ACTIVIST CYBERCONSUMER AND DECREE 7.962/2013: PROS AND CONTRAS OF THE EVALUATION CRITERIA OF VIRTUAL CONSUMPTION
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/4411 |
Resumo: | The popularization of electronic consumption during recent years without any evolution in legislation brought about several situations in which the consumer was left unguarded. Virtual tools were constructed so that consumer may assess firms and report issues, such as the E-bit. Although a norm was published in 2013 (Decree 7962) that regulated e-commerce, it may be asked whether the sites of the best evaluated suppliers in E-Bit tools are the sites that most attend to the requirements of the norm. Current paper identifies whether the best assessed firms by consumers correspond to those that attends the terms of the law. The dialectic approach, the comparative procedure method and bibliographical and documental research techniques coupled to observation were the methods employed. The requirements that must be observed by law are not the determining factors for the characterization of the firm as excellent from the point of view of the consumer. |
id |
UNICESU-0_0a477e7c947d9091ca009fff64ff33b8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4411 |
network_acronym_str |
UNICESU-0 |
network_name_str |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
ACTIVIST CYBERCONSUMER AND DECREE 7.962/2013: PROS AND CONTRAS OF THE EVALUATION CRITERIA OF VIRTUAL CONSUMPTIONCIBERCONSUMIDOR ATIVISTA Y EL DECRETO 7.962/13: ENCUENTROS Y DESENCUENTROS EN LOS CRITERIOS DE EVALUACIÓN DEL CONSUMO VIRTUALCiberconsumidor Ativista e o Decreto 7.962/13: Encontros e Desencontros nos Critérios de Avaliação do Consumo VirtualCyberconsumptionEletronic contactConsumer 2.0E-bitCiberconsumoConsumo 2.0Contrato ElectrónicoE-bit.CiberconsumoConsumidor 2.0Contrato EletrônicoE-bit.The popularization of electronic consumption during recent years without any evolution in legislation brought about several situations in which the consumer was left unguarded. Virtual tools were constructed so that consumer may assess firms and report issues, such as the E-bit. Although a norm was published in 2013 (Decree 7962) that regulated e-commerce, it may be asked whether the sites of the best evaluated suppliers in E-Bit tools are the sites that most attend to the requirements of the norm. Current paper identifies whether the best assessed firms by consumers correspond to those that attends the terms of the law. The dialectic approach, the comparative procedure method and bibliographical and documental research techniques coupled to observation were the methods employed. The requirements that must be observed by law are not the determining factors for the characterization of the firm as excellent from the point of view of the consumer.La popularización del comercio electrónico en los últimos años, desacompañada de una evolución legislativa, ocasionó muchas situaciones de desprotección del consumidor. En ese contexto, fueron creadas herramientas virtuales que permitían a los consumidores evaluar las empresas y relatar problemas, como E-bit. Solo en 2013, fue editada una norma (Decreto 7.962) que reglamentó el comercio electrónico. Aún, se cuestiona si los sitios de los proveedores mejor evaluados por los consumidores en la herramienta E-bit corresponden a los sitios que mejor atienden a las exigencias de la legislación. Así, el presente trabajo objetiva identificar si las empresas mejor evaluadas por los consumidores en la herramienta virtual corresponden a aquellas que mejor cumplen las obligaciones impuestas por la legislación. El método de abordaje utilizado fue el dialéctico, método de procedimiento comparativo y técnicas de pesquisa bibliográfica, documental y observatorio participante. Se concluye, al final del análisis, que los requisitos a ser cumplidos por la legislación no son los factores determinantes para caracterización de una empresa como buena por el consumidor activista.A popularização do comércio eletrônico nos últimos anos, desacompanhada de uma evolução legislativa, acarretou muitas situações de desproteção do consumidor. Nesse contexto, foram criadas ferramentas virtuais que permitiam aos consumidores avaliarem as empresas e relatarem problemas, como E-bit. Somente no ano de 2013, foi editada uma norma (Decreto 7.962) que regulamentasse o comércio eletrônico. Todavia, questiona-se se os sites dos fornecedores melhor avaliados pelos consumidores na ferramenta E-bit correspondem aos sites que mais atendem às exigências da legislação. Assim, o presente trabalho objetiva identificar se as empresas mais bem avaliadas pelos consumidores na ferramenta de avaliação virtual correspondem àquelas que mais atentam às obrigações impostas pela legislação. O método de abordagem utilizado foi o dialético, método de procedimento comparativo e técnicas de pesquisa bibliográfica, documental e observatória participante. Conclui-se, ao final da análise, que os requisitos a serem cumpridos pela legislação não são os fatores determinantes para caracterização de uma empresa como boa pelo consumidor ativista.Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar2016-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/441110.17765/2176-9184.2016v16n2p455-485Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 16 n. 2 (2016): maio/ago.; 455-4852176-91841677-6402reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)instacron:UNICESUporhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/4411/2805Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestradoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Rafael Santos deSalla, Mariana FenaltiBertoldo, Jaqueline2020-10-20T17:46:34Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4411Revistahttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridicaPRIhttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/oai||naep@unicesumar.edu.br2176-91841677-6402opendoar:2020-10-20T17:46:34Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
ACTIVIST CYBERCONSUMER AND DECREE 7.962/2013: PROS AND CONTRAS OF THE EVALUATION CRITERIA OF VIRTUAL CONSUMPTION CIBERCONSUMIDOR ATIVISTA Y EL DECRETO 7.962/13: ENCUENTROS Y DESENCUENTROS EN LOS CRITERIOS DE EVALUACIÓN DEL CONSUMO VIRTUAL Ciberconsumidor Ativista e o Decreto 7.962/13: Encontros e Desencontros nos Critérios de Avaliação do Consumo Virtual |
title |
ACTIVIST CYBERCONSUMER AND DECREE 7.962/2013: PROS AND CONTRAS OF THE EVALUATION CRITERIA OF VIRTUAL CONSUMPTION |
spellingShingle |
ACTIVIST CYBERCONSUMER AND DECREE 7.962/2013: PROS AND CONTRAS OF THE EVALUATION CRITERIA OF VIRTUAL CONSUMPTION Oliveira, Rafael Santos de Cyberconsumption Eletronic contact Consumer 2.0 E-bit Ciberconsumo Consumo 2.0 Contrato Electrónico E-bit. Ciberconsumo Consumidor 2.0 Contrato Eletrônico E-bit. |
title_short |
ACTIVIST CYBERCONSUMER AND DECREE 7.962/2013: PROS AND CONTRAS OF THE EVALUATION CRITERIA OF VIRTUAL CONSUMPTION |
title_full |
ACTIVIST CYBERCONSUMER AND DECREE 7.962/2013: PROS AND CONTRAS OF THE EVALUATION CRITERIA OF VIRTUAL CONSUMPTION |
title_fullStr |
ACTIVIST CYBERCONSUMER AND DECREE 7.962/2013: PROS AND CONTRAS OF THE EVALUATION CRITERIA OF VIRTUAL CONSUMPTION |
title_full_unstemmed |
ACTIVIST CYBERCONSUMER AND DECREE 7.962/2013: PROS AND CONTRAS OF THE EVALUATION CRITERIA OF VIRTUAL CONSUMPTION |
title_sort |
ACTIVIST CYBERCONSUMER AND DECREE 7.962/2013: PROS AND CONTRAS OF THE EVALUATION CRITERIA OF VIRTUAL CONSUMPTION |
author |
Oliveira, Rafael Santos de |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Rafael Santos de Salla, Mariana Fenalti Bertoldo, Jaqueline |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Salla, Mariana Fenalti Bertoldo, Jaqueline |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Rafael Santos de Salla, Mariana Fenalti Bertoldo, Jaqueline |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cyberconsumption Eletronic contact Consumer 2.0 E-bit Ciberconsumo Consumo 2.0 Contrato Electrónico E-bit. Ciberconsumo Consumidor 2.0 Contrato Eletrônico E-bit. |
topic |
Cyberconsumption Eletronic contact Consumer 2.0 E-bit Ciberconsumo Consumo 2.0 Contrato Electrónico E-bit. Ciberconsumo Consumidor 2.0 Contrato Eletrônico E-bit. |
description |
The popularization of electronic consumption during recent years without any evolution in legislation brought about several situations in which the consumer was left unguarded. Virtual tools were constructed so that consumer may assess firms and report issues, such as the E-bit. Although a norm was published in 2013 (Decree 7962) that regulated e-commerce, it may be asked whether the sites of the best evaluated suppliers in E-Bit tools are the sites that most attend to the requirements of the norm. Current paper identifies whether the best assessed firms by consumers correspond to those that attends the terms of the law. The dialectic approach, the comparative procedure method and bibliographical and documental research techniques coupled to observation were the methods employed. The requirements that must be observed by law are not the determining factors for the characterization of the firm as excellent from the point of view of the consumer. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-08-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/4411 10.17765/2176-9184.2016v16n2p455-485 |
url |
https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/4411 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.17765/2176-9184.2016v16n2p455-485 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/4411/2805 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 16 n. 2 (2016): maio/ago.; 455-485 2176-9184 1677-6402 reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR) instacron:UNICESU |
instname_str |
Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR) |
instacron_str |
UNICESU |
institution |
UNICESU |
reponame_str |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
collection |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||naep@unicesumar.edu.br |
_version_ |
1798042387327483904 |