ACTIVIST CYBERCONSUMER AND DECREE 7.962/2013: PROS AND CONTRAS OF THE EVALUATION CRITERIA OF VIRTUAL CONSUMPTION

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Rafael Santos de
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Salla, Mariana Fenalti, Bertoldo, Jaqueline
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/4411
Resumo: The popularization of electronic consumption during recent years without any evolution in legislation brought about several situations in which the consumer was left unguarded. Virtual tools were constructed so that consumer may assess firms and report issues, such as the E-bit. Although a norm was published in 2013 (Decree 7962) that regulated e-commerce, it may be asked whether the sites of the best evaluated suppliers in E-Bit tools are the sites that most attend to the requirements of the norm. Current paper identifies whether the best assessed firms by consumers correspond to those that attends the terms of the law. The dialectic approach, the comparative procedure method and bibliographical and documental research techniques coupled to observation were the methods employed. The requirements that must be observed by law are not the determining factors for the characterization of the firm as excellent from the point of view of the consumer.
id UNICESU-0_0a477e7c947d9091ca009fff64ff33b8
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4411
network_acronym_str UNICESU-0
network_name_str Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling ACTIVIST CYBERCONSUMER AND DECREE 7.962/2013: PROS AND CONTRAS OF THE EVALUATION CRITERIA OF VIRTUAL CONSUMPTIONCIBERCONSUMIDOR ATIVISTA Y EL DECRETO 7.962/13: ENCUENTROS Y DESENCUENTROS EN LOS CRITERIOS DE EVALUACIÓN DEL CONSUMO VIRTUALCiberconsumidor Ativista e o Decreto 7.962/13: Encontros e Desencontros nos Critérios de Avaliação do Consumo VirtualCyberconsumptionEletronic contactConsumer 2.0E-bitCiberconsumoConsumo 2.0Contrato ElectrónicoE-bit.CiberconsumoConsumidor 2.0Contrato EletrônicoE-bit.The popularization of electronic consumption during recent years without any evolution in legislation brought about several situations in which the consumer was left unguarded. Virtual tools were constructed so that consumer may assess firms and report issues, such as the E-bit. Although a norm was published in 2013 (Decree 7962) that regulated e-commerce, it may be asked whether the sites of the best evaluated suppliers in E-Bit tools are the sites that most attend to the requirements of the norm. Current paper identifies whether the best assessed firms by consumers correspond to those that attends the terms of the law. The dialectic approach, the comparative procedure method and bibliographical and documental research techniques coupled to observation were the methods employed. The requirements that must be observed by law are not the determining factors for the characterization of the firm as excellent from the point of view of the consumer.La popularización del comercio electrónico en los últimos años, desacompañada de una evolución legislativa, ocasionó muchas situaciones de desprotección del consumidor. En ese contexto, fueron creadas herramientas virtuales que permitían a los consumidores evaluar las empresas y relatar problemas, como E-bit. Solo en 2013, fue editada una norma (Decreto 7.962) que reglamentó el comercio electrónico. Aún, se cuestiona si los sitios de los proveedores mejor evaluados por los consumidores en la herramienta E-bit corresponden a los sitios que mejor atienden a las exigencias de la legislación. Así, el presente trabajo objetiva identificar si las empresas mejor evaluadas por los consumidores en la herramienta virtual corresponden a aquellas que mejor cumplen las obligaciones impuestas por la legislación. El método de abordaje utilizado fue el dialéctico, método de procedimiento comparativo y técnicas de pesquisa bibliográfica, documental y observatorio participante. Se concluye, al final del análisis, que los requisitos a ser cumplidos por la legislación no son los factores determinantes para caracterización de una empresa como buena por el consumidor activista.A popularização do comércio eletrônico nos últimos anos, desacompanhada de uma evolução legislativa, acarretou muitas situações de desproteção do consumidor. Nesse contexto, foram criadas ferramentas virtuais que permitiam aos consumidores avaliarem as empresas e relatarem problemas, como E-bit. Somente no ano de 2013, foi editada uma norma (Decreto 7.962) que regulamentasse o comércio eletrônico. Todavia, questiona-se se os sites dos fornecedores melhor avaliados pelos consumidores na ferramenta E-bit correspondem aos sites que mais atendem às exigências da legislação. Assim, o presente trabalho objetiva identificar se as empresas mais bem avaliadas pelos consumidores na ferramenta de avaliação virtual correspondem àquelas que mais atentam às obrigações impostas pela legislação. O método de abordagem utilizado foi o dialético, método de procedimento comparativo e técnicas de pesquisa bibliográfica, documental e observatória participante. Conclui-se, ao final da análise, que os requisitos a serem cumpridos pela legislação não são os fatores determinantes para caracterização de uma empresa como boa pelo consumidor ativista.Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar2016-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/441110.17765/2176-9184.2016v16n2p455-485Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 16 n. 2 (2016): maio/ago.; 455-4852176-91841677-6402reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)instacron:UNICESUporhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/4411/2805Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestradoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Rafael Santos deSalla, Mariana FenaltiBertoldo, Jaqueline2020-10-20T17:46:34Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/4411Revistahttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridicaPRIhttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/oai||naep@unicesumar.edu.br2176-91841677-6402opendoar:2020-10-20T17:46:34Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv ACTIVIST CYBERCONSUMER AND DECREE 7.962/2013: PROS AND CONTRAS OF THE EVALUATION CRITERIA OF VIRTUAL CONSUMPTION
CIBERCONSUMIDOR ATIVISTA Y EL DECRETO 7.962/13: ENCUENTROS Y DESENCUENTROS EN LOS CRITERIOS DE EVALUACIÓN DEL CONSUMO VIRTUAL
Ciberconsumidor Ativista e o Decreto 7.962/13: Encontros e Desencontros nos Critérios de Avaliação do Consumo Virtual
title ACTIVIST CYBERCONSUMER AND DECREE 7.962/2013: PROS AND CONTRAS OF THE EVALUATION CRITERIA OF VIRTUAL CONSUMPTION
spellingShingle ACTIVIST CYBERCONSUMER AND DECREE 7.962/2013: PROS AND CONTRAS OF THE EVALUATION CRITERIA OF VIRTUAL CONSUMPTION
Oliveira, Rafael Santos de
Cyberconsumption
Eletronic contact
Consumer 2.0
E-bit
Ciberconsumo
Consumo 2.0
Contrato Electrónico
E-bit.
Ciberconsumo
Consumidor 2.0
Contrato Eletrônico
E-bit.
title_short ACTIVIST CYBERCONSUMER AND DECREE 7.962/2013: PROS AND CONTRAS OF THE EVALUATION CRITERIA OF VIRTUAL CONSUMPTION
title_full ACTIVIST CYBERCONSUMER AND DECREE 7.962/2013: PROS AND CONTRAS OF THE EVALUATION CRITERIA OF VIRTUAL CONSUMPTION
title_fullStr ACTIVIST CYBERCONSUMER AND DECREE 7.962/2013: PROS AND CONTRAS OF THE EVALUATION CRITERIA OF VIRTUAL CONSUMPTION
title_full_unstemmed ACTIVIST CYBERCONSUMER AND DECREE 7.962/2013: PROS AND CONTRAS OF THE EVALUATION CRITERIA OF VIRTUAL CONSUMPTION
title_sort ACTIVIST CYBERCONSUMER AND DECREE 7.962/2013: PROS AND CONTRAS OF THE EVALUATION CRITERIA OF VIRTUAL CONSUMPTION
author Oliveira, Rafael Santos de
author_facet Oliveira, Rafael Santos de
Salla, Mariana Fenalti
Bertoldo, Jaqueline
author_role author
author2 Salla, Mariana Fenalti
Bertoldo, Jaqueline
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Rafael Santos de
Salla, Mariana Fenalti
Bertoldo, Jaqueline
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cyberconsumption
Eletronic contact
Consumer 2.0
E-bit
Ciberconsumo
Consumo 2.0
Contrato Electrónico
E-bit.
Ciberconsumo
Consumidor 2.0
Contrato Eletrônico
E-bit.
topic Cyberconsumption
Eletronic contact
Consumer 2.0
E-bit
Ciberconsumo
Consumo 2.0
Contrato Electrónico
E-bit.
Ciberconsumo
Consumidor 2.0
Contrato Eletrônico
E-bit.
description The popularization of electronic consumption during recent years without any evolution in legislation brought about several situations in which the consumer was left unguarded. Virtual tools were constructed so that consumer may assess firms and report issues, such as the E-bit. Although a norm was published in 2013 (Decree 7962) that regulated e-commerce, it may be asked whether the sites of the best evaluated suppliers in E-Bit tools are the sites that most attend to the requirements of the norm. Current paper identifies whether the best assessed firms by consumers correspond to those that attends the terms of the law. The dialectic approach, the comparative procedure method and bibliographical and documental research techniques coupled to observation were the methods employed. The requirements that must be observed by law are not the determining factors for the characterization of the firm as excellent from the point of view of the consumer.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-08-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/4411
10.17765/2176-9184.2016v16n2p455-485
url https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/4411
identifier_str_mv 10.17765/2176-9184.2016v16n2p455-485
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/4411/2805
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 16 n. 2 (2016): maio/ago.; 455-485
2176-9184
1677-6402
reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
instacron:UNICESU
instname_str Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
instacron_str UNICESU
institution UNICESU
reponame_str Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
collection Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||naep@unicesumar.edu.br
_version_ 1798042387327483904