Bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images under different parameters of digitization and storage

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Matheus Lima de
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Bóscolo, Frab Norberto, Tosoni, Guilherme Monteiro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641837
Resumo: Aim: To assess the bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images, comparing whether different parameters of digitization and storage change these values. Methods: Twenty radiographs were taken from five partially dentulous dry mandibles with an aluminum 7-mm stepwedge placed on the superior edge of the film. After processing, the films were digitized with a resolution of 600 and 2,400 d.p.i. and saved as TIFF and JPEG files. On every conventional and digitized image, circular regions of interest were selected for densitometry and radiographic contrast analysis. Results: Pearson’s correlation coefficient showed a significant and strong mean gray values association between digitized and conventional images, differing from radiographic contrast that did not show a significant association. ANOVA did not reveal a statistically significant difference in bone density and radiographic contrast among the four digitized image groups, but the conventional image contrast was significantly lower. Conclusions: Bone mineral density did not differ in both conventional and digitized images. The parameters of image compression and resolution, tested in this study, did not change the results of densitometry and digitization process increased the radiographic contrast.
id UNICAMP-8_e51a515735971a98d5fe8eb130a486f1
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8641837
network_acronym_str UNICAMP-8
network_name_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images under different parameters of digitization and storageBone densityDensitometryDental radiographyDigital dental radiographyOdontologyAim: To assess the bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images, comparing whether different parameters of digitization and storage change these values. Methods: Twenty radiographs were taken from five partially dentulous dry mandibles with an aluminum 7-mm stepwedge placed on the superior edge of the film. After processing, the films were digitized with a resolution of 600 and 2,400 d.p.i. and saved as TIFF and JPEG files. On every conventional and digitized image, circular regions of interest were selected for densitometry and radiographic contrast analysis. Results: Pearson’s correlation coefficient showed a significant and strong mean gray values association between digitized and conventional images, differing from radiographic contrast that did not show a significant association. ANOVA did not reveal a statistically significant difference in bone density and radiographic contrast among the four digitized image groups, but the conventional image contrast was significantly lower. Conclusions: Bone mineral density did not differ in both conventional and digitized images. The parameters of image compression and resolution, tested in this study, did not change the results of densitometry and digitization process increased the radiographic contrast.Universidade Estadual de Campinas2015-11-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/864183710.20396/bjos.v9i3.8641837Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 9 n. 3 (2010): Jul./Sep.; 398-401Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 9 No. 3 (2010): Jul./Sep.; 398-4011677-3225reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)instacron:UNICAMPenghttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641837/9336Oliveira, Matheus Lima deBóscolo, Frab NorbertoTosoni, Guilherme Monteiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-02-25T09:12:39Zoai:ojs.periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br:article/8641837Revistahttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/PUBhttps://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/oaibrjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br1677-32251677-3217opendoar:2016-02-25T09:12:39Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images under different parameters of digitization and storage
title Bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images under different parameters of digitization and storage
spellingShingle Bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images under different parameters of digitization and storage
Oliveira, Matheus Lima de
Bone density
Densitometry
Dental radiography
Digital dental radiography
Odontology
title_short Bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images under different parameters of digitization and storage
title_full Bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images under different parameters of digitization and storage
title_fullStr Bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images under different parameters of digitization and storage
title_full_unstemmed Bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images under different parameters of digitization and storage
title_sort Bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images under different parameters of digitization and storage
author Oliveira, Matheus Lima de
author_facet Oliveira, Matheus Lima de
Bóscolo, Frab Norberto
Tosoni, Guilherme Monteiro
author_role author
author2 Bóscolo, Frab Norberto
Tosoni, Guilherme Monteiro
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Matheus Lima de
Bóscolo, Frab Norberto
Tosoni, Guilherme Monteiro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bone density
Densitometry
Dental radiography
Digital dental radiography
Odontology
topic Bone density
Densitometry
Dental radiography
Digital dental radiography
Odontology
description Aim: To assess the bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images, comparing whether different parameters of digitization and storage change these values. Methods: Twenty radiographs were taken from five partially dentulous dry mandibles with an aluminum 7-mm stepwedge placed on the superior edge of the film. After processing, the films were digitized with a resolution of 600 and 2,400 d.p.i. and saved as TIFF and JPEG files. On every conventional and digitized image, circular regions of interest were selected for densitometry and radiographic contrast analysis. Results: Pearson’s correlation coefficient showed a significant and strong mean gray values association between digitized and conventional images, differing from radiographic contrast that did not show a significant association. ANOVA did not reveal a statistically significant difference in bone density and radiographic contrast among the four digitized image groups, but the conventional image contrast was significantly lower. Conclusions: Bone mineral density did not differ in both conventional and digitized images. The parameters of image compression and resolution, tested in this study, did not change the results of densitometry and digitization process increased the radiographic contrast.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-11-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641837
10.20396/bjos.v9i3.8641837
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641837
identifier_str_mv 10.20396/bjos.v9i3.8641837
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641837/9336
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; v. 9 n. 3 (2010): Jul./Sep.; 398-401
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences; Vol. 9 No. 3 (2010): Jul./Sep.; 398-401
1677-3225
reponame:Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron:UNICAMP
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
instacron_str UNICAMP
institution UNICAMP
reponame_str Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
collection Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian journal of oral sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv brjorals@fop.unicamp.br||brjorals@fop.unicamp.br
_version_ 1800216400035315712