Supply of high Cost Assistance Technologies by Minicipalities to People With Deficiency: A Discussion on the Polysemy of the Equality Principle

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Flávia de Paiva Medeiros de
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Lavôr, Bruno Vieira de Oliveira, Silva, Paulo Henrique Tavares da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/11228
Resumo: Tutelage and juridical promotion of people with deficiency are analyzed by the deduction method and by bibliographic and jurisprudential research through the principle of equality in its multiple forms within the background of solidarity among the federal instances of the Brazilian Health System. We will evaluate whether municipalities are required to supply high cost assistance technologies on the basis of differentiated treatment to people with deficiency. A jurisprudential research at the site of the Justice Tribunal of the state of Paraíba, Brazil, was conducted: judicial decisions do not curve to the criterion of deficiency and give equal treatment to health demands, even though the person has deficiency. In spite of such jurisprudential omissions, one may conclude that in the case of health, there is an equality that prevents differentiated treatment in the supply of assistance technology or medicine based on avoidance of privileges in the benefit of some to the detriment of others.
id UNICESU-0_03e81297244437097f1c980d195807c3
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11228
network_acronym_str UNICESU-0
network_name_str Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Supply of high Cost Assistance Technologies by Minicipalities to People With Deficiency: A Discussion on the Polysemy of the Equality PrincipleSuministro, por Parte de los Municipios, de Tecnologías Asistencial de Alto Costo para Personas con Deficiencia: Una Discusión a partir de la Polisemia del Principio de la IgualdadFornecimento, pelos Municípios, de Tecnologias Assistivas de Alto custo para Pessoas com Deficiência: Uma Discussão a partir da Polissemia do Princípio da IgualdadeAssistance technologiesBrazilian Health SystemEquality principlePeople with deficiencySolidarityPersonas con deficienciaPrincipio de la igualdadSistema Único de SaludSolidaridadTecnologías asistencialesPessoas com deficiênciaPrincípio da igualdadeSistema Único de SaúdeSolidariedadeTecnologias assistivasTutelage and juridical promotion of people with deficiency are analyzed by the deduction method and by bibliographic and jurisprudential research through the principle of equality in its multiple forms within the background of solidarity among the federal instances of the Brazilian Health System. We will evaluate whether municipalities are required to supply high cost assistance technologies on the basis of differentiated treatment to people with deficiency. A jurisprudential research at the site of the Justice Tribunal of the state of Paraíba, Brazil, was conducted: judicial decisions do not curve to the criterion of deficiency and give equal treatment to health demands, even though the person has deficiency. In spite of such jurisprudential omissions, one may conclude that in the case of health, there is an equality that prevents differentiated treatment in the supply of assistance technology or medicine based on avoidance of privileges in the benefit of some to the detriment of others. Se trata de un artículo que, mediante el empleo del método deductivo y de la metodología de investigación bibliográfica y jurisprudencial, tematiza la tutela y promoción jurídica de la persona con deficiencia a partir del principio de la igualdad en sus múltiples acepciones, teniendo como paño de fondo la tesis de la solidaridad entre los entes federativos en el Sistema Único de Salud. Con eso, se tiene por objetivo evaluar si los municipios están obligados a suministrar tecnologías asistenciales de alto costo, con fundamento en eventual deber de tratamiento diferenciado a las personas con deficiencia. De ese modo, por intermedio de investigación jurisprudencial en el sitio del Tribunal de Justicia del Estado de Paraíba, se observó que las decisiones judiciales no se centran sobre el criterio de la deficiencia, confiriendo tratamiento uniforme en las demandas de salud, sea o no el paciente persona con deficiencia. Sin embargo, la omisión jurisprudencial, fue posible concluir que, en materia de salud, existe igualdad substancial que impide el tratamiento diferenciado en el suministro de la tecnología asistencial o del medicamento, so pena de crearse privilegios infundados en favor de la vida de unos y en perjuicio de la vida de otros. Trata-se de artigo que, mediante emprego do método dedutivo e da metodologia de pesquisa bibliográfica e jurisprudencial, tematiza a tutela e promoção jurídica da pessoa com deficiência a partir do princípio da igualdade em suas múltiplas acepções, tendo como pano de fundo a tese da solidariedade entre os entes federativos no Sistema Único de Saúde. Com isso, objetiva-se avaliar se os municípios são obrigados a fornecer tecnologias assistivas de alto custo, com fundamento em eventual dever de tratamento diferenciado às pessoas com deficiência. Desse modo, por meio de pesquisa jurisprudencial no sítio do Tribunal de Justiça do Estado da Paraíba, observou-se que as decisões judiciais não se debruçam sobre o critério da deficiência, conferindo tratamento uniforme nas demandas de saúde, seja ou não o paciente pessoa com deficiência. Não obstante a omissão jurisprudencial, foi possível concluir que, em matéria de saúde, existe igualdade substancial que impede o tratamento diferenciado no fornecimento da tecnologia assistiva ou do medicamento, sob pena de se criar privilégios infundados em favor da vida de uns e em prejuízo da vida de outros. Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar2022-12-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/1122810.17765/2176-9184.2022v22n3.e11228Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 22 n. 3 (2022): set./dez.; 623-6402176-91841677-6402reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)instacron:UNICESUporhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/11228/7228Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestradohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Flávia de Paiva Medeiros de Lavôr, Bruno Vieira de Oliveira Silva, Paulo Henrique Tavares da 2023-01-05T13:37:43Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11228Revistahttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridicaPRIhttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/oai||naep@unicesumar.edu.br2176-91841677-6402opendoar:2023-01-05T13:37:43Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Supply of high Cost Assistance Technologies by Minicipalities to People With Deficiency: A Discussion on the Polysemy of the Equality Principle
Suministro, por Parte de los Municipios, de Tecnologías Asistencial de Alto Costo para Personas con Deficiencia: Una Discusión a partir de la Polisemia del Principio de la Igualdad
Fornecimento, pelos Municípios, de Tecnologias Assistivas de Alto custo para Pessoas com Deficiência: Uma Discussão a partir da Polissemia do Princípio da Igualdade
title Supply of high Cost Assistance Technologies by Minicipalities to People With Deficiency: A Discussion on the Polysemy of the Equality Principle
spellingShingle Supply of high Cost Assistance Technologies by Minicipalities to People With Deficiency: A Discussion on the Polysemy of the Equality Principle
Oliveira, Flávia de Paiva Medeiros de
Assistance technologies
Brazilian Health System
Equality principle
People with deficiency
Solidarity
Personas con deficiencia
Principio de la igualdad
Sistema Único de Salud
Solidaridad
Tecnologías asistenciales
Pessoas com deficiência
Princípio da igualdade
Sistema Único de Saúde
Solidariedade
Tecnologias assistivas
title_short Supply of high Cost Assistance Technologies by Minicipalities to People With Deficiency: A Discussion on the Polysemy of the Equality Principle
title_full Supply of high Cost Assistance Technologies by Minicipalities to People With Deficiency: A Discussion on the Polysemy of the Equality Principle
title_fullStr Supply of high Cost Assistance Technologies by Minicipalities to People With Deficiency: A Discussion on the Polysemy of the Equality Principle
title_full_unstemmed Supply of high Cost Assistance Technologies by Minicipalities to People With Deficiency: A Discussion on the Polysemy of the Equality Principle
title_sort Supply of high Cost Assistance Technologies by Minicipalities to People With Deficiency: A Discussion on the Polysemy of the Equality Principle
author Oliveira, Flávia de Paiva Medeiros de
author_facet Oliveira, Flávia de Paiva Medeiros de
Lavôr, Bruno Vieira de Oliveira
Silva, Paulo Henrique Tavares da
author_role author
author2 Lavôr, Bruno Vieira de Oliveira
Silva, Paulo Henrique Tavares da
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Flávia de Paiva Medeiros de
Lavôr, Bruno Vieira de Oliveira
Silva, Paulo Henrique Tavares da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Assistance technologies
Brazilian Health System
Equality principle
People with deficiency
Solidarity
Personas con deficiencia
Principio de la igualdad
Sistema Único de Salud
Solidaridad
Tecnologías asistenciales
Pessoas com deficiência
Princípio da igualdade
Sistema Único de Saúde
Solidariedade
Tecnologias assistivas
topic Assistance technologies
Brazilian Health System
Equality principle
People with deficiency
Solidarity
Personas con deficiencia
Principio de la igualdad
Sistema Único de Salud
Solidaridad
Tecnologías asistenciales
Pessoas com deficiência
Princípio da igualdade
Sistema Único de Saúde
Solidariedade
Tecnologias assistivas
description Tutelage and juridical promotion of people with deficiency are analyzed by the deduction method and by bibliographic and jurisprudential research through the principle of equality in its multiple forms within the background of solidarity among the federal instances of the Brazilian Health System. We will evaluate whether municipalities are required to supply high cost assistance technologies on the basis of differentiated treatment to people with deficiency. A jurisprudential research at the site of the Justice Tribunal of the state of Paraíba, Brazil, was conducted: judicial decisions do not curve to the criterion of deficiency and give equal treatment to health demands, even though the person has deficiency. In spite of such jurisprudential omissions, one may conclude that in the case of health, there is an equality that prevents differentiated treatment in the supply of assistance technology or medicine based on avoidance of privileges in the benefit of some to the detriment of others.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/11228
10.17765/2176-9184.2022v22n3.e11228
url https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/11228
identifier_str_mv 10.17765/2176-9184.2022v22n3.e11228
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/11228/7228
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 22 n. 3 (2022): set./dez.; 623-640
2176-9184
1677-6402
reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
instacron:UNICESU
instname_str Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
instacron_str UNICESU
institution UNICESU
reponame_str Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
collection Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||naep@unicesumar.edu.br
_version_ 1798042388853161984

Registros relacionados