Histometric analysis of alveolar bone regeneration with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) and latex membranes
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641025 |
Resumo: | Aim: To investigate the amount of connective tissue migrated into the extraction socket using EPTFE and latex membranes. Methods: Seventeen rats were selected and randomly divided into 3 groups: e-PTFE membrane (n = 6), Latex membrane (n = 6) and Control (no membrane, n=5). After extraction of the maxillary right incisor, the animals of the test groups were subjected to alveolar guided bone regeneration (GBR) surgery and received an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) and a latex membrane, respectively. Thirty days after surgery, the animals were killed and histometric analysis was done to evaluate the migration of connective tissue. Data were analyzed statistically by one-way ANOVA and multiple-comparison Tukey’s test at 5% significance level. Results: There was statistically significant difference between groups ePTFE and Latex (p=0.001), and between groups e-PTFE and Control (p=0.012), but no significant difference was found between groups Latex and Control (p=0.416). Conclusions: The ePTFE membrane showed better results and appeared more adequate for GBR therapy, forming a barrier to prevent the migration of connective tissue into the extraction socket. The latex membrane, on the other hand, did not show benefits over the control group. |
id |
UNICAMP-8_d99e25f226b0b39dc90ff4698501b235 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8641025 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICAMP-8 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Histometric analysis of alveolar bone regeneration with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) and latex membranesBone regenerationMembranesOral surgeryTooth extractionOdontologiaAim: To investigate the amount of connective tissue migrated into the extraction socket using EPTFE and latex membranes. Methods: Seventeen rats were selected and randomly divided into 3 groups: e-PTFE membrane (n = 6), Latex membrane (n = 6) and Control (no membrane, n=5). After extraction of the maxillary right incisor, the animals of the test groups were subjected to alveolar guided bone regeneration (GBR) surgery and received an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) and a latex membrane, respectively. Thirty days after surgery, the animals were killed and histometric analysis was done to evaluate the migration of connective tissue. Data were analyzed statistically by one-way ANOVA and multiple-comparison Tukey’s test at 5% significance level. Results: There was statistically significant difference between groups ePTFE and Latex (p=0.001), and between groups e-PTFE and Control (p=0.012), but no significant difference was found between groups Latex and Control (p=0.416). Conclusions: The ePTFE membrane showed better results and appeared more adequate for GBR therapy, forming a barrier to prevent the migration of connective tissue into the extraction socket. The latex membrane, on the other hand, did not show benefits over the control group.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2015-10-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641025Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 12 n. 3 (2013): Jul./Set.; 184-188Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 12 No. 3 (2013): Jul./Set.; 184-1881677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPporhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641025/8541Copyright (c) 2015 Gustavo Otoboni Molina, Marcelo Tomás de Oliveira, Leonardo Buss, João Davi Faraco Peruchi, Jefferson Ricardo Pereira, Janaina Salomon Ghizonihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMolina, Gustavo OtoboniOliveira, Marcelo Tomás deBuss, LeonardoPeruchi, João Davi FaracoPereira, Jefferson RicardoGhizoni, Janaina Salomon2023-09-29T14:03:31Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8641025Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2023-09-29T14:03:31Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Histometric analysis of alveolar bone regeneration with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) and latex membranes |
title |
Histometric analysis of alveolar bone regeneration with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) and latex membranes |
spellingShingle |
Histometric analysis of alveolar bone regeneration with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) and latex membranes Molina, Gustavo Otoboni Bone regeneration Membranes Oral surgery Tooth extraction Odontologia |
title_short |
Histometric analysis of alveolar bone regeneration with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) and latex membranes |
title_full |
Histometric analysis of alveolar bone regeneration with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) and latex membranes |
title_fullStr |
Histometric analysis of alveolar bone regeneration with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) and latex membranes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Histometric analysis of alveolar bone regeneration with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) and latex membranes |
title_sort |
Histometric analysis of alveolar bone regeneration with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) and latex membranes |
author |
Molina, Gustavo Otoboni |
author_facet |
Molina, Gustavo Otoboni Oliveira, Marcelo Tomás de Buss, Leonardo Peruchi, João Davi Faraco Pereira, Jefferson Ricardo Ghizoni, Janaina Salomon |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Oliveira, Marcelo Tomás de Buss, Leonardo Peruchi, João Davi Faraco Pereira, Jefferson Ricardo Ghizoni, Janaina Salomon |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Molina, Gustavo Otoboni Oliveira, Marcelo Tomás de Buss, Leonardo Peruchi, João Davi Faraco Pereira, Jefferson Ricardo Ghizoni, Janaina Salomon |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Bone regeneration Membranes Oral surgery Tooth extraction Odontologia |
topic |
Bone regeneration Membranes Oral surgery Tooth extraction Odontologia |
description |
Aim: To investigate the amount of connective tissue migrated into the extraction socket using EPTFE and latex membranes. Methods: Seventeen rats were selected and randomly divided into 3 groups: e-PTFE membrane (n = 6), Latex membrane (n = 6) and Control (no membrane, n=5). After extraction of the maxillary right incisor, the animals of the test groups were subjected to alveolar guided bone regeneration (GBR) surgery and received an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) and a latex membrane, respectively. Thirty days after surgery, the animals were killed and histometric analysis was done to evaluate the migration of connective tissue. Data were analyzed statistically by one-way ANOVA and multiple-comparison Tukey’s test at 5% significance level. Results: There was statistically significant difference between groups ePTFE and Latex (p=0.001), and between groups e-PTFE and Control (p=0.012), but no significant difference was found between groups Latex and Control (p=0.416). Conclusions: The ePTFE membrane showed better results and appeared more adequate for GBR therapy, forming a barrier to prevent the migration of connective tissue into the extraction socket. The latex membrane, on the other hand, did not show benefits over the control group. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-10-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641025 |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641025 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641025/8541 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 12 n. 3 (2013): Jul./Set.; 184-188 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 12 No. 3 (2013): Jul./Set.; 184-188 1677-3225 reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) instacron:UNICAMP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
instacron_str |
UNICAMP |
institution |
UNICAMP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
collection |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1788167620414930944 |