Bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images under different parameters of digitization and storage

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: de Oliveira, Matheus Lima
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Bóscolo, Frab Norberto, Tosoni, Guilherme Monteiro [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://www.bibliotecadigital.unicamp.br/document/?code=43902&opt=4
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/71939
Resumo: Aim: To assess the bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images, comparing whether different parameters of digitization and storage change these values. Methods: Twenty radiographs were taken from five partially dentulous dry mandibles with an aluminum 7-mm stepwedge placed on the superior edge of the film. After processing, the films were digitized with a resolution of 600 and 2,400 d.p.i. and saved as TIFF and JPEG files. On every conventional and digitized image, circular regions of interest were selected for densitometry and radiographic contrast analysis. Results: Pearson's correlation coefficient showed a significant and strong mean gray values association between digitized and conventional images, differing from radiographic contrast that did not show a significant association. ANOVA did not reveal a statistically significant difference in bone density and radiographic contrast among the four digitized image groups, but the conventional image contrast was significantly lower. Conclusions: Bone mineral density did not differ in both conventional and digitized images. The parameters of image compression and resolution, tested in this study, did not change the results of densitometry and digitization process increased the radiographic contrast.
id UNSP_eafaa7315771ee03f34a4b3d6a441d14
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/71939
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images under different parameters of digitization and storageBone densityDensitometryDental radiographyDigital dental radiographyAim: To assess the bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images, comparing whether different parameters of digitization and storage change these values. Methods: Twenty radiographs were taken from five partially dentulous dry mandibles with an aluminum 7-mm stepwedge placed on the superior edge of the film. After processing, the films were digitized with a resolution of 600 and 2,400 d.p.i. and saved as TIFF and JPEG files. On every conventional and digitized image, circular regions of interest were selected for densitometry and radiographic contrast analysis. Results: Pearson's correlation coefficient showed a significant and strong mean gray values association between digitized and conventional images, differing from radiographic contrast that did not show a significant association. ANOVA did not reveal a statistically significant difference in bone density and radiographic contrast among the four digitized image groups, but the conventional image contrast was significantly lower. Conclusions: Bone mineral density did not differ in both conventional and digitized images. The parameters of image compression and resolution, tested in this study, did not change the results of densitometry and digitization process increased the radiographic contrast.Department of Oral Diagnosis Piracicaba Dental School State University of CampinasDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery Araraquara Dental School Sao Paulo State UniversityDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery Araraquara Dental School Sao Paulo State UniversityUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)de Oliveira, Matheus LimaBóscolo, Frab NorbertoTosoni, Guilherme Monteiro [UNESP]2014-05-27T11:24:49Z2014-05-27T11:24:49Z2010-10-21info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article398-401application/pdfhttp://www.bibliotecadigital.unicamp.br/document/?code=43902&opt=4Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, v. 9, n. 3, p. 398-401, 2010.1677-32171677-3225http://hdl.handle.net/11449/719392-s2.0-779579611792-s2.0-77957961179.pdf0692567697594977Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences0,131info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-09-26T15:21:48Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/71939Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestrepositoriounesp@unesp.bropendoar:29462024-09-26T15:21:48Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images under different parameters of digitization and storage
title Bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images under different parameters of digitization and storage
spellingShingle Bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images under different parameters of digitization and storage
de Oliveira, Matheus Lima
Bone density
Densitometry
Dental radiography
Digital dental radiography
title_short Bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images under different parameters of digitization and storage
title_full Bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images under different parameters of digitization and storage
title_fullStr Bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images under different parameters of digitization and storage
title_full_unstemmed Bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images under different parameters of digitization and storage
title_sort Bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images under different parameters of digitization and storage
author de Oliveira, Matheus Lima
author_facet de Oliveira, Matheus Lima
Bóscolo, Frab Norberto
Tosoni, Guilherme Monteiro [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Bóscolo, Frab Norberto
Tosoni, Guilherme Monteiro [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv de Oliveira, Matheus Lima
Bóscolo, Frab Norberto
Tosoni, Guilherme Monteiro [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bone density
Densitometry
Dental radiography
Digital dental radiography
topic Bone density
Densitometry
Dental radiography
Digital dental radiography
description Aim: To assess the bone mineral density on conventional and digitized images, comparing whether different parameters of digitization and storage change these values. Methods: Twenty radiographs were taken from five partially dentulous dry mandibles with an aluminum 7-mm stepwedge placed on the superior edge of the film. After processing, the films were digitized with a resolution of 600 and 2,400 d.p.i. and saved as TIFF and JPEG files. On every conventional and digitized image, circular regions of interest were selected for densitometry and radiographic contrast analysis. Results: Pearson's correlation coefficient showed a significant and strong mean gray values association between digitized and conventional images, differing from radiographic contrast that did not show a significant association. ANOVA did not reveal a statistically significant difference in bone density and radiographic contrast among the four digitized image groups, but the conventional image contrast was significantly lower. Conclusions: Bone mineral density did not differ in both conventional and digitized images. The parameters of image compression and resolution, tested in this study, did not change the results of densitometry and digitization process increased the radiographic contrast.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-10-21
2014-05-27T11:24:49Z
2014-05-27T11:24:49Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.bibliotecadigital.unicamp.br/document/?code=43902&opt=4
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, v. 9, n. 3, p. 398-401, 2010.
1677-3217
1677-3225
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/71939
2-s2.0-77957961179
2-s2.0-77957961179.pdf
0692567697594977
url http://www.bibliotecadigital.unicamp.br/document/?code=43902&opt=4
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/71939
identifier_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, v. 9, n. 3, p. 398-401, 2010.
1677-3217
1677-3225
2-s2.0-77957961179
2-s2.0-77957961179.pdf
0692567697594977
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
0,131
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 398-401
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositoriounesp@unesp.br
_version_ 1813546470403473408