The Territorial Limitation of The Res Judicata in Collective Actions

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lazzari, Guilherme Nazareno
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Arenhart, Sérgio Cruz
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/1095
Resumo: This article's subject takes place on the collective action’s context and its development in the Brazilian law. As a matter of fact, the discussion concentration was about interests or rights which concern that the general population has provided, in the 90’s, a real legal control of public politics. Therefore, it has affected the federal government’s patrimonial interests at that time, which used the “provisory extremities” in order to restrict the effects of judge’s decisions on the collective custody conflicts. It has been modified, in this way, the composition of the article 16 of the Federal Rule 7.347/85 (Law of Public Civil Action), which produced territorial limits for judicata on legal decisions, which should be, spread without any limitations for the guardianship object. Thus, what results from that is a discussion about the legitimacy of that legal reform, regarding its constitutionality as well as the potential damages that it may cause to collective litigation. Finally, there are compared the present legal situation with the new arrangements made on the Project of Federal Rule nº 5.139/2009, which, if becomes approved by the parliament, will regulate the collective actions in Brazil.
id UNICESU-0_876285dea74f9a03db1190e4a35e689b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1095
network_acronym_str UNICESU-0
network_name_str Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The Territorial Limitation of The Res Judicata in Collective ActionsLa Limitación de Territorio de la Cosa Juzgada en Acciones ColectivasA Limitação Territorial da Coisa Julgada nas Ações ColetivasLaw of Public Civil ActionArticle 16Territorial limitationRes judicata.Ley de Acción Civil PúblicaArt. 16Limitación de territorioCosa Juzgada.Lei da Ação Civil PúblicaArt. 16Limitação territorialCoisa julgada.This article's subject takes place on the collective action’s context and its development in the Brazilian law. As a matter of fact, the discussion concentration was about interests or rights which concern that the general population has provided, in the 90’s, a real legal control of public politics. Therefore, it has affected the federal government’s patrimonial interests at that time, which used the “provisory extremities” in order to restrict the effects of judge’s decisions on the collective custody conflicts. It has been modified, in this way, the composition of the article 16 of the Federal Rule 7.347/85 (Law of Public Civil Action), which produced territorial limits for judicata on legal decisions, which should be, spread without any limitations for the guardianship object. Thus, what results from that is a discussion about the legitimacy of that legal reform, regarding its constitutionality as well as the potential damages that it may cause to collective litigation. Finally, there are compared the present legal situation with the new arrangements made on the Project of Federal Rule nº 5.139/2009, which, if becomes approved by the parliament, will regulate the collective actions in Brazil.El corpus de estudio de este trabajo se inserta en el contexto de las acciones colectivas y de su desarrollo en el derecho brasileño. Por supuesto, la concentración de discusiones acerca de los derechos de la población en general ha propiciado, en la década de 1990, un verdadero control judicial de políticas públicas. Así se ha logrado los intereses hacendados del Gobierno Ejecutivo Federal en el período, que se ha utilizado de medidas provisionales para ceñir la efectividad de la tutela jurisdiccional lograda por medio de los procesos colectivos. Se ha cambiado, de esa forma, la redacción del art. 16 de la Ley 7.347/85 (Ley de acción Civil Pública), realizándose, en términos bien sencillos, una limitación territorial de la cosa juzgada producida por las decisiones judiciales ahí proferidas, que, en tesis, deberían propagarse de forma ilimitada solamente en la medida del objeto a ser tutelado. En ese contexto, surge la discusión sobre la legitimidad de esa innovación legislativa, tanto en relación a la constitucionalidad del referido dispositivo legal como al posible retroceso que este representa en el ámbito del proceso colectivo. Al fin, se realiza un cotejo entre el actual contexto normativo y el que está previsto en el Proyecto de Ley nº 5.139/2009, que, si aprobado por el Congreso Nacional, pasará a orientar las acciones colectivas en Brasil.O objeto do presente trabalho se insere no contexto das ações coletivas e de seu desenvolvimento no direito brasileiro. Com efeito, a concentração de discussões a respeito de interesses ou direitos que concernem à população em geral propiciou, nos anos 90, um verdadeiro controle judicial de políticas públicas. Atingiram-se, desse modo, os interesses fazendários do Governo Executivo Federal na época, que usou de medidas provisórias para restringir a efetividade da tutela jurisdicional propiciada pelos processos coletivos. Foi modificada, assim, a redação do art. 16 da Lei 7.347/85 (Lei da Ação Civil Pública), operando-se, em termos bem simples, uma limitação territorial da coisa julgada produzida pelas decisões judiciais ali proferidas, que, em tese, deveriam se propagar ilimitadamente apenas na medida do objeto a ser tutelado. Nesse contexto surge a discussão sobre a legitimidade dessa inovação normativa, tanto em relação à constitucionalidade do referido dispositivo legal quanto ao possível retrocesso que este representa no âmbito do processo coletivo. Por fim, realiza-se um cotejo entre o atual contexto normativo e o que está previsto no Projeto de Lei n.° 5.139/2009, que, se aprovado pelo Congresso Nacional, passará a disciplinar as ações coletivas no Brasil.Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar2009-09-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/1095Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 9 n. 2 (2009): jul./dez.2176-91841677-6402reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)instacron:UNICESUporhttps://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/1095/813Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestradoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLazzari, Guilherme NazarenoArenhart, Sérgio Cruz2022-05-24T14:49:24Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1095Revistahttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridicaPRIhttp://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/oai||naep@unicesumar.edu.br2176-91841677-6402opendoar:2022-05-24T14:49:24Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Territorial Limitation of The Res Judicata in Collective Actions
La Limitación de Territorio de la Cosa Juzgada en Acciones Colectivas
A Limitação Territorial da Coisa Julgada nas Ações Coletivas
title The Territorial Limitation of The Res Judicata in Collective Actions
spellingShingle The Territorial Limitation of The Res Judicata in Collective Actions
Lazzari, Guilherme Nazareno
Law of Public Civil Action
Article 16
Territorial limitation
Res judicata.
Ley de Acción Civil Pública
Art. 16
Limitación de territorio
Cosa Juzgada.
Lei da Ação Civil Pública
Art. 16
Limitação territorial
Coisa julgada.
title_short The Territorial Limitation of The Res Judicata in Collective Actions
title_full The Territorial Limitation of The Res Judicata in Collective Actions
title_fullStr The Territorial Limitation of The Res Judicata in Collective Actions
title_full_unstemmed The Territorial Limitation of The Res Judicata in Collective Actions
title_sort The Territorial Limitation of The Res Judicata in Collective Actions
author Lazzari, Guilherme Nazareno
author_facet Lazzari, Guilherme Nazareno
Arenhart, Sérgio Cruz
author_role author
author2 Arenhart, Sérgio Cruz
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lazzari, Guilherme Nazareno
Arenhart, Sérgio Cruz
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Law of Public Civil Action
Article 16
Territorial limitation
Res judicata.
Ley de Acción Civil Pública
Art. 16
Limitación de territorio
Cosa Juzgada.
Lei da Ação Civil Pública
Art. 16
Limitação territorial
Coisa julgada.
topic Law of Public Civil Action
Article 16
Territorial limitation
Res judicata.
Ley de Acción Civil Pública
Art. 16
Limitación de territorio
Cosa Juzgada.
Lei da Ação Civil Pública
Art. 16
Limitação territorial
Coisa julgada.
description This article's subject takes place on the collective action’s context and its development in the Brazilian law. As a matter of fact, the discussion concentration was about interests or rights which concern that the general population has provided, in the 90’s, a real legal control of public politics. Therefore, it has affected the federal government’s patrimonial interests at that time, which used the “provisory extremities” in order to restrict the effects of judge’s decisions on the collective custody conflicts. It has been modified, in this way, the composition of the article 16 of the Federal Rule 7.347/85 (Law of Public Civil Action), which produced territorial limits for judicata on legal decisions, which should be, spread without any limitations for the guardianship object. Thus, what results from that is a discussion about the legitimacy of that legal reform, regarding its constitutionality as well as the potential damages that it may cause to collective litigation. Finally, there are compared the present legal situation with the new arrangements made on the Project of Federal Rule nº 5.139/2009, which, if becomes approved by the parliament, will regulate the collective actions in Brazil.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-09-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/1095
url https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/1095
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unicesumar.edu.br/index.php/revjuridica/article/view/1095/813
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Cesumar - UniCesumar
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado; v. 9 n. 2 (2009): jul./dez.
2176-9184
1677-6402
reponame:Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
instname:Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
instacron:UNICESU
instname_str Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
instacron_str UNICESU
institution UNICESU
reponame_str Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
collection Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Jurídica Cesumar - Mestrado (Online) - Centro Universitário de Maringá (UNICESUMAR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||naep@unicesumar.edu.br
_version_ 1798042386256887808

Registros relacionados