Bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images under different parameters of digitization and storage
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://www.bibliotecadigital.unicamp.br/document/?code=43902&opt=4 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/71939 |
Resumo: | Aim: To assess the bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images, comparing whether different parameters of digitization and storage change these values. Methods: Twenty radiographs were taken from five partially dentulous dry mandibles with an aluminum 7-mm stepwedge placed on the superior edge of the film. After processing, the films were digitized with a resolution of 600 and 2,400 d.p.i. and saved as TIFF and JPEG files. On every conventional and digitized image, circular regions of interest were selected for densitometry and radiographic contrast analysis. Results: Pearson's correlation coefficient showed a significant and strong mean gray values association between digitized and conventional images, differing from radiographic contrast that did not show a significant association. ANOVA did not reveal a statistically significant difference in bone density and radiographic contrast among the four digitized image groups, but the conventional image contrast was significantly lower. Conclusions: Bone mineral density did not differ in both conventional and digitized images. The parameters of image compression and resolution, tested in this study, did not change the results of densitometry and digitization process increased the radiographic contrast. |
id |
UNSP_eafaa7315771ee03f34a4b3d6a441d14 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/71939 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images under different parameters of digitization and storageBone densityDensitometryDental radiographyDigital dental radiographyAim: To assess the bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images, comparing whether different parameters of digitization and storage change these values. Methods: Twenty radiographs were taken from five partially dentulous dry mandibles with an aluminum 7-mm stepwedge placed on the superior edge of the film. After processing, the films were digitized with a resolution of 600 and 2,400 d.p.i. and saved as TIFF and JPEG files. On every conventional and digitized image, circular regions of interest were selected for densitometry and radiographic contrast analysis. Results: Pearson's correlation coefficient showed a significant and strong mean gray values association between digitized and conventional images, differing from radiographic contrast that did not show a significant association. ANOVA did not reveal a statistically significant difference in bone density and radiographic contrast among the four digitized image groups, but the conventional image contrast was significantly lower. Conclusions: Bone mineral density did not differ in both conventional and digitized images. The parameters of image compression and resolution, tested in this study, did not change the results of densitometry and digitization process increased the radiographic contrast.Department of Oral Diagnosis Piracicaba Dental School State University of CampinasDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery Araraquara Dental School Sao Paulo State UniversityDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery Araraquara Dental School Sao Paulo State UniversityUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)de Oliveira, Matheus LimaBóscolo, Frab NorbertoTosoni, Guilherme Monteiro [UNESP]2014-05-27T11:24:49Z2014-05-27T11:24:49Z2010-10-21info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article398-401application/pdfhttp://www.bibliotecadigital.unicamp.br/document/?code=43902&opt=4Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, v. 9, n. 3, p. 398-401, 2010.1677-32171677-3225http://hdl.handle.net/11449/719392-s2.0-779579611792-s2.0-77957961179.pdf0692567697594977Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences0,131info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-26T15:21:48Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/71939Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-26T15:21:48Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images under different parameters of digitization and storage |
title |
Bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images under different parameters of digitization and storage |
spellingShingle |
Bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images under different parameters of digitization and storage de Oliveira, Matheus Lima Bone density Densitometry Dental radiography Digital dental radiography |
title_short |
Bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images under different parameters of digitization and storage |
title_full |
Bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images under different parameters of digitization and storage |
title_fullStr |
Bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images under different parameters of digitization and storage |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images under different parameters of digitization and storage |
title_sort |
Bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images under different parameters of digitization and storage |
author |
de Oliveira, Matheus Lima |
author_facet |
de Oliveira, Matheus Lima Bóscolo, Frab Norberto Tosoni, Guilherme Monteiro [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bóscolo, Frab Norberto Tosoni, Guilherme Monteiro [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
de Oliveira, Matheus Lima Bóscolo, Frab Norberto Tosoni, Guilherme Monteiro [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Bone density Densitometry Dental radiography Digital dental radiography |
topic |
Bone density Densitometry Dental radiography Digital dental radiography |
description |
Aim: To assess the bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images, comparing whether different parameters of digitization and storage change these values. Methods: Twenty radiographs were taken from five partially dentulous dry mandibles with an aluminum 7-mm stepwedge placed on the superior edge of the film. After processing, the films were digitized with a resolution of 600 and 2,400 d.p.i. and saved as TIFF and JPEG files. On every conventional and digitized image, circular regions of interest were selected for densitometry and radiographic contrast analysis. Results: Pearson's correlation coefficient showed a significant and strong mean gray values association between digitized and conventional images, differing from radiographic contrast that did not show a significant association. ANOVA did not reveal a statistically significant difference in bone density and radiographic contrast among the four digitized image groups, but the conventional image contrast was significantly lower. Conclusions: Bone mineral density did not differ in both conventional and digitized images. The parameters of image compression and resolution, tested in this study, did not change the results of densitometry and digitization process increased the radiographic contrast. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-10-21 2014-05-27T11:24:49Z 2014-05-27T11:24:49Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.bibliotecadigital.unicamp.br/document/?code=43902&opt=4 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, v. 9, n. 3, p. 398-401, 2010. 1677-3217 1677-3225 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/71939 2-s2.0-77957961179 2-s2.0-77957961179.pdf 0692567697594977 |
url |
http://www.bibliotecadigital.unicamp.br/document/?code=43902&opt=4 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/71939 |
identifier_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, v. 9, n. 3, p. 398-401, 2010. 1677-3217 1677-3225 2-s2.0-77957961179 2-s2.0-77957961179.pdf 0692567697594977 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences 0,131 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
398-401 application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositoriounesp@unesp.br |
_version_ |
1813546470403473408 |