Cristina da Silva Sugio , Carolina Yoshi Campos de Luccas Bueno , Tamires Silvério Agulhari , Maria Angélica Atta , Maria Teresa Modena , Karin Cristina da Silva Sugio , Carolina Yoshi Campos de Luccas Bueno , Tamires Silvério Agulhari , Maria Angélica Atta , Maria Teresa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Modena , Karin Cristina da Silva Sugio , Carolina Yoshi Campos de Luccas Bueno , Tamires Silvério Agulhari , Maria Angélica Atta , Maria Teresa |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Moreira de Freitas Guimarães, Genine Modena , Karin Cristina da Silva Sugio , Carolina Yoshi Campos de Luccas Bueno , Tamires Silvério Agulhari , Maria Angélica Atta , Maria Teresa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dentin-bonding agents Dentin Methacrylates Microscopy, confocal |
topic |
Dentin-bonding agents Dentin Methacrylates Microscopy, confocal |
description |
Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) and the characteristics of the adhesive interface of Scotchbond Universal - SU – etch-and-rise mode (3M ESPE) and Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose - MP (3M ESPE) to dentin over time. Methods: Class I cavity preparations were performed in 60 human molars that were randomly divided according to the dentin bonding system (DBS) used (n=30): (1) Acid conditioning + SU and (2) Acid conditioning + MP. For bonding strength (BS) analysis, 30 teeth (n = 15) were sectioned into sticks and submitted to the microtensile test in a universal testing machine after 24 hours and 12 months. The adhesive interface of the others 30 teeth was analyzed in a confocal microscope after 24 hours and 12 months. The data of μTBS were analyzed by two-way repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD (α = 0.05). Results: SU presented the lowest DBS compared to MP (p=0.000). Time did not influenced DBS for both adhesive systems (p=0.177). Confocal microscopy analysis showed no cracks between both adhesive systems tested. Conclusion: The results indicate that MP - μTBS showed a better performance compared to SU in total-etch mode. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-02-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8659342 10.20396/bjos.v20i00.8659342 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8659342 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.20396/bjos.v20i00.8659342 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8659342/25905 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazil; Contemporany |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 20 (2021): Continuous Publication; e219342 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 20 (2021): Continuous Publication; e219342 1677-3225 reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
collection |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1822179083418599424 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.20396/bjos.v20i00.8659342 |