Supply of high Cost Assistance Technologies by Minicipalities to People With Deficiency: A Discussion on the Polysemy of the Equality Principle
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/11228 |
Resumo: | Tutelage and juridical promotion of people with deficiency are analyzed by the deduction method and by bibliographic and jurisprudential research through the principle of equality in its multiple forms within the background of solidarity among the federal instances of the Brazilian Health System. We will evaluate whether municipalities are required to supply high cost assistance technologies on the basis of differentiated treatment to people with deficiency. A jurisprudential research at the site of the Justice Tribunal of the state of Paraíba, Brazil, was conducted: judicial decisions do not curve to the criterion of deficiency and give equal treatment to health demands, even though the person has deficiency. In spite of such jurisprudential omissions, one may conclude that in the case of health, there is an equality that prevents differentiated treatment in the supply of assistance technology or medicine based on avoidance of privileges in the benefit of some to the detriment of others. |
id |
UNICESU-0_03e81297244437097f1c980d195807c3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11228 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICESU-0 |
network_name_str |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Supply of high Cost Assistance Technologies by Minicipalities to People With Deficiency: A Discussion on the Polysemy of the Equality PrincipleSuministro, por Parte de los Municipios, de Tecnologías Asistencial de Alto Costo para Personas con Deficiencia: Una Discusión a partir de la Polisemia del Principio de la IgualdadFornecimento, pelos Municípios, de Tecnologias Assistivas de Alto custo para Pessoas com Deficiência: Uma Discussão a partir da Polissemia do Princípio da IgualdadeAssistance technologiesBrazilian Health SystemEquality principlePeople with deficiencySolidarityPersonas con deficienciaPrincipio de la igualdadSistema Único de SaludSolidaridadTecnologías asistencialesPessoas com deficiênciaPrincípio da igualdadeSistema Único de SaúdeSolidariedadeTecnologias assistivasTutelage and juridical promotion of people with deficiency are analyzed by the deduction method and by bibliographic and jurisprudential research through the principle of equality in its multiple forms within the background of solidarity among the federal instances of the Brazilian Health System. We will evaluate whether municipalities are required to supply high cost assistance technologies on the basis of differentiated treatment to people with deficiency. A jurisprudential research at the site of the Justice Tribunal of the state of Paraíba, Brazil, was conducted: judicial decisions do not curve to the criterion of deficiency and give equal treatment to health demands, even though the person has deficiency. In spite of such jurisprudential omissions, one may conclude that in the case of health, there is an equality that prevents differentiated treatment in the supply of assistance technology or medicine based on avoidance of privileges in the benefit of some to the detriment of others. Se trata de un artículo que, mediante el empleo del método deductivo y de la metodología de investigación bibliográfica y jurisprudencial, tematiza la tutela y promoción jurídica de la persona con deficiencia a partir del principio de la igualdad en sus múltiples acepciones, teniendo como paño de fondo la tesis de la solidaridad entre los entes federativos en el Sistema Único de Salud. Con eso, se tiene por objetivo evaluar si los municipios están obligados a suministrar tecnologías asistenciales de alto costo, con fundamento en eventual deber de tratamiento diferenciado a las personas con deficiencia. De ese modo, por intermedio de investigación jurisprudencial en el sitio del Tribunal de Justicia del Estado de Paraíba, se observó que las decisiones judiciales no se centran sobre el criterio de la deficiencia, confiriendo tratamiento uniforme en las demandas de salud, sea o no el paciente persona con deficiencia. Sin embargo, la omisión jurisprudencial, fue posible concluir que, en materia de salud, existe igualdad substancial que impide el tratamiento diferenciado en el suministro de la tecnología asistencial o del medicamento, so pena de crearse privilegios infundados en favor de la vida de unos y en perjuicio de la vida de otros. Trata-se de artigo que, mediante emprego do método dedutivo e da metodologia de pesquisa bibliográfica e jurisprudencial, tematiza a tutela e promoção jurídica da pessoa com deficiência a partir do princípio da igualdade em suas múltiplas acepções, tendo como pano de fundo a tese da solidariedade entre os entes federativos no Sistema Único de Saúde. Com isso, objetiva-se avaliar se os municípios são obrigados a fornecer tecnologias assistivas de alto custo, com fundamento em eventual dever de tratamento diferenciado às pessoas com deficiência. Desse modo, por meio de pesquisa jurisprudencial no sítio do Tribunal de Justiça do Estado da Paraíba, observou-se que as decisões judiciais não se debruçam sobre o critério da deficiência, conferindo tratamento uniforme nas demandas de saúde, seja ou não o paciente pessoa com deficiência. Não obstante a omissão jurisprudencial, foi possível concluir que, em matéria de saúde, existe igualdade substancial que impede o tratamento diferenciado no fornecimento da tecnologia assistiva ou do medicamento, sob pena de se criar privilégios infundados em favor da vida de uns e em prejuízo da vida de outros. Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar2022-12-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/1122810.17765/2176-9184.2022v22n3.e11228Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 22 n. 3 (2022): set./dez.; 623-6402176-91841677-6402reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)instacron:UNICESUporhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/11228/7228Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestradohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Flávia de Paiva Medeiros de Lavôr, Bruno Vieira de Oliveira Silva, Paulo Henrique Tavares da 2023-01-05T13:37:43Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/11228Revistahttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridicaPRIhttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/oai||naep@unicesumar.edu.br2176-91841677-6402opendoar:2023-01-05T13:37:43Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Supply of high Cost Assistance Technologies by Minicipalities to People With Deficiency: A Discussion on the Polysemy of the Equality Principle Suministro, por Parte de los Municipios, de Tecnologías Asistencial de Alto Costo para Personas con Deficiencia: Una Discusión a partir de la Polisemia del Principio de la Igualdad Fornecimento, pelos Municípios, de Tecnologias Assistivas de Alto custo para Pessoas com Deficiência: Uma Discussão a partir da Polissemia do Princípio da Igualdade |
title |
Supply of high Cost Assistance Technologies by Minicipalities to People With Deficiency: A Discussion on the Polysemy of the Equality Principle |
spellingShingle |
Supply of high Cost Assistance Technologies by Minicipalities to People With Deficiency: A Discussion on the Polysemy of the Equality Principle Oliveira, Flávia de Paiva Medeiros de Assistance technologies Brazilian Health System Equality principle People with deficiency Solidarity Personas con deficiencia Principio de la igualdad Sistema Único de Salud Solidaridad Tecnologías asistenciales Pessoas com deficiência Princípio da igualdade Sistema Único de Saúde Solidariedade Tecnologias assistivas |
title_short |
Supply of high Cost Assistance Technologies by Minicipalities to People With Deficiency: A Discussion on the Polysemy of the Equality Principle |
title_full |
Supply of high Cost Assistance Technologies by Minicipalities to People With Deficiency: A Discussion on the Polysemy of the Equality Principle |
title_fullStr |
Supply of high Cost Assistance Technologies by Minicipalities to People With Deficiency: A Discussion on the Polysemy of the Equality Principle |
title_full_unstemmed |
Supply of high Cost Assistance Technologies by Minicipalities to People With Deficiency: A Discussion on the Polysemy of the Equality Principle |
title_sort |
Supply of high Cost Assistance Technologies by Minicipalities to People With Deficiency: A Discussion on the Polysemy of the Equality Principle |
author |
Oliveira, Flávia de Paiva Medeiros de |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Flávia de Paiva Medeiros de Lavôr, Bruno Vieira de Oliveira Silva, Paulo Henrique Tavares da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lavôr, Bruno Vieira de Oliveira Silva, Paulo Henrique Tavares da |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Flávia de Paiva Medeiros de Lavôr, Bruno Vieira de Oliveira Silva, Paulo Henrique Tavares da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Assistance technologies Brazilian Health System Equality principle People with deficiency Solidarity Personas con deficiencia Principio de la igualdad Sistema Único de Salud Solidaridad Tecnologías asistenciales Pessoas com deficiência Princípio da igualdade Sistema Único de Saúde Solidariedade Tecnologias assistivas |
topic |
Assistance technologies Brazilian Health System Equality principle People with deficiency Solidarity Personas con deficiencia Principio de la igualdad Sistema Único de Salud Solidaridad Tecnologías asistenciales Pessoas com deficiência Princípio da igualdade Sistema Único de Saúde Solidariedade Tecnologias assistivas |
description |
Tutelage and juridical promotion of people with deficiency are analyzed by the deduction method and by bibliographic and jurisprudential research through the principle of equality in its multiple forms within the background of solidarity among the federal instances of the Brazilian Health System. We will evaluate whether municipalities are required to supply high cost assistance technologies on the basis of differentiated treatment to people with deficiency. A jurisprudential research at the site of the Justice Tribunal of the state of Paraíba, Brazil, was conducted: judicial decisions do not curve to the criterion of deficiency and give equal treatment to health demands, even though the person has deficiency. In spite of such jurisprudential omissions, one may conclude that in the case of health, there is an equality that prevents differentiated treatment in the supply of assistance technology or medicine based on avoidance of privileges in the benefit of some to the detriment of others. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-12-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/11228 10.17765/2176-9184.2022v22n3.e11228 |
url |
https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/11228 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.17765/2176-9184.2022v22n3.e11228 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/11228/7228 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 22 n. 3 (2022): set./dez.; 623-640 2176-9184 1677-6402 reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR) instacron:UNICESU |
instname_str |
Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR) |
instacron_str |
UNICESU |
institution |
UNICESU |
reponame_str |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
collection |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||naep@unicesumar.edu.br |
_version_ |
1798042388853161984 |