Histometric analysis of alveolar bone regeneration with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) and latex membranes

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Molina, Gustavo Otoboni
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Oliveira, Marcelo Tomás de, Buss, Leonardo, Peruchi, João Davi Faraco, Pereira, Jefferson Ricardo, Ghizoni, Janaina Salomon
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641025
Resumo: Aim: To investigate the amount of connective tissue migrated into the extraction socket using EPTFE and latex membranes. Methods: Seventeen rats were selected and randomly divided into 3 groups: e-PTFE membrane (n = 6), Latex membrane (n = 6) and Control (no membrane, n=5). After extraction of the maxillary right incisor, the animals of the test groups were subjected to alveolar guided bone regeneration (GBR) surgery and received an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) and a latex membrane, respectively. Thirty days after surgery, the animals were killed and histometric analysis was done to evaluate the migration of connective tissue. Data were analyzed statistically by one-way ANOVA and multiple-comparison Tukey’s test at 5% significance level. Results: There was statistically significant difference between groups ePTFE and Latex (p=0.001), and between groups e-PTFE and Control (p=0.012), but no significant difference was found between groups Latex and Control (p=0.416). Conclusions: The ePTFE membrane showed better results and appeared more adequate for GBR therapy, forming a barrier to prevent the migration of connective tissue into the extraction socket. The latex membrane, on the other hand, did not show benefits over the control group.
id UNICAMP-8_d99e25f226b0b39dc90ff4698501b235
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8641025
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-8
network_name_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Histometric analysis of alveolar bone regeneration with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) and latex membranesBone regenerationMembranesOral surgeryTooth extractionOdontologiaAim: To investigate the amount of connective tissue migrated into the extraction socket using EPTFE and latex membranes. Methods: Seventeen rats were selected and randomly divided into 3 groups: e-PTFE membrane (n = 6), Latex membrane (n = 6) and Control (no membrane, n=5). After extraction of the maxillary right incisor, the animals of the test groups were subjected to alveolar guided bone regeneration (GBR) surgery and received an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) and a latex membrane, respectively. Thirty days after surgery, the animals were killed and histometric analysis was done to evaluate the migration of connective tissue. Data were analyzed statistically by one-way ANOVA and multiple-comparison Tukey’s test at 5% significance level. Results: There was statistically significant difference between groups ePTFE and Latex (p=0.001), and between groups e-PTFE and Control (p=0.012), but no significant difference was found between groups Latex and Control (p=0.416). Conclusions: The ePTFE membrane showed better results and appeared more adequate for GBR therapy, forming a barrier to prevent the migration of connective tissue into the extraction socket. The latex membrane, on the other hand, did not show benefits over the control group.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2015-10-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641025Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 12 n. 3 (2013): Jul./Set.; 184-188Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 12 No. 3 (2013): Jul./Set.; 184-1881677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641025/8541Copyright (c) 2015 Gustavo Otoboni Molina, Marcelo Tomás de Oliveira, Leonardo Buss, João Davi Faraco Peruchi, Jefferson Ricardo Pereira, Janaina Salomon Ghizonihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMolina, Gustavo OtoboniOliveira, Marcelo Tomás deBuss, LeonardoPeruchi, João Davi FaracoPereira, Jefferson RicardoGhizoni, Janaina Salomon2023-09-29T14:03:31Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8641025Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2023-09-29T14:03:31Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Histometric analysis of alveolar bone regeneration with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) and latex membranes
title Histometric analysis of alveolar bone regeneration with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) and latex membranes
spellingShingle Histometric analysis of alveolar bone regeneration with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) and latex membranes
Molina, Gustavo Otoboni
Bone regeneration
Membranes
Oral surgery
Tooth extraction
Odontologia
title_short Histometric analysis of alveolar bone regeneration with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) and latex membranes
title_full Histometric analysis of alveolar bone regeneration with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) and latex membranes
title_fullStr Histometric analysis of alveolar bone regeneration with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) and latex membranes
title_full_unstemmed Histometric analysis of alveolar bone regeneration with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) and latex membranes
title_sort Histometric analysis of alveolar bone regeneration with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) and latex membranes
author Molina, Gustavo Otoboni
author_facet Molina, Gustavo Otoboni
Oliveira, Marcelo Tomás de
Buss, Leonardo
Peruchi, João Davi Faraco
Pereira, Jefferson Ricardo
Ghizoni, Janaina Salomon
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, Marcelo Tomás de
Buss, Leonardo
Peruchi, João Davi Faraco
Pereira, Jefferson Ricardo
Ghizoni, Janaina Salomon
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Molina, Gustavo Otoboni
Oliveira, Marcelo Tomás de
Buss, Leonardo
Peruchi, João Davi Faraco
Pereira, Jefferson Ricardo
Ghizoni, Janaina Salomon
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bone regeneration
Membranes
Oral surgery
Tooth extraction
Odontologia
topic Bone regeneration
Membranes
Oral surgery
Tooth extraction
Odontologia
description Aim: To investigate the amount of connective tissue migrated into the extraction socket using EPTFE and latex membranes. Methods: Seventeen rats were selected and randomly divided into 3 groups: e-PTFE membrane (n = 6), Latex membrane (n = 6) and Control (no membrane, n=5). After extraction of the maxillary right incisor, the animals of the test groups were subjected to alveolar guided bone regeneration (GBR) surgery and received an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) and a latex membrane, respectively. Thirty days after surgery, the animals were killed and histometric analysis was done to evaluate the migration of connective tissue. Data were analyzed statistically by one-way ANOVA and multiple-comparison Tukey’s test at 5% significance level. Results: There was statistically significant difference between groups ePTFE and Latex (p=0.001), and between groups e-PTFE and Control (p=0.012), but no significant difference was found between groups Latex and Control (p=0.416). Conclusions: The ePTFE membrane showed better results and appeared more adequate for GBR therapy, forming a barrier to prevent the migration of connective tissue into the extraction socket. The latex membrane, on the other hand, did not show benefits over the control group.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-10-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641025
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641025
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641025/8541
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 12 n. 3 (2013): Jul./Set.; 184-188
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 12 No. 3 (2013): Jul./Set.; 184-188
1677-3225
reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
collection Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br
_version_ 1788167620414930944